{"title":"The impact of delay from diagnosis to surgery in endometrial cancer.","authors":"Dimitrios Zouzoulas, Dimitrios Tsolakidis, Tilemachos Karalis, Michalis Aristotelidis, Maria Topalidou, Grigorios Grimbizis","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07855-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>When oncological waiting lists are prolonged, gynecological oncology units are forced to delay operations, especially for endometrial cancer (EC) due to its good prognosis among gynecological cancers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of delay in the oncological outcomes of these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of all women with EC treated in our clinic, 2012-2019. Delay was calculated as the time interval between histological diagnosis of endometrial biopsy and definite surgery. The cutoff point was set at 8 weeks. Patients' characteristics, treatment options and follow-up information were collected. Primary outcomes were the need of adjuvant treatment and survival rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>259 Patients met the inclusion criteria. Based on the 8-week cutoff point, patients were divided into 2 groups: 119 underwent surgery up to 8 weeks (group A) and 140 over 8 weeks (group B). There was no statistical difference in the FIGO stage or the preoperative CA-125 levels between the two groups. However, patients in group A were younger, with lower body mass index (BMI) and less comorbidities. Furthermore, patients in group B had a significantly higher probability of receiving pelvic radiation with or without brachytherapy (p = 0.0053). Concerning survival rates, there was a statistically difference in disease-free (p = 0.0312), but no difference was found in overall survival (p = 0.146).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delaying EC surgery over 8 weeks may not have an impact on the mortality of the patients, but increases the need of adjuvant pelvic radiation and worsens recurrence rates. As a result, patients experience more side effects which subsequently had negative impact on their quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07855-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: When oncological waiting lists are prolonged, gynecological oncology units are forced to delay operations, especially for endometrial cancer (EC) due to its good prognosis among gynecological cancers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of delay in the oncological outcomes of these patients.
Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all women with EC treated in our clinic, 2012-2019. Delay was calculated as the time interval between histological diagnosis of endometrial biopsy and definite surgery. The cutoff point was set at 8 weeks. Patients' characteristics, treatment options and follow-up information were collected. Primary outcomes were the need of adjuvant treatment and survival rates.
Results: 259 Patients met the inclusion criteria. Based on the 8-week cutoff point, patients were divided into 2 groups: 119 underwent surgery up to 8 weeks (group A) and 140 over 8 weeks (group B). There was no statistical difference in the FIGO stage or the preoperative CA-125 levels between the two groups. However, patients in group A were younger, with lower body mass index (BMI) and less comorbidities. Furthermore, patients in group B had a significantly higher probability of receiving pelvic radiation with or without brachytherapy (p = 0.0053). Concerning survival rates, there was a statistically difference in disease-free (p = 0.0312), but no difference was found in overall survival (p = 0.146).
Conclusion: Delaying EC surgery over 8 weeks may not have an impact on the mortality of the patients, but increases the need of adjuvant pelvic radiation and worsens recurrence rates. As a result, patients experience more side effects which subsequently had negative impact on their quality of life.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report".
The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.