Swimming kinematics of rainbow trout behind a 3×5 cylinder array: a computationally driven experimental approach to understanding fish locomotion.

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Journal of Experimental Biology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1242/jeb.247873
David Sparks, Edwin Rajeev, Subhra Shankha Koley, Alberto Canestrelli, James C Liao
{"title":"Swimming kinematics of rainbow trout behind a 3×5 cylinder array: a computationally driven experimental approach to understanding fish locomotion.","authors":"David Sparks, Edwin Rajeev, Subhra Shankha Koley, Alberto Canestrelli, James C Liao","doi":"10.1242/jeb.247873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fish in the wild often contend with complex flows that are produced by natural and artificial structures. Research into fish interactions with turbulence often investigates metrics such as turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) or fish positional location, with less focus on the specific interactions between vortex organization and body swimming kinematics. Here, we compared the swimming kinematics of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) holding station in flows produced by two different 3×5 cylinder arrays. We systematically utilized computational fluid dynamics to identify one array that produced a Kármán vortex street with high vortex periodicity (KVS array) and another that produced low periodicity, similar to a parallel vortex street (PVS array), both validated with particle image velocimetry. The only difference in swimming kinematics between cylinder arrays was an increased tail beat amplitude in the KVS array. In both cylinder arrays, the tail beat frequency decreased and snout amplitude increased compared with the freestream. The center of mass amplitude was greater in the PVS array than in only the freestream, however, suggesting some buffeting of the body by the fluid. Notably, we did not observe Kármán gaiting in the KVS array as in previous studies. We hypothesize that this is because (1) vorticity was dissipated in the region where fish held station or (2) vortices were in-line rather than staggered. These results are the first to quantify the kinematics and behavior of fishes swimming in the wake of multiple cylinder arrays, which has important implications for biomechanics, fluid dynamics and fisheries management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":"227 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.247873","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fish in the wild often contend with complex flows that are produced by natural and artificial structures. Research into fish interactions with turbulence often investigates metrics such as turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) or fish positional location, with less focus on the specific interactions between vortex organization and body swimming kinematics. Here, we compared the swimming kinematics of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) holding station in flows produced by two different 3×5 cylinder arrays. We systematically utilized computational fluid dynamics to identify one array that produced a Kármán vortex street with high vortex periodicity (KVS array) and another that produced low periodicity, similar to a parallel vortex street (PVS array), both validated with particle image velocimetry. The only difference in swimming kinematics between cylinder arrays was an increased tail beat amplitude in the KVS array. In both cylinder arrays, the tail beat frequency decreased and snout amplitude increased compared with the freestream. The center of mass amplitude was greater in the PVS array than in only the freestream, however, suggesting some buffeting of the body by the fluid. Notably, we did not observe Kármán gaiting in the KVS array as in previous studies. We hypothesize that this is because (1) vorticity was dissipated in the region where fish held station or (2) vortices were in-line rather than staggered. These results are the first to quantify the kinematics and behavior of fishes swimming in the wake of multiple cylinder arrays, which has important implications for biomechanics, fluid dynamics and fisheries management.

游泳运动学的虹鳟鱼背后3×5圆柱阵列:一个计算驱动的实验方法来理解鱼的运动。
野外的鱼类经常要应付由自然和人工结构产生的复杂水流。对鱼类与湍流相互作用的研究通常考察湍流动能(TKE)或鱼类位置等指标,而较少关注漩涡组织与身体游泳运动学之间的具体相互作用。在这里,我们比较了虹鳟鱼(Oncorhynchus mykiss)持有站在两种不同3×5圆柱体阵列产生的流动中的游泳运动学。我们系统地利用计算流体动力学来识别一种产生高周期性Kármán涡街的阵列(KVS阵列)和另一种产生低周期性的阵列,类似于平行涡街(PVS阵列),两者都通过粒子图像测速验证。唯一不同的游泳运动学之间的圆柱阵列是增加尾拍幅度在KVS阵列。与自由流相比,两种圆柱阵列的尾拍频率均有所降低,吻部幅值有所增加。然而,在PVS阵列中,质心振幅比在自由流中更大,这表明流体对身体有一定的抖振。值得注意的是,我们没有像以前的研究那样在KVS阵列中观察到Kármán步态。我们假设这是因为(1)涡度在鱼类停留的区域消散,或者(2)涡是直线的而不是交错的。这些结果首次量化了鱼类在多圆柱体阵列尾迹中游动的运动学和行为,这对生物力学、流体动力学和渔业管理具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信