Unveiling the Elevated Risk of Osteoporosis and Fractures in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: Emphasizing Awareness of Modifiable Risk Factors

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Ilke Coskun Benlidayi, Helene Alexanderson, Latika Gupta
{"title":"Unveiling the Elevated Risk of Osteoporosis and Fractures in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: Emphasizing Awareness of Modifiable Risk Factors","authors":"Ilke Coskun Benlidayi,&nbsp;Helene Alexanderson,&nbsp;Latika Gupta","doi":"10.1111/1756-185X.15451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Comorbid conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, mood disorders, and renal impairment can be observed in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. One of the most important comorbidities relates to bone health [<span>1</span>]. Osteoporosis and fragility fractures are more common in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) compared to healthy population [<span>2, 3</span>]. Lee et al. reported increased osteoporosis risk in dermatomyositis or polymyositis independent of the treatments [<span>4</span>]. The current article aimed to (i) review the literature on bone health in IIMs and (ii) discuss the predictors of impaired bone health emphasizing awareness of modifiable risk factors.</p><p>The results of the previous studies revealed that 13%–32.7% of myositis population had osteoporosis [<span>5-9</span>] (Table 1). Fracture rate is also more common in patients with IIMs than in healthy subjects (17.9% vs. 5.1%) [<span>3</span>]. Patients with previous vertebral fractures accrue fractures at a rate of 26.2 per 100 patient years [<span>10</span>]. Moreover, almost half of the patients with inflammatory myositis have asymptomatic vertebral fractures [<span>8</span>]. The diversity in osteoporosis frequency may partly be related to the interpretation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) reports [<span>5-9</span>]. The Adult Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry recommends BMD testing in all adults with a disease/condition causing low bone mass/bone loss or those taking medications related to low bone mass/bone loss. Measuring BMD at both the posteanterior spine and hip is recommended. Forearm BMD should be tested if hip and/or spine cannot be measured or interpreted, or if hyperparathyroidism exists, or the patient is above DXA weight limit [<span>11</span>]. According to the Adult Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, osteoporosis may be diagnosed in postmenopausal women and men aged ≥ 50 if the <i>T</i>-score of the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck is ≤ −2.5. Other hip areas (e.g., Ward's area) should not be utilized to diagnose. In certain cases, the 33% radius may be used. On the other hand, in females prior to menopause and in males &lt; 50 years of age, <i>Z</i>-scores are preferred instead of not <i>T</i>-scores. <i>Z</i>-scores ≤ −2.0 are defined as “below the expected range for age”. The diagnosis of osteoporosis cannot be made solely based upon BMD in men &lt; 50 years of age. Women in the menopausal transition may be diagnosed using the World Health Organization criteria [<span>11</span>].</p><p>The risk factors of osteoporosis and fractures in IIMs can be categorized into three as (i) non-modifiable factors, (ii) potentially modifiable factors, and (iii) modifiable factors. Non-modifiable risk factors include advanced age [<span>2, 3, 8, 12</span>], female gender [<span>6</span>], disease duration [<span>13</span>], genetic background (race, family history), menopause [<span>3</span>], and low peak bone mass. Nevertheless, low peak bone mass may potentially be modified through appropriate education on bone health in younger ages. Although longer disease duration is a risk factor for osteoporosis in IIM patients, Gupta et al. showed that half of the fractures occurred in subjects with disease duration of less than 5 years [<span>8</span>]. While this finding might be attributed to the potential role of ongoing inflammation-that is to say disease itself-in bone impairment, current evidence in IIMs has several limitations. Only a limited number of studies considered bone mineral density testing at the early phase of IIMs. The mechanism of impaired bone health secondary to systemic inflammation in IIMs should be evaluated in studies with larger sample sizes. Moreover, the effects of glucocorticoid use should be controlled/excluded in analyses before concluding that inflammation itself is primarily responsible for the observed bone impairment in IIMs.</p><p>Disease-related variables including inflammatory status (disease activity), muscle weakness, glucocorticoid therapy, impaired balance, and frailty can be regarded as potentially modifiable risk factors. The impact of inflammation on bone health relates to the increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and IL-1; and the decrease in protective cytokines like IL-2 and IL-10. Such an imbalance induces osteoclastogenesis [<span>14</span>]. TNF-α and IL-1 can directly induce the expression of osteoclast-associated receptor, which is a costimulatory molecule in osteoclastogenesis. They can also increase the expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand [<span>1</span>]. There is limited data regarding the potential association of autoantibody profile with bone health in IIMs. Valle et al. showed that elevated rate of osteoporosis was independent of anti-Sjögren's-Syndrome-related antigen A (anti-SSa)/SSb or anti-Ro52 status [<span>5</span>]. It is possible to reduce the risk of osteoporosis/fractures through appropriate management of the disease. On the other hand, steroid therapy can lead to glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. In their study, Kalluru et al. showed that 85% of the IIMs experienced osteopenia or osteoporosis as a steroid-related complication [<span>15</span>]. This point underscores the importance of routine follow-ups in patients with IIMs, those on steroid therapy in particular.</p><p>Modifiable factors include aspects such as hypovitaminosis D, smoking and alcohol consumption, nutritional deficiencies, and a sedentary lifestyle. Being aware of the modifiable risk factors and targeting them is essential in preventing bone loss in IIMs. Such an approach can also help reduce fracture risk and fracture-related morbidities and mortality. Vincze et al. showed that the number of prevalent fractures was correlated with reduced physical function and poorer health status in patients with myositis group [<span>12</span>]. Exercise therapy can improve bone health through several mechanisms in patients with IIMs. Exercise can enhance capillary density, thereby improving microcirculation in muscles. Additionally, mitochondrial biogenesis and enzyme activity can be increased particularly by endurance exercises [<span>16, 17</span>]. Improved protein synthesis and cytoskeletal restructuring can increase muscle strength/function, which is required for proper bone health. A large cohort study revealed that patients who achieve or exceed recommendations for physical activity present with better muscle function and lower organ damage assessed by the Myositis Damage Index compared to individuals who were physically inactive [<span>18</span>]. Exercise has anti-inflammatory effects as well. Reprogramming of immune and inflammatory pathways and reduction in endoplasmic reticulum stress can decrease muscle fibrosis. This effect not only decreases inflammation-related bone loss, but also further improves muscular strength and function [<span>16</span>]. Increased muscle activity and mechanical loading can enhance osteblastogenesis. Moreover, improved muscular performance can reduce the risk of falls and fractures. Thus, contrary to the earlier belief that exercise should be avoided in IIM, it is now considered a crucial and safe non-pharmacological supportive treatment in all stages of the disease [<span>19</span>].</p><p>Patients with IIMs-particularly those on glucocorticoids-should be evaluated regularly in terms of osteoporosis risk. According to the 2022 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis, fracture risk assessment should be performed in adults starting/continuing glucocorticoids for over 3 months. Pharmacologic treatment is recommended for those at medium to very high fracture risk, with oral or intravenous bisphosphonates, denosumab, or parathyroid hormone analogs. Anabolic agents are conditionally recommended as initial therapy for high−/very high-risk cases [<span>20</span>].</p><p>When managing patients with IIMs, it is crucial to carefully consider modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis. A few practical ways to address the modifiable risk factors are proper nutrition and consumption of essential vitamins/minerals, quitting smoking, avoidance of excessive alcohol intake, management of hypovitaminosis D, and tailoring individualized exercise regimens [<span>1</span>]. Modifiable risk factors can significantly impact the patient's condition, and because they can be adjusted, they present an important opportunity for intervention.</p><p>Conception and design of study: I.C.B., H.A., L.G. Interpretation of literature data: I.C.B., H.A., L.G. Drafting the article: I.C.B. Revising the article critically for important intellectual content: I.C.B., H.A., L.G. Final approval of the version to be submitted: I.C.B., H.A., L.G. All co-authors take full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of all aspects of the research. All authors approve the submitted version of the manuscript.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":14330,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","volume":"27 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1756-185X.15451","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185X.15451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comorbid conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, mood disorders, and renal impairment can be observed in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. One of the most important comorbidities relates to bone health [1]. Osteoporosis and fragility fractures are more common in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) compared to healthy population [2, 3]. Lee et al. reported increased osteoporosis risk in dermatomyositis or polymyositis independent of the treatments [4]. The current article aimed to (i) review the literature on bone health in IIMs and (ii) discuss the predictors of impaired bone health emphasizing awareness of modifiable risk factors.

