Impact of prior dengue infection on severity and outcomes: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alejandro Macchia, Silvana Figar, Cristián Biscayart, Fernán González Bernaldo de Quirós
{"title":"Impact of prior dengue infection on severity and outcomes: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials.","authors":"Alejandro Macchia, Silvana Figar, Cristián Biscayart, Fernán González Bernaldo de Quirós","doi":"10.26633/RPSP.2024.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the association between serologically confirmed prior dengue infection and the subsequent risk of virologically confirmed dengue, severe dengue, dengue hospitalization, dengue-related death and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for reports of phase III randomized controlled trials of vaccine efficacy that had data about the placebo group and information about prior infections and were published between January 1994 and March 2024. Random-effects models were used to calculate combined odds ratios (ORs), and heterogeneity was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies from three phase III trials were included. Participants with prior infection had a lower likelihood of developing virologically confirmed dengue during follow up (OR: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75 to 0.98, <i>P</i> = 0.024) and the same risk of dengue hospitalization as those without prior infection (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.53, <i>P</i> = 0.198). However, they had a higher rate of severe dengue (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.23 to 6.87, <i>P</i> = 0.015). No dengue-related deaths occurred during follow up. There were no statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality between individuals with and without prior dengue (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 0.21 to 14.08, <i>P</i> = 0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prior dengue infection significantly reduced the risk of virologically confirmed dengue and increased the risk of severe dengue, but had no significant effect on dengue hospitalization, dengue-related death or all-cause mortality during follow up. These findings suggest the need to reconsider prior infection as an independent risk factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":21264,"journal":{"name":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 ","pages":"e129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2024.129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the association between serologically confirmed prior dengue infection and the subsequent risk of virologically confirmed dengue, severe dengue, dengue hospitalization, dengue-related death and all-cause mortality.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for reports of phase III randomized controlled trials of vaccine efficacy that had data about the placebo group and information about prior infections and were published between January 1994 and March 2024. Random-effects models were used to calculate combined odds ratios (ORs), and heterogeneity was assessed.

Results: Four studies from three phase III trials were included. Participants with prior infection had a lower likelihood of developing virologically confirmed dengue during follow up (OR: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75 to 0.98, P = 0.024) and the same risk of dengue hospitalization as those without prior infection (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.53, P = 0.198). However, they had a higher rate of severe dengue (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.23 to 6.87, P = 0.015). No dengue-related deaths occurred during follow up. There were no statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality between individuals with and without prior dengue (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 0.21 to 14.08, P = 0.76).

Conclusions: Prior dengue infection significantly reduced the risk of virologically confirmed dengue and increased the risk of severe dengue, but had no significant effect on dengue hospitalization, dengue-related death or all-cause mortality during follow up. These findings suggest the need to reconsider prior infection as an independent risk factor.

先前登革热感染对严重程度和结局的影响:安慰剂对照试验的荟萃分析。
目的:本研究评估血清学证实的既往登革热感染与随后病毒学证实的登革热、重症登革热、登革热住院治疗、登革热相关死亡和全因死亡率之间的关系。方法:根据PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science检索了1994年1月至2024年3月间发表的具有安慰剂组数据和既往感染信息的疫苗有效性的III期随机对照试验报告。随机效应模型用于计算联合优势比(ORs),并评估异质性。结果:纳入了来自3个III期试验的4项研究。既往感染的参与者在随访期间发生病毒学确诊登革热的可能性较低(OR: 0.85, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.75至0.98,P = 0.024),且与未既往感染的参与者发生登革热住院的风险相同(OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.92至1.53,P = 0.198)。然而,他们有更高的严重登革热发病率(OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.23 ~ 6.87, P = 0.015)。随访期间未发生与登革热有关的死亡。有和没有登革热病史的个体的全因死亡率无统计学差异(OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 0.21 ~ 14.08, P = 0.76)。结论:既往登革热感染可显著降低病毒学确诊登革热的风险,增加重症登革热的风险,但对随访期间登革热住院、登革热相关死亡或全因死亡率无显著影响。这些发现提示需要重新考虑既往感染作为一个独立的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信