Where Should the Cancer Control Interventions Target: A Geospatial Hotspot Analysis for Major Cancer Mortality 2018 to 2022 in the United States.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Chongliang Luo, Saira Khan, Liyan Jin, Aimee S James, Graham A Colditz, Bettina F Drake
{"title":"Where Should the Cancer Control Interventions Target: A Geospatial Hotspot Analysis for Major Cancer Mortality 2018 to 2022 in the United States.","authors":"Chongliang Luo, Saira Khan, Liyan Jin, Aimee S James, Graham A Colditz, Bettina F Drake","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying changes in geographic disparities of cancer mortality reveals locations where cancer prevention and control efforts should be focused/targeted. We use recent cancer surveillance data to demonstrate the geographic disparity of major cancer mortality rates in the United States and its shift compared with previous data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used the 2018 to 2022 county-level mortality rates of colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancers from the Centers for Disease Control mortality data. Counties with suppressed death counts were imputed by spatial regression models. Getis-Ord Gi* statistics were used to evaluate the spatial clustering of county mortality. Identified hotspot counties were visualized and compared with literature for hotspot pattern change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,108 US mainland counties were included. Cancer mortality rates were significantly higher in 244 counties for colorectal, 456 for lung, 147 for breast, and 180 for prostate cancers. Hotspot areas were central Appalachia (colorectal and lung cancers), Lower Mississippi Delta (colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers), Midwest (colorectal and lung cancers), north Michigan/Wisconsin (lung and prostate cancers), north Florida (lung cancer), and the West (prostate cancer).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>West central Appalachia and Lower Mississippi Delta continue to be hotspots for major cancer types, whereas previously identified eastern North Carolina/Virginia hotspots shrunk, east Oklahoma and North Florida emerged as new hotspots for lung cancer, and several hotspots emerged in the West for prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study updated the analyses for geospatial disparity in major cancer mortality since 2018, illustrating recent changes in the disparity pattern and pinpointing areas that cancer prevention and control efforts should target.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1074-1079"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0957","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying changes in geographic disparities of cancer mortality reveals locations where cancer prevention and control efforts should be focused/targeted. We use recent cancer surveillance data to demonstrate the geographic disparity of major cancer mortality rates in the United States and its shift compared with previous data.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used the 2018 to 2022 county-level mortality rates of colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancers from the Centers for Disease Control mortality data. Counties with suppressed death counts were imputed by spatial regression models. Getis-Ord Gi* statistics were used to evaluate the spatial clustering of county mortality. Identified hotspot counties were visualized and compared with literature for hotspot pattern change.

Results: A total of 3,108 US mainland counties were included. Cancer mortality rates were significantly higher in 244 counties for colorectal, 456 for lung, 147 for breast, and 180 for prostate cancers. Hotspot areas were central Appalachia (colorectal and lung cancers), Lower Mississippi Delta (colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers), Midwest (colorectal and lung cancers), north Michigan/Wisconsin (lung and prostate cancers), north Florida (lung cancer), and the West (prostate cancer).

Conclusions: West central Appalachia and Lower Mississippi Delta continue to be hotspots for major cancer types, whereas previously identified eastern North Carolina/Virginia hotspots shrunk, east Oklahoma and North Florida emerged as new hotspots for lung cancer, and several hotspots emerged in the West for prostate cancer.

Impact: This study updated the analyses for geospatial disparity in major cancer mortality since 2018, illustrating recent changes in the disparity pattern and pinpointing areas that cancer prevention and control efforts should target.

癌症控制干预的目标应该在哪里:2018-2022年美国主要癌症死亡率的地理空间热点分析
背景:确定癌症死亡率地理差异的变化揭示了癌症预防和控制工作应该集中/有针对性的地点。我们使用最近的癌症监测数据来证明美国主要癌症死亡率的地理差异及其与以前数据相比的变化。方法:本横断面研究使用CDC死亡率数据中2018-2022年县级结直肠癌、肺癌、乳腺癌和前列腺癌的死亡率。采用空间回归模型估算具有抑制死亡计数的县。采用Getis-Ord Gi*统计方法评价县域死亡率的空间聚类。对已确定的热点县进行可视化,并与文献进行热点格局变化对比。结果:共纳入美国大陆3108个县。244个县的结直肠癌、456个县的肺癌、147个县的乳腺癌和180个县的前列腺癌的死亡率都明显更高。热点地区为阿巴拉契亚中部(结肠直肠和肺部)、下密西西比三角洲(结肠直肠、乳房和前列腺)、中西部(结肠直肠和肺部)、北密歇根州/威斯康星州(肺和前列腺)、北佛罗里达州(肺)和西部(前列腺)。结论:中西部阿巴拉契亚地区和下密西西比三角洲地区仍然是主要癌症类型的热点地区,而先前确定的东部北卡罗来纳州/弗吉尼亚州热点地区缩小,俄克拉荷马州东部和佛罗里达州北部成为肺癌的新热点,西部出现了一些前列腺癌的热点地区。影响:本研究更新了自2018年以来主要癌症死亡率的地理空间差异分析,说明了差异模式的最新变化,并指出了癌症预防和控制工作应该针对的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信