Extracorporeal Photopheresis for the prevention of rejection after lung transplantation - a prospective randomized controlled trial.

IF 16.6 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Alberto Benazzo, Ara Cho, Sophia Auner, Stefan Schwarz, Zsofia Kovacs, Dariga Ramazanova, Vera Kolovratova, Manuela Branka, Gabriela Muraközy, Elisabeth Hielle-Wittmann, Clemens Aigner, Konrad Hoetzenecker, Thomas Wekerle, Nina Worel, Robert Knobler, Peter Jaksch
{"title":"Extracorporeal Photopheresis for the prevention of rejection after lung transplantation - a prospective randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Alberto Benazzo, Ara Cho, Sophia Auner, Stefan Schwarz, Zsofia Kovacs, Dariga Ramazanova, Vera Kolovratova, Manuela Branka, Gabriela Muraközy, Elisabeth Hielle-Wittmann, Clemens Aigner, Konrad Hoetzenecker, Thomas Wekerle, Nina Worel, Robert Knobler, Peter Jaksch","doi":"10.1183/13993003.00733-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Lung transplant recipients have the worst long-term outcomes of all solid organs due to acute rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of ECP as a prophylactic treatment to prevent acute cellular rejection (ACR), CMV infections and reduce the risk of CLAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at Medical University of Vienna between 2018 and 2020. It included 31 COPD recipients per group. Treatment group underwent extracorporeal photopheresis in addition to standard triple-drug immunosuppression protocol after lung transplantation. Control group received standard triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy. The primary outcome was a composite outcome defined as incidence of high-grade ACR, CMV infection or CLAD within 24 months after lung transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the control group, 19 patients (61.3%) achieved the primary combined endpoint, compared with only 6 patients (19.4%) in the treatment group (p<0.001). Freedom from high-grade ACR was significantly greater in the ECP group (p=0.045). Cumulative A scores were significantly lower in the ECP group than in the control group at 3 months (0.18±0.44 <i>versus</i> 0.56±0.94, p<0.05) and at 12 months (0.25±0.48 <i>versus</i> 1.0±1.45, p=0.002). The rate of infections was lower in the ECP group with 5 cases and 67 cumulative hospital days compared to 22 cases and 309 days in the control group (p=0.002). Freedom from CLAD at three years was significantly greater in the ECP group (p=0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding ECP to standard triple immunosuppression resulted in a significant reduction of the number of ACR episodes and significantly lower incidence of CLAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12265,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00733-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Lung transplant recipients have the worst long-term outcomes of all solid organs due to acute rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of ECP as a prophylactic treatment to prevent acute cellular rejection (ACR), CMV infections and reduce the risk of CLAD.

Methods: Single-center prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at Medical University of Vienna between 2018 and 2020. It included 31 COPD recipients per group. Treatment group underwent extracorporeal photopheresis in addition to standard triple-drug immunosuppression protocol after lung transplantation. Control group received standard triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy. The primary outcome was a composite outcome defined as incidence of high-grade ACR, CMV infection or CLAD within 24 months after lung transplantation.

Results: In the control group, 19 patients (61.3%) achieved the primary combined endpoint, compared with only 6 patients (19.4%) in the treatment group (p<0.001). Freedom from high-grade ACR was significantly greater in the ECP group (p=0.045). Cumulative A scores were significantly lower in the ECP group than in the control group at 3 months (0.18±0.44 versus 0.56±0.94, p<0.05) and at 12 months (0.25±0.48 versus 1.0±1.45, p=0.002). The rate of infections was lower in the ECP group with 5 cases and 67 cumulative hospital days compared to 22 cases and 309 days in the control group (p=0.002). Freedom from CLAD at three years was significantly greater in the ECP group (p=0.015).

Conclusion: Adding ECP to standard triple immunosuppression resulted in a significant reduction of the number of ACR episodes and significantly lower incidence of CLAD.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) is the flagship journal of the European Respiratory Society. It has a current impact factor of 24.9. The journal covers various aspects of adult and paediatric respiratory medicine, including cell biology, epidemiology, immunology, oncology, pathophysiology, imaging, occupational medicine, intensive care, sleep medicine, and thoracic surgery. In addition to original research material, the ERJ publishes editorial commentaries, reviews, short research letters, and correspondence to the editor. The articles are published continuously and collected into 12 monthly issues in two volumes per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信