The results of the previous studies revealed that 13%–32.7% of myositis population had osteoporosis [5-9] (Table 1). Fracture rate is also more common in patients with IIMs than in healthy subjects (17.9% vs. 5.1%) [3]. Patients with previous vertebral fractures accrue fractures at a rate of 26.2 per 100 patient years [10]. Moreover, almost half of the patients with inflammatory myositis have asymptomatic vertebral fractures [8]. The diversity in osteoporosis frequency may partly be related to the interpretation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) reports [5-9]. The Adult Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry recommends BMD testing in all adults with a disease/condition causing low bone mass/bone loss or those taking medications related to low bone mass/bone loss. Measuring BMD at both the posteanterior spine and hip is recommended. Forearm BMD should be tested if hip and/or spine cannot be measured or interpreted, or if hyperparathyroidism exists, or the patient is above DXA weight limit [11]. According to the Adult Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, osteoporosis may be diagnosed in postmenopausal women and men aged ≥ 50 if the T-score of the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck is ≤ −2.5. Other hip areas (e.g., Ward's area) should not be utilized to diagnose. In certain cases, the 33% radius may be used. On the other hand, in females prior to menopause and in males < 50 years of age, Z-scores are preferred instead of not T-scores. Z-scores ≤ −2.0 are defined as “below the expected range for age”. The diagnosis of osteoporosis cannot be made solely based upon BMD in men < 50 years of age. Women in the menopausal transition may be diagnosed using the World Health Organization criteria [11].

