Diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction for detection of mpox in humans.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Greeshma Unnikrishnan, Abhinav Singh, Abhishek Purohit
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction for detection of mpox in humans.","authors":"Greeshma Unnikrishnan, Abhinav Singh, Abhishek Purohit","doi":"10.26633/RPSP.2024.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in detecting mpox infection in humans by pooling the estimates of sensitivity and specificity across different study settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane database, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of PCR test for the detection of monkeypox virus providing the sensitivity and specificity values and the total number of samples were included. The sensitivity and specificity values of PCR test were pooled for all the included studies. The meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using the metadta package in STATA software. A summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and forest plot were generated. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD-NIHR) database with Reference ID CRD42024590183.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies were included for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity estimate across all the studies using a random effects model was 0.99 (95% CI [0.95, 1.00]) and 1 (95% CI [0.96, 1.00]), respectively. The SROC curve confirmed high diagnostic accuracy of PCR. The quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) tool depicted low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first study in the scientific literature to provide a pooling for diagnostic accuracy for PCR test for mpox and confirms it as an accurate tool in detecting the infection in humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":21264,"journal":{"name":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 ","pages":"e131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2024.131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in detecting mpox infection in humans by pooling the estimates of sensitivity and specificity across different study settings.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane database, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of PCR test for the detection of monkeypox virus providing the sensitivity and specificity values and the total number of samples were included. The sensitivity and specificity values of PCR test were pooled for all the included studies. The meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using the metadta package in STATA software. A summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and forest plot were generated. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD-NIHR) database with Reference ID CRD42024590183.

Results: Twelve studies were included for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity estimate across all the studies using a random effects model was 0.99 (95% CI [0.95, 1.00]) and 1 (95% CI [0.96, 1.00]), respectively. The SROC curve confirmed high diagnostic accuracy of PCR. The quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) tool depicted low risk of bias.

Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first study in the scientific literature to provide a pooling for diagnostic accuracy for PCR test for mpox and confirms it as an accurate tool in detecting the infection in humans.

聚合酶链反应检测人痘的诊断准确性。
目的:通过汇总不同研究设置的敏感性和特异性估计,评估聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测人痘感染的诊断准确性。方法:系统检索PubMed、Cochrane数据库、Scopus和谷歌Scholar。包括评估PCR检测猴痘病毒诊断准确性的研究,提供敏感性和特异性值以及样本总数。汇总所有纳入研究的PCR检测的敏感性和特异性值。meta分析按照PRISMA指南进行,使用STATA软件中的元软件包。生成接收者工作特征曲线(SROC)和森林图。该协议已在PROSPERO (CRD-NIHR)数据库中注册,参考ID为CRD42024590183。结果:12项研究被纳入meta分析。使用随机效应模型的所有研究的合并敏感性和特异性估计分别为0.99 (95% CI[0.95, 1.00])和1 (95% CI[0.96, 1.00])。SROC曲线证实PCR具有较高的诊断准确性。诊断准确性研究的质量评估(QUADAS)工具描述了低偏倚风险。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析是科学文献中首次为m痘PCR检测的诊断准确性提供汇总,并证实其是检测人类感染的准确工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信