The impact of delay from diagnosis to surgery in endometrial cancer.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Dimitrios Zouzoulas, Dimitrios Tsolakidis, Tilemachos Karalis, Michalis Aristotelidis, Maria Topalidou, Grigorios Grimbizis
{"title":"The impact of delay from diagnosis to surgery in endometrial cancer.","authors":"Dimitrios Zouzoulas, Dimitrios Tsolakidis, Tilemachos Karalis, Michalis Aristotelidis, Maria Topalidou, Grigorios Grimbizis","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07855-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>When oncological waiting lists are prolonged, gynecological oncology units are forced to delay operations, especially for endometrial cancer (EC) due to its good prognosis among gynecological cancers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of delay in the oncological outcomes of these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of all women with EC treated in our clinic, 2012-2019. Delay was calculated as the time interval between histological diagnosis of endometrial biopsy and definite surgery. The cutoff point was set at 8 weeks. Patients' characteristics, treatment options and follow-up information were collected. Primary outcomes were the need of adjuvant treatment and survival rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>259 Patients met the inclusion criteria. Based on the 8-week cutoff point, patients were divided into 2 groups: 119 underwent surgery up to 8 weeks (group A) and 140 over 8 weeks (group B). There was no statistical difference in the FIGO stage or the preoperative CA-125 levels between the two groups. However, patients in group A were younger, with lower body mass index (BMI) and less comorbidities. Furthermore, patients in group B had a significantly higher probability of receiving pelvic radiation with or without brachytherapy (p = 0.0053). Concerning survival rates, there was a statistically difference in disease-free (p = 0.0312), but no difference was found in overall survival (p = 0.146).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delaying EC surgery over 8 weeks may not have an impact on the mortality of the patients, but increases the need of adjuvant pelvic radiation and worsens recurrence rates. As a result, patients experience more side effects which subsequently had negative impact on their quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07855-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: When oncological waiting lists are prolonged, gynecological oncology units are forced to delay operations, especially for endometrial cancer (EC) due to its good prognosis among gynecological cancers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of delay in the oncological outcomes of these patients.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all women with EC treated in our clinic, 2012-2019. Delay was calculated as the time interval between histological diagnosis of endometrial biopsy and definite surgery. The cutoff point was set at 8 weeks. Patients' characteristics, treatment options and follow-up information were collected. Primary outcomes were the need of adjuvant treatment and survival rates.

Results: 259 Patients met the inclusion criteria. Based on the 8-week cutoff point, patients were divided into 2 groups: 119 underwent surgery up to 8 weeks (group A) and 140 over 8 weeks (group B). There was no statistical difference in the FIGO stage or the preoperative CA-125 levels between the two groups. However, patients in group A were younger, with lower body mass index (BMI) and less comorbidities. Furthermore, patients in group B had a significantly higher probability of receiving pelvic radiation with or without brachytherapy (p = 0.0053). Concerning survival rates, there was a statistically difference in disease-free (p = 0.0312), but no difference was found in overall survival (p = 0.146).

Conclusion: Delaying EC surgery over 8 weeks may not have an impact on the mortality of the patients, but increases the need of adjuvant pelvic radiation and worsens recurrence rates. As a result, patients experience more side effects which subsequently had negative impact on their quality of life.

子宫内膜癌从诊断到手术延迟的影响。
目的:当肿瘤等待名单延长时,妇科肿瘤单位被迫推迟手术,特别是子宫内膜癌(EC)由于其在妇科癌症中预后较好。本研究的目的是评估延迟对这些患者肿瘤预后的影响。方法:回顾性分析2012-2019年在我院接受治疗的所有女性EC患者。延迟计算为子宫内膜活检的组织学诊断和明确手术之间的时间间隔。截止时间为8周。收集患者特征、治疗方案及随访信息。主要结局是辅助治疗的需要和生存率。结果:259例患者符合纳入标准。根据8周截断点将患者分为两组,A组手术至8周119例,B组8周以上140例。两组FIGO分期及术前CA-125水平比较无统计学差异。然而,A组患者较年轻,体重指数(BMI)较低,合并症较少。此外,B组患者接受盆腔放疗伴或不伴近距离放疗的概率显著高于B组(p = 0.0053)。生存率方面,无病生存率差异有统计学意义(p = 0.0312),总生存率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.146)。结论:延迟EC手术超过8周可能对患者的死亡率没有影响,但增加了盆腔辅助放疗的需要,增加了复发率。因此,患者会经历更多的副作用,这些副作用随后会对他们的生活质量产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信