The risk factors of osteoporosis and fractures in IIMs can be categorized into three as (i) non-modifiable factors, (ii) potentially modifiable factors, and (iii) modifiable factors. Non-modifiable risk factors include advanced age [2, 3, 8, 12], female gender [6], disease duration [13], genetic background (race, family history), menopause [3], and low peak bone mass. Nevertheless, low peak bone mass may potentially be modified through appropriate education on bone health in younger ages. Although longer disease duration is a risk factor for osteoporosis in IIM patients, Gupta et al. showed that half of the fractures occurred in subjects with disease duration of less than 5 years [8]. While this finding might be attributed to the potential role of ongoing inflammation-that is to say disease itself-in bone impairment, current evidence in IIMs has several limitations. Only a limited number of studies considered bone mineral density testing at the early phase of IIMs. The mechanism of impaired bone health secondary to systemic inflammation in IIMs should be evaluated in studies with larger sample sizes. Moreover, the effects of glucocorticoid use should be controlled/excluded in analyses before concluding that inflammation itself is primarily responsible for the observed bone impairment in IIMs.

Disease-related variables including inflammatory status (disease activity), muscle weakness, glucocorticoid therapy, impaired balance, and frailty can be regarded as potentially modifiable risk factors. The impact of inflammation on bone health relates to the increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and IL-1; and the decrease in protective cytokines like IL-2 and IL-10. Such an imbalance induces osteoclastogenesis [14]. TNF-α and IL-1 can directly induce the expression of osteoclast-associated receptor, which is a costimulatory molecule in osteoclastogenesis. They can also increase the expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand [1]. There is limited data regarding the potential association of autoantibody profile with bone health in IIMs. Valle et al. showed that elevated rate of osteoporosis was independent of anti-Sjögren's-Syndrome-related antigen A (anti-SSa)/SSb or anti-Ro52 status [5]. It is possible to reduce the risk of osteoporosis/fractures through appropriate management of the disease. On the other hand, steroid therapy can lead to glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. In their study, Kalluru et al. showed that 85% of the IIMs experienced osteopenia or osteoporosis as a steroid-related complication [15]. This point underscores the importance of routine follow-ups in patients with IIMs, those on steroid therapy in particular.

Modifiable factors include aspects such as hypovitaminosis D, smoking and alcohol consumption, nutritional deficiencies, and a sedentary lifestyle. Being aware of the modifiable risk factors and targeting them is essential in preventing bone loss in IIMs. Such an approach can also help reduce fracture risk and fracture-related morbidities and mortality. Vincze et al. showed that the number of prevalent fractures was correlated with reduced physical function and poorer health status in patients with myositis group [12]. Exercise therapy can improve bone health through several mechanisms in patients with IIMs. Exercise can enhance capillary density, thereby improving microcirculation in muscles. Additionally, mitochondrial biogenesis and enzyme activity can be increased particularly by endurance exercises [16, 17]. Improved protein synthesis and cytoskeletal restructuring can increase muscle strength/function, which is required for proper bone health. A large cohort study revealed that patients who achieve or exceed recommendations for physical activity present with better muscle function and lower organ damage assessed by the Myositis Damage Index compared to individuals who were physically inactive [18]. Exercise has anti-inflammatory effects as well. Reprogramming of immune and inflammatory pathways and reduction in endoplasmic reticulum stress can decrease muscle fibrosis. This effect not only decreases inflammation-related bone loss, but also further improves muscular strength and function [16]. Increased muscle activity and mechanical loading can enhance osteblastogenesis. Moreover, improved muscular performance can reduce the risk of falls and fractures. Thus, contrary to the earlier belief that exercise should be avoided in IIM, it is now considered a crucial and safe non-pharmacological supportive treatment in all stages of the disease [19].

