Effectiveness of Organ Preservation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Complete Clinical Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kaibo Ouyang, Zifeng Yang, Yuesheng Yang, Zejian Lyu, Junjiang Wang, Yong Li
{"title":"Effectiveness of Organ Preservation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Complete Clinical Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.","authors":"Kaibo Ouyang, Zifeng Yang, Yuesheng Yang, Zejian Lyu, Junjiang Wang, Yong Li","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery is the common treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Presently, for patients with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, organ preservation (\"watch-and-wait\" and local excision strategies) has been increasingly favored. However, the optimal treatment for patients with complete clinical response remains still unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to use Bayesian meta-analysis to determine the best treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response among radical surgery, local excision, and watch and wait strategies.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Web Of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase(Ovid) were searched until December 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies that compared two or more treatments for patients with complete clinical response were included.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The analysis was completed via Bayesian meta-analysis using random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Surgery-related complications, local recurrence, distant metastasis, 5-year overall and disease-free survival rate.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Eleven articles met inclusion criteria. The groups of watch and wait and local excision exhibited a higher rate of tumor recurrence compared to radical surgery group (OR [95% CI]: watch and wait VS radical surgery: 9.10 [3.30, 32.3], local excision VS radical surgery: 2.93 [1.05, 9.95]). The distant metastasis, overall and disease-free survival rates of 3 treatments were not statistically different. The radical surgery group had the most number of stoma, and had the greatest risk of morbidity than the watch and wait group (OR[95%CI]: watch and wait VS radical surgery: 0.00 [0.00, 0.12]).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study included only 1 randomized controlled trial compared to 10 observational studies, which could affect overall quality. Funnel plots of disease-free survival rates and stoma suggest significant publication bias among studies which compared radical surgery with watch and wait strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The watch and wait strategy could be optimal for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery is the common treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Presently, for patients with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, organ preservation ("watch-and-wait" and local excision strategies) has been increasingly favored. However, the optimal treatment for patients with complete clinical response remains still unclear.

Objective: This study aimed to use Bayesian meta-analysis to determine the best treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response among radical surgery, local excision, and watch and wait strategies.

Data sources: PubMed, Web Of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase(Ovid) were searched until December 31, 2023.

Study selection: Studies that compared two or more treatments for patients with complete clinical response were included.

Intervention: The analysis was completed via Bayesian meta-analysis using random-effects model.

Main outcomes: Surgery-related complications, local recurrence, distant metastasis, 5-year overall and disease-free survival rate.

Result: Eleven articles met inclusion criteria. The groups of watch and wait and local excision exhibited a higher rate of tumor recurrence compared to radical surgery group (OR [95% CI]: watch and wait VS radical surgery: 9.10 [3.30, 32.3], local excision VS radical surgery: 2.93 [1.05, 9.95]). The distant metastasis, overall and disease-free survival rates of 3 treatments were not statistically different. The radical surgery group had the most number of stoma, and had the greatest risk of morbidity than the watch and wait group (OR[95%CI]: watch and wait VS radical surgery: 0.00 [0.00, 0.12]).

Limitations: The study included only 1 randomized controlled trial compared to 10 observational studies, which could affect overall quality. Funnel plots of disease-free survival rates and stoma suggest significant publication bias among studies which compared radical surgery with watch and wait strategy.

Conclusion: The watch and wait strategy could be optimal for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信