Prediction of Two Year Survival Following Elective Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms at A Single Centre Using A Random Forest Classification Algorithm.
Daniel C Thompson, Rhiannon Hackett, Peng F Wong, Gerard Danjoux, Reza Mofidi
{"title":"Prediction of Two Year Survival Following Elective Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms at A Single Centre Using A Random Forest Classification Algorithm.","authors":"Daniel C Thompson, Rhiannon Hackett, Peng F Wong, Gerard Danjoux, Reza Mofidi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.11.357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The decision to electively repair an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) involves balancing the risk of rupture, periprocedural mortality, and life expectancy. Random forest classifiers (RFCs) are powerful machine learning algorithms. The aim of this study was to construct and validate a random forest machine learning tool to predict two year survival following elective AAA repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent elective open or endovascular repair of AAA from 1 January 2008 to 31 March 2021 were reviewed. They were assessed using the Vascular Surgery Quality Improvement Program pathway involving cardiopulmonary exercise testing, contrast enhanced computerised tomography scan, and multidisciplinary assessment. Patients were followed up for at least two years. A RFC was developed using 70% of the dataset and validated using 30% to predict survival for at least two years following AAA repair.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 925 patients (n = 836 men; n = 89 women) underwent elective repair of AAA; 126 (13.6%) died during the first two years; 11 (1.2%) died from periprocedural mortality. Variable importance analysis suggested that anaerobic threshold, pre-operative haemoglobin, maximal O<sub>2</sub> consumption, body mass index, risk category, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second - forced vital capacity ratio were the most important contributors to the model. Sensitivity and specificity of the RFC for prediction of two year survival following surgery was 96.7% (95% CI 94.4 - 99%) and 67.1% (95% CI 61 - 72%); overall accuracy: 92.6% (95% CI 88 - 95%) (positive predictive value: 0.93, negative predictive value: 0.80); 10-fold cross validation revealed area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.88.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFCs based on readily available clinical data can successfully predict survival in the first two years following elective repair of AAA. Such information can contribute to the risk benefit assessment when deciding to electively repair AAAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.11.357","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The decision to electively repair an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) involves balancing the risk of rupture, periprocedural mortality, and life expectancy. Random forest classifiers (RFCs) are powerful machine learning algorithms. The aim of this study was to construct and validate a random forest machine learning tool to predict two year survival following elective AAA repair.
Methods: All patients who underwent elective open or endovascular repair of AAA from 1 January 2008 to 31 March 2021 were reviewed. They were assessed using the Vascular Surgery Quality Improvement Program pathway involving cardiopulmonary exercise testing, contrast enhanced computerised tomography scan, and multidisciplinary assessment. Patients were followed up for at least two years. A RFC was developed using 70% of the dataset and validated using 30% to predict survival for at least two years following AAA repair.
Results: A total of 925 patients (n = 836 men; n = 89 women) underwent elective repair of AAA; 126 (13.6%) died during the first two years; 11 (1.2%) died from periprocedural mortality. Variable importance analysis suggested that anaerobic threshold, pre-operative haemoglobin, maximal O2 consumption, body mass index, risk category, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second - forced vital capacity ratio were the most important contributors to the model. Sensitivity and specificity of the RFC for prediction of two year survival following surgery was 96.7% (95% CI 94.4 - 99%) and 67.1% (95% CI 61 - 72%); overall accuracy: 92.6% (95% CI 88 - 95%) (positive predictive value: 0.93, negative predictive value: 0.80); 10-fold cross validation revealed area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.88.
Conclusion: RFCs based on readily available clinical data can successfully predict survival in the first two years following elective repair of AAA. Such information can contribute to the risk benefit assessment when deciding to electively repair AAAs.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles.
Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.