The importance of the cerebro-placental ratio at term for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in appropriate for gestational age fetuses.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Perinatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-09 Print Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1515/jpm-2024-0427
Hannah Josten, Yvonne Heimann, Thomas Lehmann, Ekkehard Schleußner, Tanja Groten, Friederike Weschenfelder
{"title":"The importance of the cerebro-placental ratio at term for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in appropriate for gestational age fetuses.","authors":"Hannah Josten, Yvonne Heimann, Thomas Lehmann, Ekkehard Schleußner, Tanja Groten, Friederike Weschenfelder","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the relationship between the cerebro-placental ratio (CPR) measured at 40+0 weeks' gestation and perinatal outcomes to determine a CPR cut-off that may justify induction of labor at term in appropriately grown fetuses (AGA). Although CPR is used for monitoring growth-restricted fetuses, its role in guiding labor induction decisions for AGA pregnancies at term remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 491 singleton pregnancies with intended vaginal deliveries between 2015 and 2021. CPR was assessed at the actual estimated date of delivery (40+0 weeks' gestation). Adverse pregnancy outcome (APO) as the primary endpoint was defined by admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), umbilical cord blood pH<7.1, 5-min APGAR<7 or interventions-due-to-fetal-distress during labor (IDFD=vaginal-operative delivery or emergency caesarean section).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>APO nearly doubled (adjOR 1.7; CI 1.007-2.905) when CPR was below our calculated cut-off of 1.269 (18.4 vs. 32.3 %, p=0.002) and NICU admissions (4.8 vs. 11.1 %, p=0.020) and IDFD (12.5 vs. 21.2 %, p=0.027) significantly increased. The positive predictive value for the presence of APO using our cut-off was 32.4 %, and the negative predictive value 81.6 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data confirm a predictive value of a reduced CPR at term with impaired perinatal outcome. The cut-off of CPR<1.269 may guide decision-making regarding induction of labor. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"188-195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigates the relationship between the cerebro-placental ratio (CPR) measured at 40+0 weeks' gestation and perinatal outcomes to determine a CPR cut-off that may justify induction of labor at term in appropriately grown fetuses (AGA). Although CPR is used for monitoring growth-restricted fetuses, its role in guiding labor induction decisions for AGA pregnancies at term remains unclear.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 491 singleton pregnancies with intended vaginal deliveries between 2015 and 2021. CPR was assessed at the actual estimated date of delivery (40+0 weeks' gestation). Adverse pregnancy outcome (APO) as the primary endpoint was defined by admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), umbilical cord blood pH<7.1, 5-min APGAR<7 or interventions-due-to-fetal-distress during labor (IDFD=vaginal-operative delivery or emergency caesarean section).

Results: APO nearly doubled (adjOR 1.7; CI 1.007-2.905) when CPR was below our calculated cut-off of 1.269 (18.4 vs. 32.3 %, p=0.002) and NICU admissions (4.8 vs. 11.1 %, p=0.020) and IDFD (12.5 vs. 21.2 %, p=0.027) significantly increased. The positive predictive value for the presence of APO using our cut-off was 32.4 %, and the negative predictive value 81.6 %.

Conclusions: Our data confirm a predictive value of a reduced CPR at term with impaired perinatal outcome. The cut-off of CPR<1.269 may guide decision-making regarding induction of labor. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

足月脑胎盘比对预测适当胎龄胎儿不良围产期结局的重要性。
目的:本研究探讨妊娠40+0周时测量的脑胎盘比(CPR)与围产期结局之间的关系,以确定适当生长胎儿(AGA)足月引产的CPR截止值。尽管心肺复苏术用于监测生长受限的胎儿,但其在指导足月AGA妊娠引产决策中的作用尚不清楚。方法:一项回顾性队列研究使用了2015年至2021年期间491例单胎妊娠阴道分娩的数据。在实际估计分娩日期(妊娠40+0周)评估CPR。不良妊娠结局(APO)作为主要终点的定义是入院新生儿重症监护病房(NICU),脐带血ph。结果:APO几乎翻了一番(adjOR 1.7;CI 1.007-2.905),当CPR低于我们计算的临界值1.269 (18.4 vs. 32.3 %,p=0.002)时,NICU入院率(4.8 vs. 11.1 %,p=0.020)和IDFD (12.5 vs. 21.2 %,p=0.027)显著增加。使用我们的截止值,APO存在的阳性预测值为32.4% %,阴性预测值为81.6 %。结论:我们的数据证实了足月CPR减少与围产儿预后受损的预测价值。心肺复苏的截止时间
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信