Effect of ceramic dressings and silver-impregnated dressings on bacterial load and wound closure: a comparative study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Febe A Bruwer, Rene Lessing
{"title":"Effect of ceramic dressings and silver-impregnated dressings on bacterial load and wound closure: a comparative study.","authors":"Febe A Bruwer, Rene Lessing","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2024.0334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wound healing is a series of complex and dynamic processes which occur in several stages. Optimal wound healing is essential for restoring the integrity and function of the affected area. Although medicated wound dressings have been extensively employed to control wound infection, the risks associated with antimicrobials make the use of non-medicated alternatives necessary. Nevertheless, the relationship between the concentrations of medicated wound dressings and their antimicrobial activities, along with their wound healing efficacies, still remains unclear. Non-medicated wound dressings are an alternative to dressings that contain active ingredients acting as antimicrobials or antiseptics. In the present study, the researchers examined the reduction of bacterial load as the primary endpoint and the healing rate as the secondary endpoint, comparing microporous ceramic dressings to silver-impregnated dressings in participants from two outpatient wound management clinics. The study included 25 participants in the silver-impregnated dressing (control) group and 28 participants in the ceramic dressing (study) group. The participants' wounds were assessed through MolecuLight i:X (MolecuLight Inc., Canada) wound tracing and MolecuLight i:X fluorescence imaging to measure the wound size, as well as presence of a bacterial load of >10<sup>4</sup> colony forming units/g at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4. The results indicated that there was a significant difference in the distribution over the categories of bacterial load cleared after weeks 1, 2, 3 or 4 in the two groups. Moreover, the bacterial load cleared significantly faster in the study group (p=0.001). Mean wound size was 10.93cm<sup>2</sup> (range: 0.10-37.95cm<sup>2</sup>) in the control group and 11.48cm<sup>2</sup> (range: 0.80-60cm<sup>2</sup>) in the study group. In the maximum likelihood regression analysis, the mean reduction in wound area for the study group was greater than that for the control group. The study concluded that the ceramic dressings could be an effective alternative to silver-impregnated dressings when treating infected wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"33 12","pages":"898-904"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wound healing is a series of complex and dynamic processes which occur in several stages. Optimal wound healing is essential for restoring the integrity and function of the affected area. Although medicated wound dressings have been extensively employed to control wound infection, the risks associated with antimicrobials make the use of non-medicated alternatives necessary. Nevertheless, the relationship between the concentrations of medicated wound dressings and their antimicrobial activities, along with their wound healing efficacies, still remains unclear. Non-medicated wound dressings are an alternative to dressings that contain active ingredients acting as antimicrobials or antiseptics. In the present study, the researchers examined the reduction of bacterial load as the primary endpoint and the healing rate as the secondary endpoint, comparing microporous ceramic dressings to silver-impregnated dressings in participants from two outpatient wound management clinics. The study included 25 participants in the silver-impregnated dressing (control) group and 28 participants in the ceramic dressing (study) group. The participants' wounds were assessed through MolecuLight i:X (MolecuLight Inc., Canada) wound tracing and MolecuLight i:X fluorescence imaging to measure the wound size, as well as presence of a bacterial load of >104 colony forming units/g at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4. The results indicated that there was a significant difference in the distribution over the categories of bacterial load cleared after weeks 1, 2, 3 or 4 in the two groups. Moreover, the bacterial load cleared significantly faster in the study group (p=0.001). Mean wound size was 10.93cm2 (range: 0.10-37.95cm2) in the control group and 11.48cm2 (range: 0.80-60cm2) in the study group. In the maximum likelihood regression analysis, the mean reduction in wound area for the study group was greater than that for the control group. The study concluded that the ceramic dressings could be an effective alternative to silver-impregnated dressings when treating infected wounds.

陶瓷敷料和浸银敷料对细菌负荷和伤口愈合影响的比较研究。
创面愈合是一个复杂的动态过程,分几个阶段进行。最佳的伤口愈合对于恢复受影响区域的完整性和功能至关重要。虽然药物伤口敷料已被广泛用于控制伤口感染,但与抗菌素相关的风险使得使用非药物替代品成为必要。然而,伤口敷料的浓度与其抗菌活性以及伤口愈合效果之间的关系仍不清楚。非药物伤口敷料是一种替代敷料,含有活性成分,作为抗菌剂或防腐剂。在目前的研究中,研究人员检查了细菌负荷的减少作为主要终点,治愈率作为次要终点,比较了来自两个门诊伤口管理诊所的参与者的微孔陶瓷敷料和浸银敷料。该研究包括25名银浸渍敷料组(对照组)和28名陶瓷敷料组(研究组)。通过分子光i:X(加拿大分子光公司)伤口追踪和分子光i:X荧光成像来评估参与者的伤口,以测量伤口大小,以及在第1、2、3和4周细菌负荷为bbb104菌落形成单位/g的存在。结果表明,两组在1、2、3、4周后清除的细菌负荷类别分布有显著差异。此外,研究组的细菌负荷清除速度明显更快(p=0.001)。对照组平均创面面积10.93cm2(范围:0.10 ~ 37.95cm2),研究组平均创面面积11.48cm2(范围:0.80 ~ 60cm2)。在最大似然回归分析中,研究组创面面积的平均减少量大于对照组。研究结果表明,在治疗感染伤口时,陶瓷敷料可能是一种有效的替代银浸渍敷料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信