Diaphragm pacing compared with mechanical ventilation in patients with chronic respiratory failure caused by diaphragmatic dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of diaphragmatic electrical stimulation (DES) compared to mechanical ventilation (MV) in improving clinical outcomes such as quality-of-life (QOL) and hospital stay remains inconsistent.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, LILACS, and IEEE Xplore. We included comparative studies (randomized controlled trials and observational studies) of DES administered via the phrenic nerve or intramuscular electrodes, compared with MV in adults with diaphragmatic paralysis or paresis. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed bias, with discrepancies resolved by a senior author. Results were pooled using the inverse variance method.

Results: Out of 1,290 articles, nine were included in the systematic review, totaling 852 subjects. In spinal cord injury (SCI), one study reported lower mortality with DES, while three found no difference compared to MV. In these patients, DES was associated with shorter hospital stay, similar QOL, and heterogeneous results on respiratory infections. In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), DES was associated with higher mortality and similar QOL compared to MV. Most SCI studies had a serious risk of bias.

Conclusion: DES shows potential in reducing hospital stay and respiratory infections in SCI but is associated with higher mortality in ALS.