Unpicking Causal Relationships Between Grip Strength and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Tom Norris, Rachel Cooper, Victoria Garfield, Mark Hamer, Snehal M Pinto Pereira
{"title":"Unpicking Causal Relationships Between Grip Strength and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.","authors":"Tom Norris, Rachel Cooper, Victoria Garfield, Mark Hamer, Snehal M Pinto Pereira","doi":"10.1111/sms.14775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the dominant direction of association between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and grip strength could help refine physical activity recommendations. We performed a Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis to elucidate the bidirectional relationship between CRF and grip strength (GS). Using an inverse-variance weighted (IVW) MR framework, we estimated the strength of the GS (exposure)-CRF (outcome) association using genome-wide association summary data. When examining the CRF (exposure)-GS (outcome) association, the CRF genetic instrument was related to individual-level GS phenotypic data in 367 693 UK Biobank participants. Several sensitivity analyses were performed (e.g., MR-Egger, MR-weighted median estimator and MR-PRESSO) and both measures were scaled by body weight (w). In the direction GS-to-CRF, a 1-unit increase in GSw (i.e., GS/weight) was associated with 1.70 mL/kg/min (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14,2.27) higher CRFw (IVW model). This finding persisted across most sensitivity analyses. In the reverse direction, there was no evidence supporting an effect of CRFw on GSw, e.g., a 1-unit increase in CRFw led to a 0.00 kg/kg (95% CI: -0.01,0.02) higher GSw (IVW model). Our finding of a dominant direction of association from greater GS to higher CRF is relevant when considering how to promote physical activity guidelines. For example, placing too much emphasis on improving/maintaining CRF is unlikely to result in maximum benefits for other fundamental components of physical fitness, particularly muscle strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":21466,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","volume":"34 12","pages":"e14775"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14775","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the dominant direction of association between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and grip strength could help refine physical activity recommendations. We performed a Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis to elucidate the bidirectional relationship between CRF and grip strength (GS). Using an inverse-variance weighted (IVW) MR framework, we estimated the strength of the GS (exposure)-CRF (outcome) association using genome-wide association summary data. When examining the CRF (exposure)-GS (outcome) association, the CRF genetic instrument was related to individual-level GS phenotypic data in 367 693 UK Biobank participants. Several sensitivity analyses were performed (e.g., MR-Egger, MR-weighted median estimator and MR-PRESSO) and both measures were scaled by body weight (w). In the direction GS-to-CRF, a 1-unit increase in GSw (i.e., GS/weight) was associated with 1.70 mL/kg/min (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14,2.27) higher CRFw (IVW model). This finding persisted across most sensitivity analyses. In the reverse direction, there was no evidence supporting an effect of CRFw on GSw, e.g., a 1-unit increase in CRFw led to a 0.00 kg/kg (95% CI: -0.01,0.02) higher GSw (IVW model). Our finding of a dominant direction of association from greater GS to higher CRF is relevant when considering how to promote physical activity guidelines. For example, placing too much emphasis on improving/maintaining CRF is unlikely to result in maximum benefits for other fundamental components of physical fitness, particularly muscle strength.

揭示握力和心肺健康之间的因果关系:一项双向孟德尔随机研究。
了解心肺健康(CRF)和握力之间的主要联系方向可以帮助完善体力活动建议。我们进行了孟德尔随机化(MR)分析来阐明CRF和握力(GS)之间的双向关系。使用逆方差加权(IVW) MR框架,我们使用全基因组关联汇总数据估计了GS(暴露)-CRF(结果)关联的强度。在检查CRF(暴露)-GS(结果)关联时,在367 693名英国生物银行参与者中,CRF遗传仪器与个人水平的GS表型数据相关。进行了一些敏感性分析(例如,MR-Egger, mr加权中位数估计值和MR-PRESSO),并按体重(w)进行了测量。在GS- crf方向,GSw(即GS/体重)每增加1个单位,CRFw (IVW模型)就会增加1.70 mL/kg/min(95%置信区间(CI): 1.14,2.27)。这一发现在大多数敏感性分析中都存在。相反,没有证据支持CRFw对GSw的影响,例如,CRFw增加1个单位导致GSw增加0.00 kg/kg (95% CI: -0.01,0.02) (IVW模型)。当考虑如何促进体育活动指南时,我们发现从更大的GS到更高的CRF的主要关联方向是相关的。例如,过分强调提高/维持CRF不太可能给身体健康的其他基本组成部分带来最大的好处,尤其是肌肉力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.90%
发文量
162
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports is a multidisciplinary journal published 12 times per year under the auspices of the Scandinavian Foundation of Medicine and Science in Sports. It aims to publish high quality and impactful articles in the fields of orthopaedics, rehabilitation and sports medicine, exercise physiology and biochemistry, biomechanics and motor control, health and disease relating to sport, exercise and physical activity, as well as on the social and behavioural aspects of sport and exercise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信