{"title":"Guiding Drug Provocation Testing for Ibuprofen Hypersensitivity in a Pediatric Population: Development of the I3A Risk-Stratification Tool","authors":"Florian Stehlin MD , Connor Prosty MD , Angela Mulé BSc , Ibtihal Al-Otaibi MD , Luca Delli Colli MD , Judy Gaffar MD , Joshua Yu MD , Derek Lanoue MD, MEcon , Ana-Maria Copaescu MD , Moshe Ben-Shoshan MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.11.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ibuprofen is a main cause of drug hypersensitivity reactions in children. The gold standard for diagnosis is the drug provocation test (DPT).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to create a clinical risk-stratification tool to guide this high-risk procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We prospectively recruited children with suspected ibuprofen hypersensitivity between January 2017 and March 2024. Using stepwise bidirectional multivariable logistic regression, we calculated a predictive score for a positive ibuprofen DPT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty-two patients with a median age of 5.9 years (interquartile range: 3.4-11.1 years) had an ibuprofen DPT. Eighteen (22.0%) patients had a positive challenge, with an anaphylactic reaction for 11 (61.1%). The I3A score (acronym for ibuprofen, 3As: angioedema, anaphylaxis, age, cutoff of 3) encompasses the following items: angioedema (2 points), anaphylaxis (1 point), and age at reaction ≥10 years old (1 point). The area under the curve of the I3A score was 0.84, and the optimal cutoff of <3 conferred a sensitivity of 84.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.7%-100.0%) and a specificity of 83.3% (95% CI: 75.0%-92.2%). The negative predictive value was estimated at 94.7% (95% CI: 90.0%-100.0%), and the positive predictive value at 60.0% (95% CI: 46.2%-76.2%). The relative risk of reacting to a challenge in the group I3A 3-4 compared with 0-2 was 11.4 (95% CI: 3.62%-35.7%, <em>P</em> < .001). Anaphylaxis after DPT was observed in 9 of 25 (36.0% [95% CI: 16.0%-56.0%]) in the high-risk group as compared with 2 of 57 (3.5% [95% CI: 0.0%-8.8%]) in the low-risk group (relative risk 10.3 [95% CI: 2.4%-43.5%]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We generated a risk-stratification tool to identify children at low risk of reacting to ibuprofen challenges. Further validation is required in external cohorts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 583-593.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219824012388","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Ibuprofen is a main cause of drug hypersensitivity reactions in children. The gold standard for diagnosis is the drug provocation test (DPT).
Objective
We aimed to create a clinical risk-stratification tool to guide this high-risk procedure.
Methods
We prospectively recruited children with suspected ibuprofen hypersensitivity between January 2017 and March 2024. Using stepwise bidirectional multivariable logistic regression, we calculated a predictive score for a positive ibuprofen DPT.
Results
Eighty-two patients with a median age of 5.9 years (interquartile range: 3.4-11.1 years) had an ibuprofen DPT. Eighteen (22.0%) patients had a positive challenge, with an anaphylactic reaction for 11 (61.1%). The I3A score (acronym for ibuprofen, 3As: angioedema, anaphylaxis, age, cutoff of 3) encompasses the following items: angioedema (2 points), anaphylaxis (1 point), and age at reaction ≥10 years old (1 point). The area under the curve of the I3A score was 0.84, and the optimal cutoff of <3 conferred a sensitivity of 84.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.7%-100.0%) and a specificity of 83.3% (95% CI: 75.0%-92.2%). The negative predictive value was estimated at 94.7% (95% CI: 90.0%-100.0%), and the positive predictive value at 60.0% (95% CI: 46.2%-76.2%). The relative risk of reacting to a challenge in the group I3A 3-4 compared with 0-2 was 11.4 (95% CI: 3.62%-35.7%, P < .001). Anaphylaxis after DPT was observed in 9 of 25 (36.0% [95% CI: 16.0%-56.0%]) in the high-risk group as compared with 2 of 57 (3.5% [95% CI: 0.0%-8.8%]) in the low-risk group (relative risk 10.3 [95% CI: 2.4%-43.5%]).
Conclusions
We generated a risk-stratification tool to identify children at low risk of reacting to ibuprofen challenges. Further validation is required in external cohorts.
期刊介绍:
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.