[18F]FDG PET/CT Imaging and Hematological Parameters Can Help Predict HPV Status in Head and Neck Cancer.

Paulina Cegla, Geoffrey Currie, Joanna P Wroblewska, Joanna Kazmierska, Witold Cholewinski, Inga Jagiello, Krzysztof Matuszewski, Andrzej Marszalek, Anna Kubiak, Pawel Golusinski, Wojciech Golusinski, Ewa Majchrzak
{"title":"[18F]FDG PET/CT Imaging and Hematological Parameters Can Help Predict HPV Status in Head and Neck Cancer.","authors":"Paulina Cegla, Geoffrey Currie, Joanna P Wroblewska, Joanna Kazmierska, Witold Cholewinski, Inga Jagiello, Krzysztof Matuszewski, Andrzej Marszalek, Anna Kubiak, Pawel Golusinski, Wojciech Golusinski, Ewa Majchrzak","doi":"10.1055/a-2365-7808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT and hematological parameters provide supportive data to determine HPV status in HNSCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of clinical and diagnostic data from 106 patients with HNSCC: 26.4% HPV-positive and 73.6% HPV-negative was performed. The following semiquantitative PET/CT parameters for the primary tumor and hottest lymph node and liver were evaluated: SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, TotalSUV, MTV, TLG, maximum, mean and TLG tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR<sub>max</sub>, TLR<sub>mean</sub>,TLR<sub>TLG</sub>) and heterogeneity index (HI). Following hematological variables were assessed: white blood cell (WBC); lymphocyte (LYMPH); neutrophil (NEU),monocyte (MON); platelet (PLT); neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NRL); lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR); platelet-to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR). Conventional statistical analyses were performed in parallel with an artificial neural network analysis (Neural Analyzer, v. 2.9.5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant between-group differences were observed for two of the semiquantitative PET/CT parameters, with higher values in the HPV-negative group: primary tumor MTV (22.2 vs 9.65; p=0.023), and TLR<sub>max</sub> (3.50 vs 2.46; p=0.05). The HPV-negative group also had a significantly higher NEU count (4.84 vs. 6.04; p=0.04), NEU% (58.2 vs. 66.2; p=0.007), and NRL% (2.69 vs. 3.94; p=0.038). Based on ROC analysis (sensitivity 50%, specificity 80%, AUC 0.5), the following variables were independent predictors of HPV-negativity: primary tumor with SUV<sub>max</sub> >10; TotalSUV >2800; MTV >23.5; TLG >180; TLR<sub>max</sub> >3.7; TLR<sub>TLG</sub> >5.7; and oropharyngeal localization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several semiquantitative parameters derived from [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT imaging of the primary tumor (SUV<sub>max</sub>, TotalSUV, MTV, TLG, TLR<sub>max</sub> and TLR<sub>TLG</sub>) were independent predictors of HPV-negativity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2365-7808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether [18F]FDG PET/CT and hematological parameters provide supportive data to determine HPV status in HNSCC patients.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical and diagnostic data from 106 patients with HNSCC: 26.4% HPV-positive and 73.6% HPV-negative was performed. The following semiquantitative PET/CT parameters for the primary tumor and hottest lymph node and liver were evaluated: SUVmax, SUVmean, TotalSUV, MTV, TLG, maximum, mean and TLG tumor-to-liver ratio (TLRmax, TLRmean,TLRTLG) and heterogeneity index (HI). Following hematological variables were assessed: white blood cell (WBC); lymphocyte (LYMPH); neutrophil (NEU),monocyte (MON); platelet (PLT); neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NRL); lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR); platelet-to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR). Conventional statistical analyses were performed in parallel with an artificial neural network analysis (Neural Analyzer, v. 2.9.5).

Results: Significant between-group differences were observed for two of the semiquantitative PET/CT parameters, with higher values in the HPV-negative group: primary tumor MTV (22.2 vs 9.65; p=0.023), and TLRmax (3.50 vs 2.46; p=0.05). The HPV-negative group also had a significantly higher NEU count (4.84 vs. 6.04; p=0.04), NEU% (58.2 vs. 66.2; p=0.007), and NRL% (2.69 vs. 3.94; p=0.038). Based on ROC analysis (sensitivity 50%, specificity 80%, AUC 0.5), the following variables were independent predictors of HPV-negativity: primary tumor with SUVmax >10; TotalSUV >2800; MTV >23.5; TLG >180; TLRmax >3.7; TLRTLG >5.7; and oropharyngeal localization.

Conclusion: Several semiquantitative parameters derived from [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging of the primary tumor (SUVmax, TotalSUV, MTV, TLG, TLRmax and TLRTLG) were independent predictors of HPV-negativity.

[18F]FDG PET/CT显像和血液学参数有助于预测头颈部肿瘤的HPV状态。
目的:确定[18F]FDG PET/CT和血液学参数是否为确定HNSCC患者的HPV状态提供支持性数据。方法:回顾性分析106例HNSCC患者的临床和诊断资料,其中hpv阳性26.4%,hpv阴性73.6%。评估原发肿瘤、最热淋巴结和肝脏的以下半定量PET/CT参数:SUVmax、SUVmean、TotalSUV、MTV、TLG、maximum、mean和TLG瘤肝比(TLRmax、TLRmean、TLRTLG)和异质性指数(HI)。评估以下血液学变量:白细胞(WBC);淋巴细胞(淋巴);中性粒细胞(NEU)、单核细胞(MON);血小板(PLT);中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NRL);淋巴细胞/单核细胞比值;血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)和单核细胞与淋巴细胞比率(MLR)。传统的统计分析与人工神经网络分析(neural Analyzer, v. 2.9.5)并行进行。结果:两项半定量PET/CT参数组间差异显著,hpv阴性组的数值更高:原发肿瘤MTV (22.2 vs 9.65;p=0.023), TLRmax (3.50 vs 2.46;p = 0.05)。hpv阴性组NEU计数也显著高于阴性组(4.84比6.04;p=0.04), NEU% (58.2% vs. 66.2;p=0.007), NRL% (2.69 vs. 3.94;p = 0.038)。根据ROC分析(敏感性50%,特异性80%,AUC 0.5),以下变量是hpv阴性的独立预测因子:原发肿瘤SUVmax为bbb10;TotalSUV > 2800;MTV > 23.5;TLG > 180;TLRmax > 3.7;TLRTLG > 5.7;口咽定位。结论:由[18F]FDG PET/CT原发肿瘤成像得出的几个半定量参数(SUVmax、TotalSUV、MTV、TLG、TLRmax和TLRTLG)是hpv阴性的独立预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信