Kai En Chan, Beth Shin Rei Lau, Blanche Xiao Hong Lim, Ruochen Du, Giuseppe Giannaccare, Louis Tong, Fiona Stapleton, Chris Hong Long Lim
{"title":"Low-level light therapy and intense pulse light therapy in meibomian gland dysfunction. A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kai En Chan, Beth Shin Rei Lau, Blanche Xiao Hong Lim, Ruochen Du, Giuseppe Giannaccare, Louis Tong, Fiona Stapleton, Chris Hong Long Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2024.102344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a leading cause of dry eye disease, affecting over a third of the global population. This disease is associated with ocular discomfort, reduced visual quality, and quality of life. Novel treatments like Intense Pulse Light (IPL) therapy and Low-Level Light Therapy (LLLT) have been reported to be useful in refractory MGD treatment. However, no systematic review has explored the utility of combining these two therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for articles on LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD. A meta-analysis of single means was conducted to assess clinical endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 12 studies showed that LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD patients led to a significant decrease in Ocular Surface Disease Index score (MD: -22.8, 95 %CI: -29.1 to -16.5, I<sup>2</sup> = 97.5 %, p < 0.001), and a significant increase in both Tear Break-up Time (MD: 2.2 s, 95 %CI: 0.9 s to 3.4 s, I<sup>2</sup> = 98.6 %, p < 0.001) and Schirmer test (MD: 1.5 mm, 95 %CI: 0.6 mm to 2.5 mm, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0 %, p = 0.001) at ≤ 3 months post treatment. These improvements were sustained in a sensitivity analysis at endpoints ≥ 6 months post treatment. While the percentage of loss of meibomian gland area (n = 4, MD: -3.8 %, 95 %CI: -7.2 % to -0.4 %, I<sup>2</sup> = 40.0 %, p = 0.031) was reported to be significantly reduced, this was not found to be sustained at endpoints ≥ 6 months post treatment (n = 2, MD: 5.9 %, 95 %CI: 1.8 % to 10.0 %, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0 %, p = 0.005) in two studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence supporting the clinical efficacy of LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD. Future research should evaluate its long-term safety and efficacy and compare it with alternative treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":" ","pages":"102344"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a leading cause of dry eye disease, affecting over a third of the global population. This disease is associated with ocular discomfort, reduced visual quality, and quality of life. Novel treatments like Intense Pulse Light (IPL) therapy and Low-Level Light Therapy (LLLT) have been reported to be useful in refractory MGD treatment. However, no systematic review has explored the utility of combining these two therapies.
Methods: Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for articles on LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD. A meta-analysis of single means was conducted to assess clinical endpoints.
Results: Analysis of 12 studies showed that LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD patients led to a significant decrease in Ocular Surface Disease Index score (MD: -22.8, 95 %CI: -29.1 to -16.5, I2 = 97.5 %, p < 0.001), and a significant increase in both Tear Break-up Time (MD: 2.2 s, 95 %CI: 0.9 s to 3.4 s, I2 = 98.6 %, p < 0.001) and Schirmer test (MD: 1.5 mm, 95 %CI: 0.6 mm to 2.5 mm, I2 = 0.0 %, p = 0.001) at ≤ 3 months post treatment. These improvements were sustained in a sensitivity analysis at endpoints ≥ 6 months post treatment. While the percentage of loss of meibomian gland area (n = 4, MD: -3.8 %, 95 %CI: -7.2 % to -0.4 %, I2 = 40.0 %, p = 0.031) was reported to be significantly reduced, this was not found to be sustained at endpoints ≥ 6 months post treatment (n = 2, MD: 5.9 %, 95 %CI: 1.8 % to 10.0 %, I2 = 0.0 %, p = 0.005) in two studies.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence supporting the clinical efficacy of LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD. Future research should evaluate its long-term safety and efficacy and compare it with alternative treatments.
期刊介绍:
Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.