Patients with IIMs-particularly those on glucocorticoids-should be evaluated regularly in terms of osteoporosis risk. According to the 2022 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis, fracture risk assessment should be performed in adults starting/continuing glucocorticoids for over 3 months. Pharmacologic treatment is recommended for those at medium to very high fracture risk, with oral or intravenous bisphosphonates, denosumab, or parathyroid hormone analogs. Anabolic agents are conditionally recommended as initial therapy for high−/very high-risk cases [20].

When managing patients with IIMs, it is crucial to carefully consider modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis. A few practical ways to address the modifiable risk factors are proper nutrition and consumption of essential vitamins/minerals, quitting smoking, avoidance of excessive alcohol intake, management of hypovitaminosis D, and tailoring individualized exercise regimens [1]. Modifiable risk factors can significantly impact the patient's condition, and because they can be adjusted, they present an important opportunity for intervention.

Conception and design of study: I.C.B., H.A., L.G. Interpretation of literature data: I.C.B., H.A., L.G. Drafting the article: I.C.B. Revising the article critically for important intellectual content: I.C.B., H.A., L.G. Final approval of the version to be submitted: I.C.B., H.A., L.G. All co-authors take full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of all aspects of the research. All authors approve the submitted version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

揭示特发性炎性肌病中骨质疏松和骨折的高风险:强调对可改变的危险因素的认识。
在自身免疫性炎症性风湿病患者中可观察到心血管疾病、情绪障碍和肾脏损害等合并症。最重要的合并症之一与骨骼健康有关。与健康人群相比,骨质疏松和脆性骨折在特发性炎症性肌病(IIMs)患者中更为常见[2,3]。Lee等人报道了皮肌炎或多发性肌炎的骨质疏松风险增加与治疗无关[10]。本文的目的是(i)回顾IIMs中骨骼健康的文献,(ii)讨论骨骼健康受损的预测因素,强调认识到可改变的危险因素。既往研究结果显示,13%-32.7%的肌炎人群存在骨质疏松症[5-9](表1)。iim患者的骨折率也高于健康人群(17.9%比5.1%)。既往有椎体骨折的患者发生骨折的比率为26.2 / 100患者年bbb。此外,几乎一半的炎症性肌炎患者有无症状的椎体骨折。骨质疏松症发生频率的差异可能部分与双能x线吸收仪(DXA)报告的解释有关[5-9]。国际临床密度测定学会成人官方职位建议对所有患有导致低骨量/骨质流失的疾病/病症或正在服用与低骨量/骨质流失相关药物的成年人进行骨密度测试。建议同时测量脊柱前路和髋关节的骨密度。如果不能测量或解释髋关节和/或脊柱,或存在甲状旁腺功能亢进,或患者超过DXA体重限制[11],则应检测前臂骨密度。根据国际临床密度测量学会成人官方职位,如果腰椎、全髋关节或股骨颈的t评分≤- 2.5,则绝经后女性和≥50岁的男性可诊断为骨质疏松症。其他髋关节区域(如沃德区)不应用于诊断。在某些情况下,可以使用33%的半径。另一方面,在绝经前的女性和50岁以上的男性中,更倾向于使用z分数而不是t分数。z分数≤- 2.0定义为“低于年龄预期范围”。骨质疏松症的诊断不能仅仅基于50岁男性的骨密度。处于更年期过渡期的妇女可以使用世界卫生组织的标准[11]进行诊断。iim患者骨质疏松和骨折的危险因素可分为三类,即(i)不可改变因素,(ii)潜在可改变因素和(iii)可改变因素。