Effect of CAD/CAM Abutment Morphology on the Outcomes of Implant Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Christopher A Barwacz, Madeline Swenson, Emilio Couso-Queiruga, Carissa Comnick, Xian Jin Xie, Gustavo Avila-Ortiz
{"title":"Effect of CAD/CAM Abutment Morphology on the Outcomes of Implant Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Christopher A Barwacz, Madeline Swenson, Emilio Couso-Queiruga, Carissa Comnick, Xian Jin Xie, Gustavo Avila-Ortiz","doi":"10.1111/clr.14389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Variations in transmucosal abutment contour design may affect the outcomes of implant therapy. This randomized controlled trial was primarily aimed at testing the effect that CAD/CAM zirconia abutments with either a concave or linear divergent transmucosal morphology have on peri-implant mucosal dynamics and indicators of peri-implant health at 1 year after final implant-supported prosthesis insertion in the anterior maxilla.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Following computer-guided implant placement and osseointegration, eligible subjects were randomized into either the experimental (concave morphology) or the control (linear divergent morphology) group. A comprehensive set of outcomes of interest related to peri-implant soft tissue dynamics, phenotypical features, and indicators of peri-implant health were assessed at different time points over a 1-year period after insertion of the final restoration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 60 initially recruited subjects, a total of 54 completed the study (n = 29 in the experimental group concave/n = 25 in the control group). Overall implant survival and restoration rates between master impression and 12 months were 100% and 98.2%, respectively. Although a trend for coronal migration of the buccal mucosa zenith, gain in mucosal thickness, and increased probing depth and bleeding on probing was observed in both groups, these changes were clinically negligible, and no substantial differences were observed between study groups regardless of variations in transmucosal abutment morphology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of either linear divergent or concave custom CAD/CAM zirconia abutments in a screw-retained, delayed loading approach yielded no significant differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14389","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Variations in transmucosal abutment contour design may affect the outcomes of implant therapy. This randomized controlled trial was primarily aimed at testing the effect that CAD/CAM zirconia abutments with either a concave or linear divergent transmucosal morphology have on peri-implant mucosal dynamics and indicators of peri-implant health at 1 year after final implant-supported prosthesis insertion in the anterior maxilla.

Materials and methods: Following computer-guided implant placement and osseointegration, eligible subjects were randomized into either the experimental (concave morphology) or the control (linear divergent morphology) group. A comprehensive set of outcomes of interest related to peri-implant soft tissue dynamics, phenotypical features, and indicators of peri-implant health were assessed at different time points over a 1-year period after insertion of the final restoration.

Results: Out of 60 initially recruited subjects, a total of 54 completed the study (n = 29 in the experimental group concave/n = 25 in the control group). Overall implant survival and restoration rates between master impression and 12 months were 100% and 98.2%, respectively. Although a trend for coronal migration of the buccal mucosa zenith, gain in mucosal thickness, and increased probing depth and bleeding on probing was observed in both groups, these changes were clinically negligible, and no substantial differences were observed between study groups regardless of variations in transmucosal abutment morphology.

Conclusion: The use of either linear divergent or concave custom CAD/CAM zirconia abutments in a screw-retained, delayed loading approach yielded no significant differences.

CAD/CAM基牙形态对种植体治疗结果的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:不同的粘膜基台轮廓设计可能会影响种植体治疗的结果。本随机对照试验的主要目的是测试在上颌前牙最终植入种植体支持的假体1年后,经黏膜形态呈凹形或线性发散的CAD/CAM氧化锆基牙对种植体周围粘膜动力学和种植体周围健康指标的影响。材料和方法:在计算机引导下种植体植入和骨整合后,将符合条件的受试者随机分为实验组(凹形组)和对照组(线性发散组)。在植入最终修复体后1年的不同时间点,对与种植体周围软组织动力学、表型特征和种植体周围健康指标相关的综合结果进行了评估。结果:在最初招募的60名受试者中,共有54人完成了研究(实验组n = 29,对照组n = 25)。主印模和12个月间种植体整体存活率和修复率分别为100%和98.2%。尽管在两组中均观察到口腔黏膜顶冠状迁移、粘膜厚度增加、探诊深度增加和探诊时出血的趋势,但这些变化在临床上可以忽略不计,并且无论跨粘膜基台形态的变化如何,研究组之间没有观察到实质性差异。结论:使用线性发散型或凹型定制CAD/CAM氧化锆基牙进行螺钉保留,延迟加载方法无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.60%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信