{"title":"Correction to “The ‘LSVEC problem’ for the Vienna Peedee belemnite carbon isotope-delta scale”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/rcm.9962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\n <span>Dunn, PJH</span>, <span>Camin, F</span>. <span>The ‘LSVE problem’ for the Vienna Peedee belemnite carbon isotope-delta scale</span>. <i>Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom</i>. <span>2024</span>; <span>38</span>(<span>17</span>):e9841. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9841.\n </p><p>The authors have been made aware of some errors in referencing as well as inclusion of data considered unpublished within Figure 3 of the article entitled “<i>The “LSVEC problem” for the Vienna Peedee belemnite carbon isotope-delta scale</i>” (RCM 28 e9841) [1]. These errors include the following:</p><p>Firstly, the data series named “Assonov et al (2015)” within Figure 3 should not have been included as it is considered unpublished data. This error does not alter the discussion surrounding the assigned isotope delta value of LSVEC within the text linked to the figure. A correct version of the Figure with caption is given here (reference numbering as per the original article):</p><p>The third paragraph of Section 5.4 of the paper (entitled “Proposal 2 – maintain only the VPDB scale and remove LSVEC entirely”) also has incorrect citations in the final parenthesis. This should read “<i>(see e.g. Table 9 of Qi et al</i> [18] <i>and Hélie et al</i> [19],<i>)</i>.” These errors were inadvertently introduced during typesetting and unfortunately not corrected during proofing.</p><p>The authors wish to thank Sergey Assonov for bringing most of these errors to their attention and apologise for any inconvenience caused.</p><p>\n 1. <span>P. J. H. Dunn</span> and <span>F. Camin</span>, “ <span>The ‘LSVEC problem’ for the Vienna Peedee belemnite carbon isotope-delta scale</span>,” <i>Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry</i>. <span>38</span>, no. <span>17</span> (<span>2024</span>): e9841, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9841.\n </p><p>\n 8. <span>T. B. Coplen</span>, <span>W. A. Brand</span>, <span>M. Gehre</span>, et al., “ <span>New Guidelines for δ13C Measurements</span>,” <i>Analytical Chemistry</i> <span>78</span>, no. <span>7</span> (<span>2006</span>): <span>2439</span>–<span>2441</span>, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac052027c.\n </p><p>\n 13. <span>P. Ghosh</span>, <span>M. Patecki</span>, <span>M. Rothe</span>, and <span>W. A. Brand</span>, “ <span>Calcite-CO2 mixed into CO2-free air: a new CO2-in-air stable isotope reference material for the VPDB scale</span>,” <i>Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry</i>. <span>19</span>, no. <span>8</span> (<span>2005</span>): <span>1097</span>–<span>1119</span>, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1886.\n </p><p>\n 14. <span>R. M. Verkouteren</span> and <span>D. B. Klinedinst</span>, <span>Value Assignment and Uncertainty Estimation of Selected Light Stable Isotope Reference Materials: RMs 8543–8545, RMs 8562–8564, and RM 8566</span> (National Institute of Standards and Technology, <span>2004</span>).\n </p><p>\n 15. <span>H. Qi</span>, <span>T. B. Coplen</span>, <span>H. Geilmann</span>, <span>W. A. Brand</span>, and <span>J. K. Böhlke</span>, “ <span>Two new organic reference materials for δ13C and δ15N measurements and a new value for the δ13C of NBS 22 oil</span>,” <i>Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry</i>. <span>17</span>, no. <span>22</span> (<span>2003</span>): <span>2483</span>–<span>2487</span>, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1219.\n </p><p>\n 16. <span>W. Stichler</span>, “ <span>Interlaboratory comparison of new materials for carbon and oxygen isotope ratio measurements</span>,” in <span>Reference and Intercomparison Materials for Stable Isotopes of Light Elements. Vol TECDOC 825</span> (IAEA, <span>1995</span>), <span>67</span>–<span>74</span>.