Effectiveness of Organ Preservation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Complete Clinical Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.
{"title":"Effectiveness of Organ Preservation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Complete Clinical Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.","authors":"Kaibo Ouyang, Zifeng Yang, Yuesheng Yang, Zejian Lyu, Junjiang Wang, Yong Li","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery is the common treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Presently, for patients with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, organ preservation (\"watch-and-wait\" and local excision strategies) has been increasingly favored. However, the optimal treatment for patients with complete clinical response remains still unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to use Bayesian meta-analysis to determine the best treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response among radical surgery, local excision, and watch and wait strategies.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Web Of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase(Ovid) were searched until December 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies that compared two or more treatments for patients with complete clinical response were included.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The analysis was completed via Bayesian meta-analysis using random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Surgery-related complications, local recurrence, distant metastasis, 5-year overall and disease-free survival rate.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Eleven articles met inclusion criteria. The groups of watch and wait and local excision exhibited a higher rate of tumor recurrence compared to radical surgery group (OR [95% CI]: watch and wait VS radical surgery: 9.10 [3.30, 32.3], local excision VS radical surgery: 2.93 [1.05, 9.95]). The distant metastasis, overall and disease-free survival rates of 3 treatments were not statistically different. The radical surgery group had the most number of stoma, and had the greatest risk of morbidity than the watch and wait group (OR[95%CI]: watch and wait VS radical surgery: 0.00 [0.00, 0.12]).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study included only 1 randomized controlled trial compared to 10 observational studies, which could affect overall quality. Funnel plots of disease-free survival rates and stoma suggest significant publication bias among studies which compared radical surgery with watch and wait strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The watch and wait strategy could be optimal for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery is the common treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Presently, for patients with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, organ preservation ("watch-and-wait" and local excision strategies) has been increasingly favored. However, the optimal treatment for patients with complete clinical response remains still unclear.
Objective: This study aimed to use Bayesian meta-analysis to determine the best treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response among radical surgery, local excision, and watch and wait strategies.
Data sources: PubMed, Web Of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase(Ovid) were searched until December 31, 2023.
Study selection: Studies that compared two or more treatments for patients with complete clinical response were included.
Intervention: The analysis was completed via Bayesian meta-analysis using random-effects model.
Main outcomes: Surgery-related complications, local recurrence, distant metastasis, 5-year overall and disease-free survival rate.
Result: Eleven articles met inclusion criteria. The groups of watch and wait and local excision exhibited a higher rate of tumor recurrence compared to radical surgery group (OR [95% CI]: watch and wait VS radical surgery: 9.10 [3.30, 32.3], local excision VS radical surgery: 2.93 [1.05, 9.95]). The distant metastasis, overall and disease-free survival rates of 3 treatments were not statistically different. The radical surgery group had the most number of stoma, and had the greatest risk of morbidity than the watch and wait group (OR[95%CI]: watch and wait VS radical surgery: 0.00 [0.00, 0.12]).
Limitations: The study included only 1 randomized controlled trial compared to 10 observational studies, which could affect overall quality. Funnel plots of disease-free survival rates and stoma suggest significant publication bias among studies which compared radical surgery with watch and wait strategy.
Conclusion: The watch and wait strategy could be optimal for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.