Levator Veli Palatini Muscle Ratio Is a Clinically Significant Anatomic Predictor for Velopharyngeal Surgical Need.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1177/10556656241298833
Kazlin N Mason, Thomas Gampper, Jonathan Black
{"title":"Levator Veli Palatini Muscle Ratio Is a Clinically Significant Anatomic Predictor for Velopharyngeal Surgical Need.","authors":"Kazlin N Mason, Thomas Gampper, Jonathan Black","doi":"10.1177/10556656241298833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveVelopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) poses challenges for normal speech production, often necessitating surgical intervention. Determining optimal candidates for surgery remains complex and requires a nuanced understanding of underlying anatomic factors contributing to VPI. This study aimed to identify anatomic predictors that drive surgical recommendations for VPI.DesignProspective observational cohort study.SettingPediatric tertiary care hospital.MethodsMagnetic resonance imaging data were acquired from 150 children (aged 4-17) to identify anatomic predictors of VPI and surgical need. Fourteen velopharyngeal variables were measured in the oblique coronal and midsagittal imaging planes. Calculations included differences in levator veli palatini (LVP) muscle angles of origin, mean extravelar length, differences between left and right extravelar segments, the VP Needs ratio, and a newly developed LVP ratio. Multivariate logistic regression models with k-fold cross validation were utilized to identify anatomic profiles predictive of VPI and receiving a surgical recommendation.ResultsThe models demonstrated high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Among anatomic variables, the LVP ratio emerged as the strongest determinant of surgical need (β = 11.256, <i>p </i>< .001). Notably, an increase in the LVP ratio of 0.10 is associated with a 3.08-fold increase in the likelihood of receiving a surgical recommendation. LVP ratios above 1.0 were significant for both VPI classification and surgical need.ConclusionsThe LVP ratio significantly differentiates individuals with VPI and is predictive of surgical need for VPI management. Inclusion of the LVP ratio into clinical evaluations may refine patient stratification, enabling more precise surgical decision-making tailored to individual anatomic variations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"250-262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241298833","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveVelopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) poses challenges for normal speech production, often necessitating surgical intervention. Determining optimal candidates for surgery remains complex and requires a nuanced understanding of underlying anatomic factors contributing to VPI. This study aimed to identify anatomic predictors that drive surgical recommendations for VPI.DesignProspective observational cohort study.SettingPediatric tertiary care hospital.MethodsMagnetic resonance imaging data were acquired from 150 children (aged 4-17) to identify anatomic predictors of VPI and surgical need. Fourteen velopharyngeal variables were measured in the oblique coronal and midsagittal imaging planes. Calculations included differences in levator veli palatini (LVP) muscle angles of origin, mean extravelar length, differences between left and right extravelar segments, the VP Needs ratio, and a newly developed LVP ratio. Multivariate logistic regression models with k-fold cross validation were utilized to identify anatomic profiles predictive of VPI and receiving a surgical recommendation.ResultsThe models demonstrated high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Among anatomic variables, the LVP ratio emerged as the strongest determinant of surgical need (β = 11.256, p < .001). Notably, an increase in the LVP ratio of 0.10 is associated with a 3.08-fold increase in the likelihood of receiving a surgical recommendation. LVP ratios above 1.0 were significant for both VPI classification and surgical need.ConclusionsThe LVP ratio significantly differentiates individuals with VPI and is predictive of surgical need for VPI management. Inclusion of the LVP ratio into clinical evaluations may refine patient stratification, enabling more precise surgical decision-making tailored to individual anatomic variations.

提上腭肌比率是腭咽手术需要的临床重要解剖预测指标。
目的:腭咽功能不全(VPI)对正常的语言产生造成了挑战,经常需要手术干预。确定最佳手术候选人仍然很复杂,需要对导致VPI的潜在解剖因素有细致入微的了解。本研究旨在确定驱动VPI手术建议的解剖学预测因素。设计:前瞻性观察队列研究。单位:儿科三级保健医院。方法:收集150名4-17岁儿童的磁共振成像数据,以确定VPI的解剖预测因素和手术需求。在斜冠状面和中矢状面成像平面上测量了14个腭咽变量。计算包括提肛腭提肌(LVP)肌肉原点角的差异、平均行外长度、左右行外节段的差异、VP需求比和新开发的LVP比。采用k-fold交叉验证的多变量逻辑回归模型来确定预测VPI的解剖特征并接受手术建议。结果:该模型具有较高的准确性、敏感性和特异性。在解剖学变量中,LVP比是手术需求的最强决定因素(β = 11.256, p)。结论:LVP比可显著区分VPI患者,并预测VPI治疗的手术需求。将LVP比值纳入临床评估可以细化患者分层,使手术决策更精确,以适应个体解剖差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信