Antibiotics for acute watery or persistent with or without bloody diarrhoea in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Syeda Kanza Naqvi, Mustafa Bin Ali Zubairi, Ayesha Arshad Ali, Ashraf Sharif, Rehana Abdus Salam, Zain Hasnain, Sajid Soofi, Shabina Ariff, Yasir Bin Nisar, Jai K Das
{"title":"Antibiotics for acute watery or persistent with or without bloody diarrhoea in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Syeda Kanza Naqvi, Mustafa Bin Ali Zubairi, Ayesha Arshad Ali, Ashraf Sharif, Rehana Abdus Salam, Zain Hasnain, Sajid Soofi, Shabina Ariff, Yasir Bin Nisar, Jai K Das","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.04211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of antibiotics in the treatment of acute and persistent watery diarrhoea has long been a subject of contention. While the advantages of using antimicrobials are acknowledged, concerns remain regarding potential adverse effects and antibiotic resistance. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of antibiotics compared to placebos for the treatment of diarrhoea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Scopus from inception until 20 July 2023 for studies published after the year 2000 assessing antibiotics vs placebo in acute and persistent diarrhoea and/or blood in stools in children less than 10 years of age. We conducted a meta-analysis for the included studies, assessed them using the Risk of Bias 2 tool, and evaluated their quality of evidence through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. This review was commissioned by WHO for revision of their guidelines for childhood diarrhoea management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included five randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for acute watery diarrhoea and no study for bloody diarrhoea. Our findings suggest that there is a significant increase in clinical cure (risk ratio (RR) = 2.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.52, 3.41; low certainty evidence) and parasitological cure (RR = 2.86; 95% CI = 1.72 to 4.74; low certainty evidence) among children with acute watery diarrhoea in the antibiotic group when compared to the placebo group. The duration of diarrhoea (in hours) was significantly reduced (mean difference = -24.90; 95% CI = -34.09, -15.71; low certainty evidence) in the intervention group, while the effect on all-cause mortality (RR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.40, 1.27; moderate certainty evidence) and the need for intravenous fluid infusion (RR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.05, 5.17; very low certainty evidence) were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In children under 10 years of age suffering from acute watery or persistent diarrhoea, antibiotics led to an apparent increase in cure rates. However, considering the low certainty of evidence, low number of studies with small sample sizes, and the fact that most studies were conducted in a single country, further investigation and cautious interpretation are warranted, as is a large multi-country RCT that would allow for firmer conclusions.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO: CRD42023447133.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"04211"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of antibiotics in the treatment of acute and persistent watery diarrhoea has long been a subject of contention. While the advantages of using antimicrobials are acknowledged, concerns remain regarding potential adverse effects and antibiotic resistance. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of antibiotics compared to placebos for the treatment of diarrhoea.

Methods: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Scopus from inception until 20 July 2023 for studies published after the year 2000 assessing antibiotics vs placebo in acute and persistent diarrhoea and/or blood in stools in children less than 10 years of age. We conducted a meta-analysis for the included studies, assessed them using the Risk of Bias 2 tool, and evaluated their quality of evidence through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. This review was commissioned by WHO for revision of their guidelines for childhood diarrhoea management.

Results: We included five randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for acute watery diarrhoea and no study for bloody diarrhoea. Our findings suggest that there is a significant increase in clinical cure (risk ratio (RR) = 2.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.52, 3.41; low certainty evidence) and parasitological cure (RR = 2.86; 95% CI = 1.72 to 4.74; low certainty evidence) among children with acute watery diarrhoea in the antibiotic group when compared to the placebo group. The duration of diarrhoea (in hours) was significantly reduced (mean difference = -24.90; 95% CI = -34.09, -15.71; low certainty evidence) in the intervention group, while the effect on all-cause mortality (RR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.40, 1.27; moderate certainty evidence) and the need for intravenous fluid infusion (RR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.05, 5.17; very low certainty evidence) were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions: In children under 10 years of age suffering from acute watery or persistent diarrhoea, antibiotics led to an apparent increase in cure rates. However, considering the low certainty of evidence, low number of studies with small sample sizes, and the fact that most studies were conducted in a single country, further investigation and cautious interpretation are warranted, as is a large multi-country RCT that would allow for firmer conclusions.

Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42023447133.

儿童急性水样腹泻或持续性伴或不伴血性腹泻的抗生素:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:长期以来,抗生素在治疗急性持续性水样腹泻中的应用一直是一个有争议的问题。虽然使用抗菌素的优点得到承认,但对潜在的不良反应和抗生素耐药性的担忧仍然存在。因此,我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估抗生素与安慰剂治疗腹泻的疗效。方法:我们检索PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov、世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台和Scopus,检索2000年以后发表的评估抗生素与安慰剂在10岁以下儿童急性和持续性腹泻和/或便血中的疗效的研究。我们对纳入的研究进行了荟萃分析,使用偏倚风险2 (Risk of Bias 2)工具进行评估,并通过推荐、评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)框架评估其证据质量。这项审查是世卫组织为修订其儿童腹泻管理指南而委托进行的。结果:我们纳入了5项针对急性水样腹泻的随机对照试验(rct),没有针对血性腹泻的研究。我们的研究结果表明,临床治愈率显著增加(风险比(RR) = 2.28;95%置信区间(CI) = 1.52, 3.41;低确定性证据)和寄生虫治疗(RR = 2.86;95% CI = 1.72 ~ 4.74;低确定性证据)在急性水样腹泻的儿童中,抗生素组与安慰剂组相比。腹泻持续时间(小时)显著缩短(平均差值= -24.90;95% ci = -34.09, -15.71;低确定性证据),而对全因死亡率的影响(RR = 0.71;95% ci = 0.40, 1.27;中等确定性证据)和静脉输液的必要性(RR = 0.50;95% ci = 0.05, 5.17;非常低确定性证据)在两组之间具有可比性。结论:在10岁以下患有急性水样腹泻或持续性腹泻的儿童中,抗生素导致治愈率明显提高。然而,考虑到证据的低确定性,研究数量少,样本量小,而且大多数研究都是在一个国家进行的,进一步的调查和谨慎的解释是有必要的,一个大型的多国随机对照试验也可以得到更确切的结论。报名:普洛斯彼罗:CRD42023447133。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信