Opposite priming responses to labile carbon versus oxygen pulses in anoxic peat

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Namid Krüger, Klaus-Holger Knorr, Peter Mueller
{"title":"Opposite priming responses to labile carbon versus oxygen pulses in anoxic peat","authors":"Namid Krüger,&nbsp;Klaus-Holger Knorr,&nbsp;Peter Mueller","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vegetation shifts in peatlands might change the stability of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks via rhizosphere priming effects. However, mechanisms and magnitude of priming effects in peat soils are poorly understood. Beyond supplying C-rich root exudates - a central driver of priming in upland soils - wetland vascular plants supply oxygen to reducing soil systems.</div><div>We evaluated priming effects in anoxic peat soils driven by labile C-exudate inputs (glucose), oxygen inputs and their interaction. Using incubation experiments, we mimicked oxygen loss and exudation rates of wetland plants and separated peat SOC- and glucose-derived respiration rates using a C stable isotope approach.</div><div>Oxygen pulses and oxygen + glucose pulses stimulated SOC mineralization through positive priming of &gt; + 350% and &gt; + 200%, respectively. By contrast, glucose pulses alone caused negative priming, with the most negative effect (&lt; - 70%) at maximum glucose input. However, even glucose-C inputs smaller than the estimated microbial biomass C led to negative or no priming. Both positive and negative priming effects continued for several weeks after inputs stopped and increased in magnitude.</div><div>We demonstrate that labile C inputs into an anoxic soil can strongly suppress SOC mineralization, in contrast to positive priming effects often observed in oxic upland soils. We hypothesize that negative priming driven by preferential substrate usage is amplified in anoxic soils due to electron-acceptor exhaustion through exudate-fueled respiration. Our results imply that expansion of vascular plants into peatlands could stimulate SOC mineralization through root oxygen loss, while labile C inputs might stabilize SOC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 109682"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071724003742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vegetation shifts in peatlands might change the stability of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks via rhizosphere priming effects. However, mechanisms and magnitude of priming effects in peat soils are poorly understood. Beyond supplying C-rich root exudates - a central driver of priming in upland soils - wetland vascular plants supply oxygen to reducing soil systems.
We evaluated priming effects in anoxic peat soils driven by labile C-exudate inputs (glucose), oxygen inputs and their interaction. Using incubation experiments, we mimicked oxygen loss and exudation rates of wetland plants and separated peat SOC- and glucose-derived respiration rates using a C stable isotope approach.
Oxygen pulses and oxygen + glucose pulses stimulated SOC mineralization through positive priming of > + 350% and > + 200%, respectively. By contrast, glucose pulses alone caused negative priming, with the most negative effect (< - 70%) at maximum glucose input. However, even glucose-C inputs smaller than the estimated microbial biomass C led to negative or no priming. Both positive and negative priming effects continued for several weeks after inputs stopped and increased in magnitude.
We demonstrate that labile C inputs into an anoxic soil can strongly suppress SOC mineralization, in contrast to positive priming effects often observed in oxic upland soils. We hypothesize that negative priming driven by preferential substrate usage is amplified in anoxic soils due to electron-acceptor exhaustion through exudate-fueled respiration. Our results imply that expansion of vascular plants into peatlands could stimulate SOC mineralization through root oxygen loss, while labile C inputs might stabilize SOC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在缺氧泥炭中,对不稳定碳和氧脉冲的相反启动反应
泥炭地植被变化可能通过根际启动效应改变土壤有机碳储量的稳定性。然而,泥炭土中引发效应的机制和程度尚不清楚。湿地维管植物除了提供富含碳的根系分泌物——这是旱地土壤启动的主要驱动因素——还为还原性土壤系统提供氧气。我们评估了由碳渗出物输入(葡萄糖)、氧输入及其相互作用驱动的缺氧泥炭土的启动效应。通过培养实验,我们模拟了湿地植物的氧损失和渗出速率,并使用C稳定同位素方法分离了泥炭碳水化合物和葡萄糖来源的呼吸速率。氧脉冲和氧+葡萄糖脉冲通过正启动>刺激SOC矿化;+ 350%和>;分别+ 200%。相比之下,葡萄糖脉冲单独引起负启动,负效应最大(<;- 70%)。然而,即使葡萄糖-C输入小于估计的微生物生物量C,也会导致负启动或不启动。在输入停止后,正启动效应和负启动效应都持续了数周,并有所增加。研究表明,与在含氧旱地土壤中观察到的正启动效应相反,在缺氧土壤中输入的不稳定碳可以强烈抑制有机碳矿化。我们假设,由优先底物使用驱动的负启动在缺氧土壤中被放大,这是由于电子受体通过渗出燃料的呼吸耗尽。研究结果表明,维管植物在泥炭地的扩张可以通过根系氧损失刺激有机碳矿化,而不稳定的碳输入可能会稳定有机碳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信