Incidence and Risk Factors for Clinically Significant Oropharyngeal Dysphagia After Lung Transplantation.

Transplantation proceedings Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.11.003
Jacques Neelankavil, Reed Harvey, Jure Marijic, Michael Tan, Lorraine Lubin, Ali Salehi, Theodora Wingert, Tristan Grogan, David Sayah, Abbas Ardehali
{"title":"Incidence and Risk Factors for Clinically Significant Oropharyngeal Dysphagia After Lung Transplantation.","authors":"Jacques Neelankavil, Reed Harvey, Jure Marijic, Michael Tan, Lorraine Lubin, Ali Salehi, Theodora Wingert, Tristan Grogan, David Sayah, Abbas Ardehali","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aspiration is one of many risk factors for chronic lung allograft dysfunction, which continues to limit survival in lung transplant recipients. Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) occurring after lung transplant surgery increases the risk of antegrade aspiration. While the incidence and risk factors for OPD have been well described in cardiac surgery, there is less known in the lung transplant population. The aim of this retrospective, single-center study was to determine the incidence of clinically significant OPD in lung transplant recipients and to identify patient and procedural risk factors for OPD in this population. A total of 158 lung transplant recipients who underwent postoperative fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) were included in the study. The incidence of OPD was 67.1% (106/158) with 29.8% (47) having a complete absence of swallowing function. Female sex, cardiopulmonary bypass, duration of intubation, and an increased number of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) clips were associated with OPD. The incidence of OPD in this study is consistent with the limited data available in lung transplant literature, and higher than that of general cardiac surgery. An increased number of acquired TEE clips is a novel OPD risk factor in this population and a modifiable target for future intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":"2226-2230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.11.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aspiration is one of many risk factors for chronic lung allograft dysfunction, which continues to limit survival in lung transplant recipients. Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) occurring after lung transplant surgery increases the risk of antegrade aspiration. While the incidence and risk factors for OPD have been well described in cardiac surgery, there is less known in the lung transplant population. The aim of this retrospective, single-center study was to determine the incidence of clinically significant OPD in lung transplant recipients and to identify patient and procedural risk factors for OPD in this population. A total of 158 lung transplant recipients who underwent postoperative fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) were included in the study. The incidence of OPD was 67.1% (106/158) with 29.8% (47) having a complete absence of swallowing function. Female sex, cardiopulmonary bypass, duration of intubation, and an increased number of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) clips were associated with OPD. The incidence of OPD in this study is consistent with the limited data available in lung transplant literature, and higher than that of general cardiac surgery. An increased number of acquired TEE clips is a novel OPD risk factor in this population and a modifiable target for future intervention.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信