Identifying Responsible Factors for Poor Surgical Visibility in Pediatric Laparoscopic Fundoplication: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Yohei Sanmoto, Yudai Goto, Kouji Masumoto
{"title":"Identifying Responsible Factors for Poor Surgical Visibility in Pediatric Laparoscopic Fundoplication: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.","authors":"Yohei Sanmoto, Yudai Goto, Kouji Masumoto","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Laparoscopic fundoplication is commonly performed in patients with neurological impairment. However, these patients often have spinal deformities that can complicate achieving a clear surgical view. This study aimed to identify factors associated with poor visibility in pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Operative videos, medical records, and radiographs of patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication between 2015 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The videos were reviewed by two pediatric surgeons and classified into good or poor visibility groups. Age, sex, height, weight, history of abdominal surgery, lordosis, operative time, blood loss, and intraoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Lordosis was evaluated using the sagittal view of computed tomography images, and the anterior vertebral depth and abdominal thickness were measured to calculate the ratio. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Forty-one patients were included in this study. Based on the video review, the patients were classified into good (20 patients) and poor (21 patients) visibility groups. The median age, height, and weight were 6 years, 110 cm, and 16.1 kg, respectively. In the poor visibility group, 23.8% of patients had a history of abdominal surgery (<i>P</i> = .048). Additionally, the anterior vertebral depth to abdominal thickness ratios at the first and third lumbar vertebrae were significantly lower in the poor visibility group (<i>P</i> = .016 and <i>P</i> = .0018, respectively). There were no significant differences in the operative time, blood loss, or intraoperative complications between the two groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Lordosis and a history of abdominal surgery may be risk factors for poor visibility in pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"178-183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic fundoplication is commonly performed in patients with neurological impairment. However, these patients often have spinal deformities that can complicate achieving a clear surgical view. This study aimed to identify factors associated with poor visibility in pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication. Methods: Operative videos, medical records, and radiographs of patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication between 2015 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The videos were reviewed by two pediatric surgeons and classified into good or poor visibility groups. Age, sex, height, weight, history of abdominal surgery, lordosis, operative time, blood loss, and intraoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Lordosis was evaluated using the sagittal view of computed tomography images, and the anterior vertebral depth and abdominal thickness were measured to calculate the ratio. Results: Forty-one patients were included in this study. Based on the video review, the patients were classified into good (20 patients) and poor (21 patients) visibility groups. The median age, height, and weight were 6 years, 110 cm, and 16.1 kg, respectively. In the poor visibility group, 23.8% of patients had a history of abdominal surgery (P = .048). Additionally, the anterior vertebral depth to abdominal thickness ratios at the first and third lumbar vertebrae were significantly lower in the poor visibility group (P = .016 and P = .0018, respectively). There were no significant differences in the operative time, blood loss, or intraoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusions: Lordosis and a history of abdominal surgery may be risk factors for poor visibility in pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication.

确定儿童腹腔镜下手术可视性差的主要因素:一项回顾性单中心研究。
背景:腹腔镜下颅底复制术常用于神经功能障碍患者。然而,这些患者通常有脊柱畸形,这使得获得清晰的手术视野变得复杂。本研究的目的是确定儿童腹腔镜手术中能见度低的相关因素。方法:回顾性分析2015 - 2023年腹腔镜下盆底复制术患者的手术录像、病历和x线片。这些视频由两名儿科外科医生审阅,并分为能见度好和能见度差两组。比较两组患者的年龄、性别、身高、体重、腹部手术史、前凸、手术时间、出血量及术中并发症。使用计算机断层图像矢状面评估前凸,并测量前椎体深度和腹部厚度以计算比值。结果:41例患者纳入本研究。根据视频回顾,将患者分为可视性好组(20例)和可视性差组(21例)。年龄、身高和体重的中位值分别为6岁、110 cm和16.1 kg。能见度低组23.8%的患者有腹部手术史(P = 0.048)。此外,可视性差组第一和第三腰椎前椎体深度与腹部厚度之比显著低于对照组(P = 0.016和P = 0.0018)。两组手术时间、出血量、术中并发症无显著差异。结论:前凸和腹部手术史可能是儿童腹腔镜下翻底术可视性差的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信