Veena S Singaram, Rayishnee Pillay, Esther L Mbobnda Kapche
{"title":"Exploring the role of digital technology for feedback exchange in clinical training: a scoping review.","authors":"Veena S Singaram, Rayishnee Pillay, Esther L Mbobnda Kapche","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02705-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Feedback plays an integral role in clinical training and can profoundly impact students' motivation and academic progression. The shift to online teaching, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighted the necessity of transitioning traditional feedback mechanisms to digital platforms. Despite this, there is still a lack of clarity regarding effective strategies and tools for delivering digital feedback in clinical education. This scoping review aimed to assess the current utilization of digital feedback methods in clinical education, with a focus on identifying potential directions for future research and innovation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A database search using a published protocol based on the Joanna Briggs Institute framework was conducted between January 2010 and December 2023. Six databases were searched, PubMed/MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, Scopus, Google Scholar, Union Catalogue of Theses and Dissertations, and WorldCat Dissertations and Theses. Reviewers independently screened the papers against eligibility criteria and discussed the papers to attain consensus. Extracted data were analyzed qualitatively and descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2412 records identified, 33 reports met the inclusion criteria. Digital tools explored for feedback included web-based and social sites, smart device applications, virtual learning environments, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence. Convenience and immediate, personalized feedback and enhanced formative assessment outcomes were major facilitators of digital feedback utility. Technical constraints, limited content development, training, and data security issues hindered the adoption of these tools. Reports mostly comprised empirical research, published in the global North and conducted on undergraduates studying medicine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlighted a geographical imbalance in research on feedback exchange via digital tools for clinical training and stressed the need for increased studies in the global South. Furthermore, there is a call for broader exploration across other health professions and postgraduate education. Additionally, student perceptions of digital tools as intrusive necessitate a balanced integration with traditional feedback dialogues. The incorporation of virtual reality and artificial intelligence presents promising opportunities for personalized, real-time feedback, but requires vigilant governance to ensure data integrity and privacy. SCOPING REVIEW PROTOCOL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02151-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"298"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02705-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Feedback plays an integral role in clinical training and can profoundly impact students' motivation and academic progression. The shift to online teaching, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighted the necessity of transitioning traditional feedback mechanisms to digital platforms. Despite this, there is still a lack of clarity regarding effective strategies and tools for delivering digital feedback in clinical education. This scoping review aimed to assess the current utilization of digital feedback methods in clinical education, with a focus on identifying potential directions for future research and innovation.
Methods: A database search using a published protocol based on the Joanna Briggs Institute framework was conducted between January 2010 and December 2023. Six databases were searched, PubMed/MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, Scopus, Google Scholar, Union Catalogue of Theses and Dissertations, and WorldCat Dissertations and Theses. Reviewers independently screened the papers against eligibility criteria and discussed the papers to attain consensus. Extracted data were analyzed qualitatively and descriptively.
Results: Of the 2412 records identified, 33 reports met the inclusion criteria. Digital tools explored for feedback included web-based and social sites, smart device applications, virtual learning environments, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence. Convenience and immediate, personalized feedback and enhanced formative assessment outcomes were major facilitators of digital feedback utility. Technical constraints, limited content development, training, and data security issues hindered the adoption of these tools. Reports mostly comprised empirical research, published in the global North and conducted on undergraduates studying medicine.
Conclusion: This review highlighted a geographical imbalance in research on feedback exchange via digital tools for clinical training and stressed the need for increased studies in the global South. Furthermore, there is a call for broader exploration across other health professions and postgraduate education. Additionally, student perceptions of digital tools as intrusive necessitate a balanced integration with traditional feedback dialogues. The incorporation of virtual reality and artificial intelligence presents promising opportunities for personalized, real-time feedback, but requires vigilant governance to ensure data integrity and privacy. SCOPING REVIEW PROTOCOL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02151-8.
背景:反馈在临床训练中起着不可或缺的作用,并能深刻地影响学生的学习动机和学业进步。COVID-19大流行加速了向在线教学的转变,凸显了将传统反馈机制转变为数字平台的必要性。尽管如此,在临床教育中提供数字反馈的有效策略和工具仍然缺乏清晰度。本综述旨在评估目前数字反馈方法在临床教育中的应用,重点是确定未来研究和创新的潜在方向。方法:在2010年1月至2023年12月期间,使用基于Joanna Briggs研究所框架的已发布协议进行数据库检索。检索PubMed/MEDLINE、EBSCOhost、Scopus、b谷歌Scholar、Union Catalogue of thesis and dissertation和WorldCat dissertation and dissertation 6个数据库。审稿人根据资格标准独立筛选论文,并对论文进行讨论以达成共识。提取的数据进行定性和描述性分析。结果:在确定的2412份记录中,33份报告符合纳入标准。研究反馈的数字工具包括网络和社交网站、智能设备应用程序、虚拟学习环境、虚拟现实和人工智能。方便、即时、个性化的反馈和增强的形成性评估结果是数字反馈效用的主要促进因素。技术限制、有限的内容开发、培训和数据安全问题阻碍了这些工具的采用。报告主要由实证研究组成,发表在全球北方,对医学本科生进行研究。结论:这篇综述强调了通过临床培训的数字工具进行反馈交换的研究在地域上的不平衡,并强调了在全球南方增加研究的必要性。此外,还呼吁在其他卫生专业和研究生教育领域进行更广泛的探索。此外,学生认为数字工具具有侵入性,因此需要与传统反馈对话进行平衡整合。虚拟现实和人工智能的结合为个性化、实时反馈提供了有希望的机会,但需要警惕的治理来确保数据的完整性和隐私。范围审查协议:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02151-8。
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.