ESR Essentials: how to get to valuable radiology AI: the role of early health technology assessment-practice recommendations by the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-11188-3
Erik H M Kemper, Hendrik Erenstein, Bart-Jan Boverhof, Ken Redekop, Anna E Andreychenko, Matthias Dietzel, Kevin B W Groot Lipman, Merel Huisman, Michail E Klontzas, Frans Vos, Maarten IJzerman, Martijn P A Starmans, Jacob J Visser
{"title":"ESR Essentials: how to get to valuable radiology AI: the role of early health technology assessment-practice recommendations by the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics.","authors":"Erik H M Kemper, Hendrik Erenstein, Bart-Jan Boverhof, Ken Redekop, Anna E Andreychenko, Matthias Dietzel, Kevin B W Groot Lipman, Merel Huisman, Michail E Klontzas, Frans Vos, Maarten IJzerman, Martijn P A Starmans, Jacob J Visser","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11188-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AI tools in radiology are revolutionising the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients. However, there is a major gap between the large number of developed AI tools and those translated into daily clinical practice, which can be primarily attributed to limited usefulness and trust in current AI tools. Instead of technically driven development, little effort has been put into value-based development to ensure AI tools will have a clinically relevant impact on patient care. An iterative comprehensive value evaluation process covering the complete AI tool lifecycle should be part of radiology AI development. For value assessment of health technologies, health technology assessment (HTA) is an extensively used and comprehensive method. While most aspects of value covered by HTA apply to radiology AI, additional aspects, including transparency, explainability, and robustness, are unique to radiology AI and crucial in its value assessment. Additionally, value assessment should already be included early in the design stage to determine the potential impact and subsequent requirements of the AI tool. Such early assessment should be systematic, transparent, and practical to ensure all stakeholders and value aspects are considered. Hence, early value-based development by incorporating early HTA will lead to more valuable AI tools and thus facilitate translation to clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This paper advocates for the use of early value-based assessments. These assessments promote a comprehensive evaluation on how an AI tool in development can provide value in clinical practice and thus help improve the quality of these tools and the clinical process they support. KEY POINTS: Value in radiology AI should be perceived as a comprehensive term including health technology assessment domains and AI-specific domains. Incorporation of an early health technology assessment for radiology AI during development will lead to more valuable radiology AI tools. Comprehensive and transparent value assessment of radiology AI tools is essential for their widespread adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"3432-3441"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11188-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI tools in radiology are revolutionising the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients. However, there is a major gap between the large number of developed AI tools and those translated into daily clinical practice, which can be primarily attributed to limited usefulness and trust in current AI tools. Instead of technically driven development, little effort has been put into value-based development to ensure AI tools will have a clinically relevant impact on patient care. An iterative comprehensive value evaluation process covering the complete AI tool lifecycle should be part of radiology AI development. For value assessment of health technologies, health technology assessment (HTA) is an extensively used and comprehensive method. While most aspects of value covered by HTA apply to radiology AI, additional aspects, including transparency, explainability, and robustness, are unique to radiology AI and crucial in its value assessment. Additionally, value assessment should already be included early in the design stage to determine the potential impact and subsequent requirements of the AI tool. Such early assessment should be systematic, transparent, and practical to ensure all stakeholders and value aspects are considered. Hence, early value-based development by incorporating early HTA will lead to more valuable AI tools and thus facilitate translation to clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This paper advocates for the use of early value-based assessments. These assessments promote a comprehensive evaluation on how an AI tool in development can provide value in clinical practice and thus help improve the quality of these tools and the clinical process they support. KEY POINTS: Value in radiology AI should be perceived as a comprehensive term including health technology assessment domains and AI-specific domains. Incorporation of an early health technology assessment for radiology AI during development will lead to more valuable radiology AI tools. Comprehensive and transparent value assessment of radiology AI tools is essential for their widespread adoption.

ESR要点:如何获得有价值的放射学人工智能:欧洲医学影像信息学学会早期卫生技术评估实践建议的作用。
放射学中的人工智能工具正在彻底改变患者的诊断、评估和管理。然而,大量开发的人工智能工具与转化为日常临床实践的人工智能工具之间存在重大差距,这主要归因于当前人工智能工具的实用性和信任度有限。在以价值为基础的开发上,几乎没有投入任何努力来确保人工智能工具对患者护理产生临床相关的影响,而不是技术驱动的开发。覆盖整个人工智能工具生命周期的迭代综合价值评估过程应该是放射学人工智能开发的一部分。对于卫生技术的价值评估,卫生技术评估(HTA)是一种广泛使用的综合性方法。虽然HTA涵盖的价值的大多数方面适用于放射学人工智能,但其他方面,包括透明度、可解释性和鲁棒性,是放射学人工智能所独有的,在其价值评估中至关重要。此外,在设计阶段的早期就应该包括价值评估,以确定人工智能工具的潜在影响和后续需求。这样的早期评估应该是系统的、透明的和实用的,以确保考虑到所有利益相关者和价值方面。因此,结合早期HTA的早期基于价值的开发将带来更有价值的人工智能工具,从而促进转化为临床实践。临床相关性声明:本文提倡使用早期基于价值的评估。这些评估促进了对开发中的人工智能工具如何在临床实践中提供价值的全面评估,从而有助于提高这些工具及其所支持的临床过程的质量。重点:放射学人工智能的价值应被视为一个综合术语,包括卫生技术评估领域和人工智能特定领域。在开发过程中纳入放射学人工智能的早期卫生技术评估将产生更有价值的放射学人工智能工具。对放射学人工智能工具进行全面、透明的价值评估对于其广泛采用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信