Instruments for evaluating parental support for the practice of physical activity in children and adolescents: A scoping review.

IF 2
Naildo Santos Silva, Paulo Henrique Guerra, Paulo Felipe Ribeiro Bandeira, Júlio Brugnara Mello, Adroaldo Gaya
{"title":"Instruments for evaluating parental support for the practice of physical activity in children and adolescents: A scoping review.","authors":"Naildo Santos Silva, Paulo Henrique Guerra, Paulo Felipe Ribeiro Bandeira, Júlio Brugnara Mello, Adroaldo Gaya","doi":"10.1590/1984-0462/2025/43/2024025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to map the instruments used to assess parental support for physical activity and their constructs and psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>A scoping review was conducted, with searches in seven electronic databases and reference lists, covering articles available until April 2022. Original and cross-sectional studies were sought that used questionnaires, inventories or questions to assess parental support for the practice of physical activity and sports by children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years and that assessed the barriers reported by parents or guardians for not offering support.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Of the initial 1739 articles, 21 made up the synthesis. From a general perspective, 11 studies from 5 continents used a questionnaire or inventory or question to assess parental support; the majority of the samples evaluated were made up of girls and mothers. The intraclass correlation coefficient was the most used measure to evaluate the reliability of the instruments (10 studies). To assess the reliability of the instruments, Cronbach's alpha was the most used measure (13 studies).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only one instrument was constructed respecting the psychometric properties. Authors are advised to consider the importance of following the instrument validity evidence process when developing or adapting instruments.</p>","PeriodicalId":74721,"journal":{"name":"Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo","volume":"43 ","pages":"e2024025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2025/43/2024025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to map the instruments used to assess parental support for physical activity and their constructs and psychometric properties.

Data source: A scoping review was conducted, with searches in seven electronic databases and reference lists, covering articles available until April 2022. Original and cross-sectional studies were sought that used questionnaires, inventories or questions to assess parental support for the practice of physical activity and sports by children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years and that assessed the barriers reported by parents or guardians for not offering support.

Data synthesis: Of the initial 1739 articles, 21 made up the synthesis. From a general perspective, 11 studies from 5 continents used a questionnaire or inventory or question to assess parental support; the majority of the samples evaluated were made up of girls and mothers. The intraclass correlation coefficient was the most used measure to evaluate the reliability of the instruments (10 studies). To assess the reliability of the instruments, Cronbach's alpha was the most used measure (13 studies).

Conclusions: Only one instrument was constructed respecting the psychometric properties. Authors are advised to consider the importance of following the instrument validity evidence process when developing or adapting instruments.

Abstract Image

评估父母对儿童和青少年体育活动实践支持的工具:范围审查。
目的:本研究的目的是绘制用于评估父母对体育活动的支持及其结构和心理测量特性的工具。数据来源:进行了范围审查,检索了七个电子数据库和参考文献列表,涵盖了截至2022年4月的文章。原始和横断面研究采用问卷调查、清单或问题来评估父母对6至17岁儿童和青少年体育活动的支持,并评估父母或监护人报告的不提供支持的障碍。数据综合:在最初的1739篇文章中,有21篇构成了综合。从总体角度来看,来自五大洲的11项研究使用问卷或清单或问题来评估父母的支持;大多数被评估的样本是由女孩和母亲组成的。类内相关系数是评估仪器可靠性的最常用指标(10项研究)。为了评估仪器的可靠性,Cronbach's alpha是最常用的测量方法(13项研究)。结论:仅编制了一套心理测量量表。建议作者在开发或调整仪器时考虑遵循仪器有效性证据过程的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信