Gestational diabetes mellitus and risk of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Fang Yang, Hua Liu, Cuixia Ding
{"title":"Gestational diabetes mellitus and risk of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Fang Yang, Hua Liu, Cuixia Ding","doi":"10.1186/s13098-024-01539-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), a common pregnancy complication characterized by glucose intolerance, is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (NRDS). This study aimed to systematically review and quantify the association between GDM and NRDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science from their inception through July 30, 2024, to identify relevant studies. A total of 44 studies, including 50 datasets and over 6.2 million participants, were included in the analysis. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and assess heterogeneity among studies. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on study design, gestational age, diagnostic methods, and geographical regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant association between GDM and an increased risk of NRDS in newborns (OR 1.9; 95%CI 1.5-2.3). A sub-group analysis based on studies participants showed significant association in both GDM-based (OR, 2.0; 95%CI, 1.5-2.7) and NRSD-based studies (OR, 1.7; 95%CI, 1.3-2.3). This association was consistent across other various subgroups, including both term and preterm pregnancies and across different continents. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings, and cumulative meta-analysis showed a steady increase in the strength of the association over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight GDM as a significant risk factor for NRDS, underscoring the need for early detection and effective management of GDM to reduce adverse neonatal outcomes. However, limitations such as residual confounding, high heterogeneity among studies, and evidence of publication bias should be considered when interpreting these results. Future research should address these issues by including diverse populations and accounting for key confounders to better understand the GDM-NRDS relationship and explore targeted interventions to mitigate the risk in infants born to mothers with GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":11106,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":"16 1","pages":"294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01539-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), a common pregnancy complication characterized by glucose intolerance, is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (NRDS). This study aimed to systematically review and quantify the association between GDM and NRDS.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science from their inception through July 30, 2024, to identify relevant studies. A total of 44 studies, including 50 datasets and over 6.2 million participants, were included in the analysis. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and assess heterogeneity among studies. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on study design, gestational age, diagnostic methods, and geographical regions.

Results: Our meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant association between GDM and an increased risk of NRDS in newborns (OR 1.9; 95%CI 1.5-2.3). A sub-group analysis based on studies participants showed significant association in both GDM-based (OR, 2.0; 95%CI, 1.5-2.7) and NRSD-based studies (OR, 1.7; 95%CI, 1.3-2.3). This association was consistent across other various subgroups, including both term and preterm pregnancies and across different continents. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings, and cumulative meta-analysis showed a steady increase in the strength of the association over time.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight GDM as a significant risk factor for NRDS, underscoring the need for early detection and effective management of GDM to reduce adverse neonatal outcomes. However, limitations such as residual confounding, high heterogeneity among studies, and evidence of publication bias should be considered when interpreting these results. Future research should address these issues by including diverse populations and accounting for key confounders to better understand the GDM-NRDS relationship and explore targeted interventions to mitigate the risk in infants born to mothers with GDM.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome publishes articles on all aspects of the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. By publishing original material exploring any area of laboratory, animal or clinical research into diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the journal offers a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions into the issues of importance to the relevant community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信