Prediction Model for Cesarean Scar Disorder Disappearance After Transvaginal Uterine Diverticulum Repair

IF 2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Qing Yang MS , Xiaoli Lv MS , Wenjing Wang MS , Fenghua Chen BD , Liping Yao PhD , Min Ren PhD
{"title":"Prediction Model for Cesarean Scar Disorder Disappearance After Transvaginal Uterine Diverticulum Repair","authors":"Qing Yang MS ,&nbsp;Xiaoli Lv MS ,&nbsp;Wenjing Wang MS ,&nbsp;Fenghua Chen BD ,&nbsp;Liping Yao PhD ,&nbsp;Min Ren PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Cesarean scar disorder (CSD) is a recently defined condition resulting from cesarean delivery (CD) surgery, and transvaginal uterine diverticulum repair (TVUDR) is generally chosen for treatment of CSD. This study constructed a prediction model for CSD disappearance after TVUDR using imaging data for CSD measured by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU), MRI, and contrast-enhanced MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The data of 283 women with previous CD treated with TVUDR were retrospectively collected between January 2014 and February 2016. The imaging data for the CSD parameters were measured, including length, width (W), depth (D), residual myometrium thickness (RMT), RMT/depth (RMT/D)<em>,</em> and RMT/(RMT + depth) [RMT/(RMT+D)].</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the patients included, 129 women presented with disappearance of CSD. We noted potential differences between CSD disappearance and existence after TVUDR for W, RMT, RMT/D, and RMT/(RMT+D) measured by MRI, and D, RMT/D, and RMT/(RMT+D) measured by contrast-enhanced MRI. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, W measured using MRI was found to be associated with the disappearance of CSD (OR 1.134; 95% CI 1.050–1.224, <em>P</em> = 0.001). Subsequently, the W measured by MRI was selected in the prediction model, for which the C-index was 0.624. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the least absolute shrinkage and selection model was 62.40% (95% CI 54.96–69.83%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MRI and contrast-enhanced MRI were found to be relatively accurate methods for detecting CSD. Moreover, W measured using MRI was significantly associated with the disappearance of CSD after TVUDR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","volume":"47 2","pages":"Article 102736"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216324005590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Cesarean scar disorder (CSD) is a recently defined condition resulting from cesarean delivery (CD) surgery, and transvaginal uterine diverticulum repair (TVUDR) is generally chosen for treatment of CSD. This study constructed a prediction model for CSD disappearance after TVUDR using imaging data for CSD measured by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU), MRI, and contrast-enhanced MRI.

Methods

The data of 283 women with previous CD treated with TVUDR were retrospectively collected between January 2014 and February 2016. The imaging data for the CSD parameters were measured, including length, width (W), depth (D), residual myometrium thickness (RMT), RMT/depth (RMT/D), and RMT/(RMT + depth) [RMT/(RMT+D)].

Results

Of the patients included, 129 women presented with disappearance of CSD. We noted potential differences between CSD disappearance and existence after TVUDR for W, RMT, RMT/D, and RMT/(RMT+D) measured by MRI, and D, RMT/D, and RMT/(RMT+D) measured by contrast-enhanced MRI. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, W measured using MRI was found to be associated with the disappearance of CSD (OR 1.134; 95% CI 1.050–1.224, P = 0.001). Subsequently, the W measured by MRI was selected in the prediction model, for which the C-index was 0.624. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the least absolute shrinkage and selection model was 62.40% (95% CI 54.96–69.83%).

Conclusions

MRI and contrast-enhanced MRI were found to be relatively accurate methods for detecting CSD. Moreover, W measured using MRI was significantly associated with the disappearance of CSD after TVUDR.
经阴道子宫憩室修复术后剖宫产瘢痕障碍消失的预测模型。
目的:剖宫产瘢痕障碍(Cesarean scar disorder, CSD)是剖宫产手术引起的一种新疾病,经阴道子宫憩室修复术(TVUDR)是治疗CSD的常用方法。本研究利用经阴道超声(TVU)、磁共振成像(MRI)和磁共振增强成像(MRI)测量的CSD成像数据,构建了TVUDR后CSD消失的预测模型。方法:回顾性收集2014年1月至2016年2月283例经TVUDR治疗的既往CD患者的资料。测量CSD参数的成像数据,包括长度(L)、宽度(W)、深度(D)、残余肌层厚度(RMT)、残余肌层厚度/深度(RMT/D)、残余肌层厚度/(残余肌层厚度+深度)RMT/(RMT+D)。结果:纳入的患者中,129例女性出现CSD消失。我们注意到MRI测量的W、RMT、RMT/D和RMT/(RMT+D)与MRI增强测量的D、RMT/D和RMT/(RMT+D)在TVUDR后CSD消失和存在之间的潜在差异。在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,发现MRI测量的W与CSD的消失有关(优势比,1.134;95% ci, 1.050-1.224;P = 0.001)。随后,在预测模型中选择MRI测得的W,其C指数为0.624。最小绝对收缩和选择模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为62.40% (95% CI, 54.96 ~ 69.83%)。结论:MRI和增强MRI是诊断CSD较为准确的方法。此外,MRI测量的W值与TVUDR后CSD的消失显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
302
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC) is Canada"s peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics, gynaecology, and women"s health. Each monthly issue contains original research articles, reviews, case reports, commentaries, and editorials on all aspects of reproductive health. JOGC is the original publication source of evidence-based clinical guidelines, committee opinions, and policy statements that derive from standing or ad hoc committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. JOGC is included in the National Library of Medicine"s MEDLINE database, and abstracts from JOGC are accessible on PubMed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信