Lesion filling index predicts brain arteriovenous malformation obliteration after Gamma knife radiosurgery: a hemodynamic analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ruinan Li, Yu Chen, Pingting Chen, Li Ma, Heze Han, Zhipeng Li, Wanting Zhou, Yu Zhou, Minhan Wang, Shibin Sun, Yuanli Zhao, Xiaolin Chen
{"title":"Lesion filling index predicts brain arteriovenous malformation obliteration after Gamma knife radiosurgery: a hemodynamic analysis.","authors":"Ruinan Li, Yu Chen, Pingting Chen, Li Ma, Heze Han, Zhipeng Li, Wanting Zhou, Yu Zhou, Minhan Wang, Shibin Sun, Yuanli Zhao, Xiaolin Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03135-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hemodynamics significantly influences the clinical outcomes of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM). This study aimed to determine if the lesion filling index (LFI), obtained via quantitative digital subtraction angiography (QDSA), can predict complete complete obliteration after Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). We retrospectively reviewed AVM patients who underwent GKRS and DSA exams from 2011 to 2021. Clinical, angioarchitectural, and QDSA hemodynamic features were analyzed. The LFI, derived from QDSA, was evaluated as a predictor of complete complete obliteration post-SRS using Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Among 118 AVMs with a mean follow-up of 5.76 ± 2.76 years, post-SRS complete obliteration was linked to reduced nidus volume (7.27 ± 12.3 vs. 19.2 ± 35.7 mm³, p = 0.049), smaller nidus diameter (26.0 ± 14.9 vs. 34.1 ± 19.8 mm, p = 0.015), and absence of feeding artery dilation (21.1% vs. 46.3%, p = 0.008). Higher Arterial Diagnostic Window (ADW) (972.27 ± 1615.53 vs. 515.29 ± 730.26, p = 0.036), higher LFI (905.31 ± 2288.37 vs. 249.65 ± 1092.46, p = 0.037), and lower Transnidal Relative Velocity (TRV), a parameter defined as the maximum diameter of AVM divided by the full width at half maximum (74.31 ± 95.67 vs. 137.80 ± 152.01, p = 0.021), were also associated with complete obliteration. After adjusting for confounders, only two variables-absence of feeding artery dilation (HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.16-0.78, p = 0.010) and higher LFI (HR 1.00, 95%CI 1.00-1.00, p = 0.006) remained significant predictors. The ROC curve identified 188.4 as the LFI cutoff, and Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed LFI's predictive value (log-rank test, χ² = 12.776, p < 0.001). Elevated LFI and absence of feeding artery dilation predict AVM complete obliteration after GKRS, indicating that overfilling and low blood flow in the nidus may promote complete obliteration.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"889"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03135-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemodynamics significantly influences the clinical outcomes of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM). This study aimed to determine if the lesion filling index (LFI), obtained via quantitative digital subtraction angiography (QDSA), can predict complete complete obliteration after Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). We retrospectively reviewed AVM patients who underwent GKRS and DSA exams from 2011 to 2021. Clinical, angioarchitectural, and QDSA hemodynamic features were analyzed. The LFI, derived from QDSA, was evaluated as a predictor of complete complete obliteration post-SRS using Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Among 118 AVMs with a mean follow-up of 5.76 ± 2.76 years, post-SRS complete obliteration was linked to reduced nidus volume (7.27 ± 12.3 vs. 19.2 ± 35.7 mm³, p = 0.049), smaller nidus diameter (26.0 ± 14.9 vs. 34.1 ± 19.8 mm, p = 0.015), and absence of feeding artery dilation (21.1% vs. 46.3%, p = 0.008). Higher Arterial Diagnostic Window (ADW) (972.27 ± 1615.53 vs. 515.29 ± 730.26, p = 0.036), higher LFI (905.31 ± 2288.37 vs. 249.65 ± 1092.46, p = 0.037), and lower Transnidal Relative Velocity (TRV), a parameter defined as the maximum diameter of AVM divided by the full width at half maximum (74.31 ± 95.67 vs. 137.80 ± 152.01, p = 0.021), were also associated with complete obliteration. After adjusting for confounders, only two variables-absence of feeding artery dilation (HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.16-0.78, p = 0.010) and higher LFI (HR 1.00, 95%CI 1.00-1.00, p = 0.006) remained significant predictors. The ROC curve identified 188.4 as the LFI cutoff, and Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed LFI's predictive value (log-rank test, χ² = 12.776, p < 0.001). Elevated LFI and absence of feeding artery dilation predict AVM complete obliteration after GKRS, indicating that overfilling and low blood flow in the nidus may promote complete obliteration.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信