不可改变的危险因素包括高龄[2,3,8,12]、女性性别[6]、病程[13]、遗传背景(种族、家族史)、绝经期[3]和骨量峰值过低。然而,低峰值骨量可能会通过适当的骨骼健康教育在年轻的年龄被修改。虽然疾病持续时间较长是IIM患者骨质疏松的危险因素,但Gupta等人的研究表明,一半的骨折发生在疾病持续时间少于5年的受试者中。虽然这一发现可能归因于持续炎症(即疾病本身)在骨损伤中的潜在作用,但目前关于IIMs的证据有一些局限性。只有有限数量的研究考虑在IIMs的早期阶段进行骨矿物质密度检测。IIMs继发于全身性炎症的骨骼健康受损机制应在更大样本量的研究中进行评估。此外,在得出炎症本身是iim中观察到的骨损伤的主要原因之前,在分析中应控制/排除糖皮质激素使用的影响。疾病相关变量包括炎症状态(疾病活动性)、肌肉无力、糖皮质激素治疗、平衡受损和虚弱可被视为潜在的可改变的危险因素。炎症对骨骼健康的影响与促炎细胞因子如白细胞介素(IL)-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)和IL-1的分泌增加有关;以及IL-2和IL-10等保护性细胞因子的减少。这种不平衡诱导破骨细胞生成[14]。TNF-α和IL-1可直接诱导破骨细胞相关受体的表达,破骨细胞相关受体是破骨细胞发生过程中的共刺激分子。它们还能增加核因子- κ B配体受体激活因子[1]的表达。关于IIMs中自身抗体谱与骨骼健康的潜在关联的数据有限。Valle等研究表明,骨质疏松率升高与anti-Sjögren综合征相关抗原A (anti-SSa)/SSb或抗ro52状态[5]无关。通过适当的疾病管理可以降低骨质疏松症/骨折的风险。另一方面,类固醇治疗可导致糖皮质激素诱导的骨质疏松症。 在Kalluru等人的研究中,他们发现85%的iim患者出现骨质减少或骨质疏松症,这是一种类固醇相关并发症bbb。这一点强调了iim患者,特别是类固醇治疗患者常规随访的重要性。可改变的因素包括维生素D缺乏症、吸烟和饮酒、营养缺乏和久坐不动的生活方式。意识到可改变的危险因素并针对它们是预防iim骨质流失的必要因素。这种方法还可以帮助降低骨折风险和骨折相关的发病率和死亡率。Vincze等人的研究表明,bbb组肌炎患者普遍骨折的数量与身体功能下降和健康状况较差相关[0]。运动疗法可以通过多种机制改善IIMs患者的骨骼健康。运动可以增强毛细血管密度,从而改善肌肉的微循环。此外,线粒体生物发生和酶活性可以通过耐力运动增加[16,17]。改善蛋白质合成和细胞骨架重组可以增加肌肉力量/功能,这是骨骼健康所必需的。一项大型队列研究显示,与不运动的患者相比,达到或超过推荐运动量的患者肌肉功能更好,肌炎损伤指数(Myositis damage Index)评估的器官损伤更低。运动也有消炎的作用。免疫和炎症途径的重编程以及内质网应激的减少可以减少肌肉纤维化。这种效果不仅可以减少炎症相关的骨质流失,还可以进一步提高肌肉力量和功能。增加肌肉活动和机械负荷可以促进成骨细胞的形成。此外,改善肌肉活动可以减少跌倒和骨折的风险。因此,与早期认为IIM应避免运动的观点相反,现在认为运动在疾病的所有阶段都是至关重要和安全的非药物支持治疗。iims患者,特别是那些使用糖皮质激素的患者,应该定期评估骨质疏松的风险。根据2022年美国风湿病学会预防和治疗糖皮质激素诱导的骨质疏松症指南,成人开始或持续使用糖皮质激素超过3个月时应进行骨折风险评估。对于中等至极高骨折风险的患者,建议使用口服或静脉注射双膦酸盐、地诺单抗或甲状旁腺激素类似物进行药物治疗。有条件地推荐合成代谢药物作为高/高危病例的初始治疗。在管理iim患者时,仔细考虑骨质疏松症可改变的危险因素是至关重要的。解决可改变的风险因素的一些实际方法是适当的营养和必需维生素/矿物质的消耗,戒烟,避免过量饮酒,控制维生素D缺乏症,以及量身定制个性化的运动方案[10]。可改变的危险因素可以显著影响患者的病情,因为它们可以调整,它们提供了一个重要的干预机会。研究构思与设计:I.C.B, H.A, L.G.文献资料解读:I.C.B, H.A, L.G.撰写文章:I.C.B对文章重要知识内容进行批判性修改:I.C.B, H.A, L.G.提交版本的最终审定:I.C.B, H.A, L.G.所有共同作者对研究各方面的完整性和准确性负全部责任。所有作者都同意提交的手稿版本。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
362
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases (formerly APLAR Journal of Rheumatology) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology. The Journal accepts original articles on clinical or experimental research pertinent to the rheumatic diseases, work on connective tissue diseases and other immune and allergic disorders. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer reviewed by two anonymous reviewers and the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信