Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Angiography-Derived Non-Hyperemic Pressure Ratio Using Pressure Wire as Reference.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hiroyuki Omori, Yoshiaki Kawase, Takuya Mizukami, Toru Tanigaki, Tetsuo Hirata, Munenori Okubo, Hiroki Kamiya, Masanori Kawasaki, Takeshi Kondo, Takahiko Suzuki, Hitoshi Matsuo
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Angiography-Derived Non-Hyperemic Pressure Ratio Using Pressure Wire as Reference.","authors":"Hiroyuki Omori, Yoshiaki Kawase, Takuya Mizukami, Toru Tanigaki, Tetsuo Hirata, Munenori Okubo, Hiroki Kamiya, Masanori Kawasaki, Takeshi Kondo, Takahiko Suzuki, Hitoshi Matsuo","doi":"10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The angiography-derived non-hyperemic pressure ratio (angioNHPR) is a novel index of NHPR based on artificial intelligence (AI) that does not require pressure wires. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of angioNHPR for detecting hemodynamically relevant coronary artery disease.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study, angioNHPR was assessed using the invasive NHPR as the reference standard. An angioNHPR ≤0.89 was defined as indicative of physiologically significant stenosis. Two angiographic projections ≥30° difference in angulation were selected. The lumen and centerline were automatically segmented by the prototype software, allowing for the calculation of the angioNHPR. We assessed 222 vessels from 178 patients. The accuracy of angioNHPR was 76.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70.4-82.0), with sensitivity 66.2% (95% CI 54.0-77.0), specificity 81.5% (95% CI 74.3-87.3), positive predictive value 62.7% (95% CI 53.6-70.9), and negative predictive value 83.7% (95% CI 78.6-87.7). The angioNHPR showed good correlation with invasive NHPR (r=0.72; 95% CI 0.64-0.77; P<0.001), and the agreement between angioNHPR and invasive NHPR was -0.01 (limits of agreement: -0.13, 0.11). The area under the curve (AUC) of angioNHPR was 0.81 (95% CI 0.75-0.86), which was significantly higher than that of 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (AUC 0.69; 95% CI 0.62-0.75; P=0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI-based angioNHPR demonstrates good diagnostic performance using invasive NHPR as the reference standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":50691,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0593","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The angiography-derived non-hyperemic pressure ratio (angioNHPR) is a novel index of NHPR based on artificial intelligence (AI) that does not require pressure wires. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of angioNHPR for detecting hemodynamically relevant coronary artery disease.

Methods and results: In this retrospective single-center study, angioNHPR was assessed using the invasive NHPR as the reference standard. An angioNHPR ≤0.89 was defined as indicative of physiologically significant stenosis. Two angiographic projections ≥30° difference in angulation were selected. The lumen and centerline were automatically segmented by the prototype software, allowing for the calculation of the angioNHPR. We assessed 222 vessels from 178 patients. The accuracy of angioNHPR was 76.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70.4-82.0), with sensitivity 66.2% (95% CI 54.0-77.0), specificity 81.5% (95% CI 74.3-87.3), positive predictive value 62.7% (95% CI 53.6-70.9), and negative predictive value 83.7% (95% CI 78.6-87.7). The angioNHPR showed good correlation with invasive NHPR (r=0.72; 95% CI 0.64-0.77; P<0.001), and the agreement between angioNHPR and invasive NHPR was -0.01 (limits of agreement: -0.13, 0.11). The area under the curve (AUC) of angioNHPR was 0.81 (95% CI 0.75-0.86), which was significantly higher than that of 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (AUC 0.69; 95% CI 0.62-0.75; P=0.007).

Conclusions: AI-based angioNHPR demonstrates good diagnostic performance using invasive NHPR as the reference standard.

以压力丝为参考的人工智能血管造影非充血压比诊断性能
背景:血管造影衍生的非充血压比(angioNHPR)是一种基于人工智能(AI)的新型NHPR指标,不需要压力线。我们研究了血管hpr检测血流动力学相关冠状动脉疾病的诊断准确性。方法与结果:在本回顾性单中心研究中,血管hpr以有创NHPR为参考标准进行评估。血管hpr≤0.89被定义为生理上明显的狭窄。选择两个角度差≥30°的血管造影投影。通过原型软件自动分割管腔和中心线,计算血管hpr。我们评估了来自178名患者的222条血管。angioNHPR准确率为76.6%(95%可信区间[CI] 70.4 ~ 82.0),敏感性66.2% (95% CI 54.0 ~ 77.0),特异性81.5% (95% CI 74.3 ~ 87.3),阳性预测值62.7% (95% CI 53.6 ~ 70.9),阴性预测值83.7% (95% CI 78.6 ~ 87.7)。血管hpr与有创NHPR相关性良好(r=0.72;95% ci 0.64-0.77;结论:以有创NHPR为参考标准,人工智能血管hpr具有较好的诊断效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation Journal
Circulation Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
471
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信