\n </p><p>\n 18. <span>H. Qi</span>, <span>T. B. Coplen</span>, <span>S. J. Mroczkowski</span>, et al., “ <span>A new organic reference material, l-glutamic acid, USGS41a, for δ13C and δ15N measurements − a replacement for USGS41</span>,” <i>Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry</i> <span>30</span>, no. <span>7</span> (<span>2016</span>): <span>859</span>–<span>866</span>, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7510.\n </p><p>\n 19. <span>J. F. Hélie</span>, <span>A. Adamowicz-Walczak</span>, <span>P. Middlestead</span>, <span>M. M. G. Chartrand</span>, <span>Z. Mester</span>, and <span>J. Meija</span>, “ <span>Discontinuity in the Realization of the Vienna Peedee Belemnite Carbon Isotope Ratio Scale</span>,” <i>Analytical Chemistry</i> <span>93</span>, no. <span>31</span> (<span>2021</span>): <span>10740</span>–<span>10743</span>, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02458.\n </p><p>\n 20. <span>S. Assonov</span>, “ <span>Summary and recommendations from the International Atomic Energy Agency technical meeting on the development of stable isotope reference products (21–25 November 2016)</span>,” <i>Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry</i> <span>32</span>, no. <span>10</span> (<span>2018</span>): <span>827</span>–<span>830</span>, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8102.\n </p><p>\n 25. <span>S. Assonov</span>, <span>M. Groening</span>, <span>A. Fajgelj</span>, <span>J. F. Hélie</span>, and <span>C. Hillaire-Marcel</span>, “ <span>Preparation and characterization of IAEA-603, a new primary reference material aimed at the VPDB scale realisation for δ13C and δ18O determination</span>,” <i>Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry</i> <span>34</span>, no. <span>20</span> (<span>2020</span>): e8867, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8867.\n </p><p>\n 26. <span>S. Assonov</span>, <span>A. Fajgelj</span>, <span>J. F. Hélie</span>, <span>C. Allison</span>, and <span>M. Gröning</span>, “ <span>Characterisation of new reference materials IAEA-610, IAEA-611 and IAEA-612 aimed at the VPDB δ13C scale realisation with small uncertainty</span>,” <i>Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry</i> <span>35</span>, no. <span>7</span> (<span>2021</span>): e9014, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9014.\n </p><p>\n 27. <span>S. Assonov</span>, <span>A. Fajgelj</span>, <span>C. Allison</span>, and <span>M. Gröning</span>, “ <span>On the metrological traceability and hierarchy of stable isotope reference materials aimed at realisation of the VPDB scale: revision of the VPDB δ13C scale based on multipoint scale-anchoring RMs</span>,” <i>Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry</i> <span>35</span>, no. <span>8</span> (<span>2021</span>): e9018, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9018.\n </p>","PeriodicalId":225,"journal":{"name":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/rcm.9962","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcm.9962","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dunn, PJH, Camin, F. The ‘LSVE problem’ for the Vienna Peedee belemnite carbon isotope-delta scale. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2024; 38(17):e9841. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9841.
The authors have been made aware of some errors in referencing as well as inclusion of data considered unpublished within Figure 3 of the article entitled “The “LSVEC problem” for the Vienna Peedee belemnite carbon isotope-delta scale” (RCM 28 e9841) [1]. These errors include the following:
Firstly, the data series named “Assonov et al (2015)” within Figure 3 should not have been included as it is considered unpublished data. This error does not alter the discussion surrounding the assigned isotope delta value of LSVEC within the text linked to the figure. A correct version of the Figure with caption is given here (reference numbering as per the original article):
The third paragraph of Section 5.4 of the paper (entitled “Proposal 2 – maintain only the VPDB scale and remove LSVEC entirely”) also has incorrect citations in the final parenthesis. This should read “(see e.g. Table 9 of Qi et al [18] and Hélie et al [19],).” These errors were inadvertently introduced during typesetting and unfortunately not corrected during proofing.
