Cleaving the way for heterologous peptide production: An overview of cleavage strategies.

IF 4.2 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Karen Ofuji Osiro, Harry Morales Duque, Kamila Botelho Sampaio de Oliveira, Nadielle Tamires Moreira Melo, Letícia Ferreira Lima, Hugo Costa Paes, Octavio Luiz Franco
{"title":"Cleaving the way for heterologous peptide production: An overview of cleavage strategies.","authors":"Karen Ofuji Osiro, Harry Morales Duque, Kamila Botelho Sampaio de Oliveira, Nadielle Tamires Moreira Melo, Letícia Ferreira Lima, Hugo Costa Paes, Octavio Luiz Franco","doi":"10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the main bottlenecks for recombinant peptide production is choosing the proper cleavage method to remove fusion protein tags from target peptides. While these tags are crucial for inhibiting the activity of the target peptide during heterologous expression, incorporating a cleavage site is essential for their later removal, ensuring the pure sequencing of the peptide. This review evaluates different cleavage methods, including protease-mediated, self-cleavable protein, and chemical-mediated sites, regarding their advantages and limitations. For instance, intein, N<sup>pro</sup> EDDIE, enterokinase, factor Xa, SUMO, and CNBr are options for residue-free cleavage. Although protease-mediated cleavage is widely used, it can be expensive, due to its own cost added to the whole process. As an alternative, self-cleavable sites eliminate the requirement for proteinases. Another crucial step in defining the proper cleavage method is cost consideration, which relates to the purpose of peptide production. Here, we explore a range of cleavage approaches, meeting the needs of both cost-constrained applications and a more flexible budget. Overall, selecting the most suitable cleavage method should be based on careful consideration of toxicity, cost, accuracy, and specific application requirements to ensure a state-of-the-art approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":390,"journal":{"name":"Methods","volume":" ","pages":"36-44"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.12.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the main bottlenecks for recombinant peptide production is choosing the proper cleavage method to remove fusion protein tags from target peptides. While these tags are crucial for inhibiting the activity of the target peptide during heterologous expression, incorporating a cleavage site is essential for their later removal, ensuring the pure sequencing of the peptide. This review evaluates different cleavage methods, including protease-mediated, self-cleavable protein, and chemical-mediated sites, regarding their advantages and limitations. For instance, intein, Npro EDDIE, enterokinase, factor Xa, SUMO, and CNBr are options for residue-free cleavage. Although protease-mediated cleavage is widely used, it can be expensive, due to its own cost added to the whole process. As an alternative, self-cleavable sites eliminate the requirement for proteinases. Another crucial step in defining the proper cleavage method is cost consideration, which relates to the purpose of peptide production. Here, we explore a range of cleavage approaches, meeting the needs of both cost-constrained applications and a more flexible budget. Overall, selecting the most suitable cleavage method should be based on careful consideration of toxicity, cost, accuracy, and specific application requirements to ensure a state-of-the-art approach.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods
Methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
2.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
11.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Methods focuses on rapidly developing techniques in the experimental biological and medical sciences. Each topical issue, organized by a guest editor who is an expert in the area covered, consists solely of invited quality articles by specialist authors, many of them reviews. Issues are devoted to specific technical approaches with emphasis on clear detailed descriptions of protocols that allow them to be reproduced easily. The background information provided enables researchers to understand the principles underlying the methods; other helpful sections include comparisons of alternative methods giving the advantages and disadvantages of particular methods, guidance on avoiding potential pitfalls, and suggestions for troubleshooting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信