Effects of phytase and 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol supplementation in broilers fed calcium-phosphorous deficient diets, with or without Eimeria challenge, on growth performance, body composition, bone development, and gut health.

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animal Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-09-28 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aninu.2024.07.006
Hanyi Shi, Venkata S R Choppa, Deependra Paneru, Woo K Kim
{"title":"Effects of phytase and 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol supplementation in broilers fed calcium-phosphorous deficient diets, with or without <i>Eimeria</i> challenge, on growth performance, body composition, bone development, and gut health.","authors":"Hanyi Shi, Venkata S R Choppa, Deependra Paneru, Woo K Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.aninu.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study evaluated the effects of nutritional strategies on broilers challenged with <i>Eimeria</i> from d 14 to 26. A total of 840 Cobb male broilers were fed five diets in a 2 × 5 factorial arrangement: 1) nutrient adequate diet (PC; 0.84% calcium [Ca], 0.42% available phosphorus [avP]); 2) Ca-P deficient diet (NC; 0.64% Ca, 0.22% avP); 3) NC + 1500 FTU/kg phytase of diet (NC + PHY); 4) NC + 5000 IU/kg 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol of diet (NC + 25OHD); and 5) NC with both supplements (NC + PHY + 25OHD), with and without <i>Eimeria</i> challenge. All treatments had six replicate cages with 14 birds per cage. At 5 days post inoculation (DPI), the challenged birds exhibited higher serum fluorescein isothiocyanate-d (FITC-d) levels than the unchallenged birds (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The NC + PHY and NC + PHY + 25OHD groups exhibited lower FITC-d levels compared to the NC + 25OHD group (<i>P</i> = 0.012). Significant interaction effects between <i>Eimeria</i> challenge and dietary treatments were observed on various parameters. During 0 to 6 and 0 to 12 DPI, <i>Eimeria</i> challenge resulted in decreased the body weight gain (BWG) (<i>P</i> < 0.05) but had a negative effect on the feed conversion ratio (FCR) in birds compared to the unchallenged group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Reducing Ca and avP levels in the diet (NC) did not adversely affect BWG, but negatively impacted FCR, bone ash weight, ash concentration, and femur bone microstructure parameters (<i>P</i> < 0.05). On 12 DPI, <i>Eimeria</i> challenge led to decreased tibia bone weight, bone volume, fat-free bone weight (FFBW), and ash weight of birds (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Supplementation with phytase alone or in combination with 25OHD improved growth performance, gut permeability, bone ash and bone microstructure parameters in birds (<i>P</i> < 0.05). However, the group fed 25OHD alone showed enhancements on growth performance, mineral apposition rate (MAR), bone ash concentration and ash percentage of the birds (<i>P</i> < 0.05). In conclusion, lowering Ca and avP levels in the diet negatively affected FCR and bone development but did not affect intestinal integrity in broilers. Dietary supplementation of phytase, 25OHD, or phytase in combination of 25OHD could enhance the growth performance and bone quality of broilers infected with <i>Eimeria</i>. Notably, the benefits of phytase supplementation were generally more pronounced than those associated with 25OHD supplementation; however, the combination of phytase and 25OHD could induce optimum effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":8184,"journal":{"name":"Animal Nutrition","volume":"19 ","pages":"411-428"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2024.07.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study evaluated the effects of nutritional strategies on broilers challenged with Eimeria from d 14 to 26. A total of 840 Cobb male broilers were fed five diets in a 2 × 5 factorial arrangement: 1) nutrient adequate diet (PC; 0.84% calcium [Ca], 0.42% available phosphorus [avP]); 2) Ca-P deficient diet (NC; 0.64% Ca, 0.22% avP); 3) NC + 1500 FTU/kg phytase of diet (NC + PHY); 4) NC + 5000 IU/kg 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol of diet (NC + 25OHD); and 5) NC with both supplements (NC + PHY + 25OHD), with and without Eimeria challenge. All treatments had six replicate cages with 14 birds per cage. At 5 days post inoculation (DPI), the challenged birds exhibited higher serum fluorescein isothiocyanate-d (FITC-d) levels than the unchallenged birds (P < 0.001). The NC + PHY and NC + PHY + 25OHD groups exhibited lower FITC-d levels compared to the NC + 25OHD group (P = 0.012). Significant interaction effects between Eimeria challenge and dietary treatments were observed on various parameters. During 0 to 6 and 0 to 12 DPI, Eimeria challenge resulted in decreased the body weight gain (BWG) (P < 0.05) but had a negative effect on the feed conversion ratio (FCR) in birds compared to the unchallenged group (P < 0.05). Reducing Ca and avP levels in the diet (NC) did not adversely affect BWG, but negatively impacted FCR, bone ash weight, ash concentration, and femur bone microstructure parameters (P < 0.05). On 12 DPI, Eimeria challenge led to decreased tibia bone weight, bone volume, fat-free bone weight (FFBW), and ash weight of birds (P < 0.05). Supplementation with phytase alone or in combination with 25OHD improved growth performance, gut permeability, bone ash and bone microstructure parameters in birds (P < 0.05). However, the group fed 25OHD alone showed enhancements on growth performance, mineral apposition rate (MAR), bone ash concentration and ash percentage of the birds (P < 0.05). In conclusion, lowering Ca and avP levels in the diet negatively affected FCR and bone development but did not affect intestinal integrity in broilers. Dietary supplementation of phytase, 25OHD, or phytase in combination of 25OHD could enhance the growth performance and bone quality of broilers infected with Eimeria. Notably, the benefits of phytase supplementation were generally more pronounced than those associated with 25OHD supplementation; however, the combination of phytase and 25OHD could induce optimum effects.

饲粮中添加植酸酶和25-羟基胆钙化醇对肉仔鸡生长性能、体成分、骨骼发育和肠道健康的影响,无论是否有艾美耳球虫攻击。
本研究评价了14 ~ 26日龄艾美耳虫攻毒肉鸡营养策略的影响。采用2 × 5因子试验设计,选取840只科布肉鸡公鸡饲喂5种饲粮:1)营养充足饲粮(PC;0.84%钙[Ca], 0.42%有效磷[avP]);2)缺钙磷日粮;0.64% Ca, 0.22% avP);3) NC + 1500 FTU/kg饲粮植酸酶(NC + PHY);4) NC + 5000 IU/kg 25-羟基胆骨化醇(NC + 25OHD);5)两种补充物(NC + PHY + 25OHD)的NC,有和没有艾美球虫刺激。所有处理设置6个重复笼,每个笼14只鸟。接种后5 d,攻毒组血清荧光素异硫氰酸酯d (FITC-d)水平高于未攻毒组(P P = 0.012)。艾美耳球虫攻毒与饲粮处理在各参数上存在显著的互作效应。在0 ~ 6 DPI和0 ~ 12 DPI期间,鸭体增重(BWG) (P P P)降低,鸭胫骨骨量、骨体积、无脂骨量(FFBW)和灰分重(P P P艾美耳球虫)降低。值得注意的是,补充植酸酶的益处通常比补充25OHD的益处更明显;植酸酶与25OHD联合使用效果最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Nutrition
Animal Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Nutrition encompasses the full gamut of animal nutritional sciences and reviews including, but not limited to, fundamental aspects of animal nutrition such as nutritional requirements, metabolic studies, body composition, energetics, immunology, neuroscience, microbiology, genetics and molecular and cell biology related to nutrition, and more applied aspects of animal nutrition, such as raw material evaluation, feed additives, nutritive value of novel ingredients and feed safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信