The authors wish to thank Sergey Assonov for bringing most of these errors to their attention and apologise for any inconvenience caused.
1. P. J. H. Dunn and F. Camin, “ The ‘LSVEC problem’ for the Vienna Peedee belemnite carbon isotope-delta scale,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 38, no. 17 (2024): e9841, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9841.
8. T. B. Coplen, W. A. Brand, M. Gehre, et al., “ New Guidelines for δ13C Measurements,” Analytical Chemistry78, no. 7 (2006): 2439–2441, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac052027c.
13. P. Ghosh, M. Patecki, M. Rothe, and W. A. Brand, “ Calcite-CO2 mixed into CO2-free air: a new CO2-in-air stable isotope reference material for the VPDB scale,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 19, no. 8 (2005): 1097–1119, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1886.
14. R. M. Verkouteren and D. B. Klinedinst, Value Assignment and Uncertainty Estimation of Selected Light Stable Isotope Reference Materials: RMs 8543–8545, RMs 8562–8564, and RM 8566 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2004).
15. H. Qi, T. B. Coplen, H. Geilmann, W. A. Brand, and J. K. Böhlke, “ Two new organic reference materials for δ13C and δ15N measurements and a new value for the δ13C of NBS 22 oil,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 17, no. 22 (2003): 2483–2487, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1219.
16. W. Stichler, “ Interlaboratory comparison of new materials for carbon and oxygen isotope ratio measurements,” in Reference and Intercomparison Materials for Stable Isotopes of Light Elements. Vol TECDOC 825 (IAEA, 1995), 67–74.
18. H. Qi, T. B. Coplen, S. J. Mroczkowski, et al., “ A new organic reference material, l-glutamic acid, USGS41a, for δ13C and δ15N measurements − a replacement for USGS41,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry30, no. 7 (2016): 859–866, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7510.
19. J. F. Hélie, A. Adamowicz-Walczak, P. Middlestead, M. M. G. Chartrand, Z. Mester, and J. Meija, “ Discontinuity in the Realization of the Vienna Peedee Belemnite Carbon Isotope Ratio Scale,” Analytical Chemistry93, no. 31 (2021): 10740–10743, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02458.
20. S. Assonov, “ Summary and recommendations from the International Atomic Energy Agency technical meeting on the development of stable isotope reference products (21–25 November 2016),” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry32, no. 10 (2018): 827–830, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8102.
25. S. Assonov, M. Groening, A. Fajgelj, J. F. Hélie, and C. Hillaire-Marcel, “ Preparation and characterization of IAEA-603, a new primary reference material aimed at the VPDB scale realisation for δ13C and δ18O determination,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry34, no. 20 (2020): e8867, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8867.
26. S. Assonov, A. Fajgelj, J. F. Hélie, C. Allison, and M. Gröning, “ Characterisation of new reference materials IAEA-610, IAEA-611 and IAEA-612 aimed at the VPDB δ13C scale realisation with small uncertainty,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry35, no. 7 (2021): e9014, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9014.
27. S. Assonov, A. Fajgelj, C. Allison, and M. Gröning, “ On the metrological traceability and hierarchy of stable isotope reference materials aimed at realisation of the VPDB scale: revision of the VPDB δ13C scale based on multipoint scale-anchoring RMs,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry35, no. 8 (2021): e9018, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9018.
期刊介绍:
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry is a journal whose aim is the rapid publication of original research results and ideas on all aspects of the science of gas-phase ions; it covers all the associated scientific disciplines. There is no formal limit on paper length ("rapid" is not synonymous with "brief"), but papers should be of a length that is commensurate with the importance and complexity of the results being reported. Contributions may be theoretical or practical in nature; they may deal with methods, techniques and applications, or with the interpretation of results; they may cover any area in science that depends directly on measurements made upon gaseous ions or that is associated with such measurements.