Occlusal device therapy for sleep bruxism: Analysis of educational value, clarity, reliability, understandability, and actionability of information of content on YouTube.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Tay Xiao Thong, Jennese Moo Wann Wai, Smita Nimbalkar, Pravinkumar G Patil
{"title":"Occlusal device therapy for sleep bruxism: Analysis of educational value, clarity, reliability, understandability, and actionability of information of content on YouTube.","authors":"Tay Xiao Thong, Jennese Moo Wann Wai, Smita Nimbalkar, Pravinkumar G Patil","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Sleep bruxism, characterized by teeth grinding during sleep, is often managed with an occlusal device. Despite the abundance of YouTube videos discussing occlusal device therapy, their educational quality remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this process-based audit was to assess the educational value (EV), clarity (COI), reliability (ROI), understandability (UOI), and actionability (AOI) of information regarding occlusal device therapy for sleep bruxism in YouTube videos provided by dental professionals.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>YouTube was searched systematically using 4 search terms. A total of 19 videos were identified using predetermined criteria. EV was assessed using a 4-point scoring system across 10 predetermined domains. A 3-point scoring system was applied to evaluate COI. Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria was applied to evaluate ROI. Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for audio-visual material (PEMAT-A/V) was used to determine UOI and AOI. Descriptive statistics, interrater and intrarater reliability tests were conducted using a statistical software program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most videos had been uploaded by general dental practitioners (95%) followed by orthodontists (5%). The mean number of reported domains was 4.68 ±2.73 (out of 10), with the highest scoring domain being \"Indications of occlusal device\" (1.24 ±0.87), and the lowest being \"Cost of occlusal device\" (0.00 ±0.00). Overall, the EV score per video was 5.61 ±5.10 (out of 30), while the COI score was 0.55 ±0.50 (out of 2). The ROI averaged 1.95 ±0.40 (out of 4), with \"Attribution\" scoring lowest (0.026 ±0.11) and \"Currency\" highest (1). Overall, the videos had a mean understandability of 66.6% and actionability of 45.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Videos uploaded by dental professionals lack sufficient educational value pertaining to the cost of occlusal devices. The videos demonstrated low reliability regarding the credibility of sources and poor understandability and actionability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: Sleep bruxism, characterized by teeth grinding during sleep, is often managed with an occlusal device. Despite the abundance of YouTube videos discussing occlusal device therapy, their educational quality remains unclear.

Purpose: The purpose of this process-based audit was to assess the educational value (EV), clarity (COI), reliability (ROI), understandability (UOI), and actionability (AOI) of information regarding occlusal device therapy for sleep bruxism in YouTube videos provided by dental professionals.

Material and methods: YouTube was searched systematically using 4 search terms. A total of 19 videos were identified using predetermined criteria. EV was assessed using a 4-point scoring system across 10 predetermined domains. A 3-point scoring system was applied to evaluate COI. Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria was applied to evaluate ROI. Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for audio-visual material (PEMAT-A/V) was used to determine UOI and AOI. Descriptive statistics, interrater and intrarater reliability tests were conducted using a statistical software program.

Results: Most videos had been uploaded by general dental practitioners (95%) followed by orthodontists (5%). The mean number of reported domains was 4.68 ±2.73 (out of 10), with the highest scoring domain being "Indications of occlusal device" (1.24 ±0.87), and the lowest being "Cost of occlusal device" (0.00 ±0.00). Overall, the EV score per video was 5.61 ±5.10 (out of 30), while the COI score was 0.55 ±0.50 (out of 2). The ROI averaged 1.95 ±0.40 (out of 4), with "Attribution" scoring lowest (0.026 ±0.11) and "Currency" highest (1). Overall, the videos had a mean understandability of 66.6% and actionability of 45.6%.

Conclusions: Videos uploaded by dental professionals lack sufficient educational value pertaining to the cost of occlusal devices. The videos demonstrated low reliability regarding the credibility of sources and poor understandability and actionability.

咬合装置治疗睡眠磨牙症:YouTube内容信息的教育价值、清晰度、可靠性、可理解性和可操作性分析
问题陈述:睡眠磨牙症的特点是在睡眠中磨牙,通常用咬合装置治疗。尽管YouTube上有大量讨论咬合装置治疗的视频,但它们的教育质量仍不清楚。目的:本审核的目的是评估牙科专业人员提供的YouTube视频中有关咬合装置治疗睡眠磨牙的信息的教育价值(EV)、清晰度(COI)、可靠性(ROI)、可理解性(UOI)和可操作性(AOI)。材料和方法:使用4个搜索词对YouTube进行系统搜索。使用预先确定的标准共确定了19个录象。在10个预先确定的领域使用4分评分系统评估EV。COI采用3分制评分。采用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准评价ROI。使用患者教育材料视听材料评估工具(PEMAT-A/V)测定UOI和AOI。使用统计软件程序进行描述性统计、判读间和判读内信度检验。结果:上传视频最多的是全科医生(95%),其次是正畸医生(5%)。报告的平均域数为4.68±2.73(满分10分),其中得分最高的域为“咬合装置适应症”(1.24±0.87),得分最低的域为“咬合装置成本”(0.00±0.00)。总体而言,每个视频的EV得分为5.61±5.10(满分为30),而COI得分为0.55±0.50(满分为2)。ROI平均为1.95±0.40(满分为4),其中“归因”得分最低(0.026±0.11),“货币”得分最高(1)。总体而言,视频的平均可理解性为66.6%,可操作性为45.6%。结论:牙科专业人员上传的视频缺乏足够的关于咬合装置成本的教育价值。视频资料来源的可信度较低,可理解性和可操作性较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信