Coronary artery injury in pulsed field ablation.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Current Opinion in Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1097/HCO.0000000000001181
Satoshi Higuchi, Edward P Gerstenfeld
{"title":"Coronary artery injury in pulsed field ablation.","authors":"Satoshi Higuchi, Edward P Gerstenfeld","doi":"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Although pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as an innovative nonthermal catheter ablation modality, recent reports raise concerns about its potential impact on nearby coronary arteries. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current understanding and future directions regarding the effects of PFA on or near coronary arteries.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Clinical studies have demonstrated the risks of acute transient vasospasm after delivery of PFA, especially with ablation of structures in proximity to the coronary arteries, such as the cavotricuspid and mitral isthmuses. The clinical incidence has been reported to be approximately 0.14%, according to the largest multicenter registry. Nitroglycerin pretreatment has been demonstrated to mitigate vasospastic events. However, early preclinical models indicate that chronic neointimal hyperplasia, tunica media fibrosis and mild coronary artery narrowing may occur, suggesting long-term coronary injury after delivering PFA near coronary arteries.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Despite reducing collateral tissue damage compared with thermal methods, PFA near coronary arteries may require careful procedural planning and proactive use of nitroglycerin to reduce coronary vasospasm. Further research is essential to elucidate the mechanisms underlying PFA-induced coronary spasm, optimize catheter design and placement, and assess the long-term coronary health implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":55197,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","volume":"40 1","pages":"22-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Although pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as an innovative nonthermal catheter ablation modality, recent reports raise concerns about its potential impact on nearby coronary arteries. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current understanding and future directions regarding the effects of PFA on or near coronary arteries.

Recent findings: Clinical studies have demonstrated the risks of acute transient vasospasm after delivery of PFA, especially with ablation of structures in proximity to the coronary arteries, such as the cavotricuspid and mitral isthmuses. The clinical incidence has been reported to be approximately 0.14%, according to the largest multicenter registry. Nitroglycerin pretreatment has been demonstrated to mitigate vasospastic events. However, early preclinical models indicate that chronic neointimal hyperplasia, tunica media fibrosis and mild coronary artery narrowing may occur, suggesting long-term coronary injury after delivering PFA near coronary arteries.

Summary: Despite reducing collateral tissue damage compared with thermal methods, PFA near coronary arteries may require careful procedural planning and proactive use of nitroglycerin to reduce coronary vasospasm. Further research is essential to elucidate the mechanisms underlying PFA-induced coronary spasm, optimize catheter design and placement, and assess the long-term coronary health implications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Current Opinion in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Cardiology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fourteen disciplines published across the year – including arrhythmias, molecular genetics, HDL cholesterol and clinical trials – every issue also contains annotated reference detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信