Emotional regulation as a mediating variable between risk of psychosis and common mental health problems in adolescents.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Inma Fernández, Óscar Vallina-Fernández, Sandra Alonso-Bada, Mar Rus-Calafell, Mercedes Paino
{"title":"Emotional regulation as a mediating variable between risk of psychosis and common mental health problems in adolescents.","authors":"Inma Fernández, Óscar Vallina-Fernández, Sandra Alonso-Bada, Mar Rus-Calafell, Mercedes Paino","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The main clinical high-risk of psychosis (CHRp) approaches are focused on core features of schizophrenia that might surface in the prodromal phases, mainly psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) (e.g., prodromal or schizotypal symptoms) or associated phenomena like basic symptoms or anomalous experiences of the self. Given that PLEs vary depending on distress levels, related common mental health problems, emotional regulation (ER) strategies and eventual clinical outcomes, exploring the heterogeneous nature of these PLEs and their psychological correlates could aid in distinguishing between subclinical and clinical psychotic experiences. The present study aims firstly to generate new evidence on the understanding of clinical relevance of PLEs and associated phenomena in a non-clinical representative sample of 1824 Spanish adolescents, according to their CHRp level (high/moderate/low). Secondly, we analyzed the possible mediating effect of three different emotional regulation strategies ((experiential avoidance (EA), cognitive reappraisal (CR) and emotional suppression (ES)) between PLEs and non-specific symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, trauma related distress and substance use. Results showed that a more frequent use of EA and ES resulted in a higher CHRp, with no differences in the use of CR. In addition, EA emerged as a significant mediating factor between CHRp and the development of emotional symptoms and substance use. Emotion regulation strategy may account for heterogeneity in PLE outcomes. The use of EA as a coping strategy for their PLEs in adolescents with CHRp may facilitate the development of common mental health problems such as anxiety, depression or cannabis use pathologies. Helping adolescents at CHRp to use non-avoidant coping strategies may be indicated if their preventive effects are demonstrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"181 ","pages":"273-281"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The main clinical high-risk of psychosis (CHRp) approaches are focused on core features of schizophrenia that might surface in the prodromal phases, mainly psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) (e.g., prodromal or schizotypal symptoms) or associated phenomena like basic symptoms or anomalous experiences of the self. Given that PLEs vary depending on distress levels, related common mental health problems, emotional regulation (ER) strategies and eventual clinical outcomes, exploring the heterogeneous nature of these PLEs and their psychological correlates could aid in distinguishing between subclinical and clinical psychotic experiences. The present study aims firstly to generate new evidence on the understanding of clinical relevance of PLEs and associated phenomena in a non-clinical representative sample of 1824 Spanish adolescents, according to their CHRp level (high/moderate/low). Secondly, we analyzed the possible mediating effect of three different emotional regulation strategies ((experiential avoidance (EA), cognitive reappraisal (CR) and emotional suppression (ES)) between PLEs and non-specific symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, trauma related distress and substance use. Results showed that a more frequent use of EA and ES resulted in a higher CHRp, with no differences in the use of CR. In addition, EA emerged as a significant mediating factor between CHRp and the development of emotional symptoms and substance use. Emotion regulation strategy may account for heterogeneity in PLE outcomes. The use of EA as a coping strategy for their PLEs in adolescents with CHRp may facilitate the development of common mental health problems such as anxiety, depression or cannabis use pathologies. Helping adolescents at CHRp to use non-avoidant coping strategies may be indicated if their preventive effects are demonstrated.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信