Predictors of Persistent Residual Stones After Second Look Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0610
Jessica C Dai, Hersh Trivedi, Vineeth Kommidi, Jodi A Antonelli, Margaret S Pearle, Brett A Johnson
{"title":"Predictors of Persistent Residual Stones After Second Look Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.","authors":"Jessica C Dai, Hersh Trivedi, Vineeth Kommidi, Jodi A Antonelli, Margaret S Pearle, Brett A Johnson","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Second look flexible nephroscopy (SLFN) is often offered after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, even after SLFN, residual fragments (RFs) occasionally persist. We sought to determine the incidence of persistent RFs in patients who undergo SLFN for RFs after PCNL and to identify parameters predictive of persistent RFs. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We identified all patients at our institution with RFs on post-PCNL computed tomography (CT) that underwent SLFN between 1/2016 and 5/2020. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, and perioperative parameters were analyzed for each study patient. Post-SLFN fragments were identified on either follow-up kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph or CT imaging obtained within 3 months of PCNL. Multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVA) was performed to identify predictors of persistent fragments. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 201 renal units met the inclusion criteria. The median size of the largest RF at the time of SLFN was 5 mm (IQR 2-8) and the median cumulative RF stone size was 8 mm (IQR 5-14). The final stone-free rate of patients with RFs on initial PCNL who then underwent SLFN was 60.7% (<i>n</i> = 122). The median cumulative RF stone size and the median size of the largest RF post SLFN was 6.5 mm (IQR 4-12) and 5 mm (IQR 3-8), respectively. On MVA, bilateral preoperative stones and greater RF stone burden at time of SLFN were independent predictors of radiographically detected post-SLFN fragments. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Among patients who underwent SLFN for RFs after PCNL, 60% were rendered stone-free. Patients with bilateral stones prior to PCNL and greater RF stone burden at time of SLFN are more likely to have persistent fragments, despite attempts at aggressive stone removal during both the initial PCNL and subsequent SLFN. The risk of adverse stone events from such fragments is unknown and may be lower because of their inaccessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"26-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Second look flexible nephroscopy (SLFN) is often offered after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, even after SLFN, residual fragments (RFs) occasionally persist. We sought to determine the incidence of persistent RFs in patients who undergo SLFN for RFs after PCNL and to identify parameters predictive of persistent RFs. Methods: We identified all patients at our institution with RFs on post-PCNL computed tomography (CT) that underwent SLFN between 1/2016 and 5/2020. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, and perioperative parameters were analyzed for each study patient. Post-SLFN fragments were identified on either follow-up kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph or CT imaging obtained within 3 months of PCNL. Multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVA) was performed to identify predictors of persistent fragments. Results: A total of 201 renal units met the inclusion criteria. The median size of the largest RF at the time of SLFN was 5 mm (IQR 2-8) and the median cumulative RF stone size was 8 mm (IQR 5-14). The final stone-free rate of patients with RFs on initial PCNL who then underwent SLFN was 60.7% (n = 122). The median cumulative RF stone size and the median size of the largest RF post SLFN was 6.5 mm (IQR 4-12) and 5 mm (IQR 3-8), respectively. On MVA, bilateral preoperative stones and greater RF stone burden at time of SLFN were independent predictors of radiographically detected post-SLFN fragments. Conclusions: Among patients who underwent SLFN for RFs after PCNL, 60% were rendered stone-free. Patients with bilateral stones prior to PCNL and greater RF stone burden at time of SLFN are more likely to have persistent fragments, despite attempts at aggressive stone removal during both the initial PCNL and subsequent SLFN. The risk of adverse stone events from such fragments is unknown and may be lower because of their inaccessibility.

经皮肾镜取石术后结石残留的预测因素。
导读:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)后,常进行二次柔性肾镜检查(SLFN)。然而,即使在SLFN之后,残留片段(RFs)偶尔也会持续存在。我们试图确定PCNL后接受SLFN治疗的患者持续性RFs的发生率,并确定预测持续性RFs的参数。方法:在2016年1月至2020年5月期间,我们选取了我院所有在pcnl后计算机断层扫描(CT)上有RFs的患者。分析每位研究患者的患者人口统计学、结石特征和围手术期参数。在PCNL术后3个月内随访的肾脏、输尿管和膀胱x线片或CT图像上发现slfn后碎片。采用多变量逻辑回归分析(MVA)来确定持续性碎片的预测因子。结果:共有201个肾单位符合纳入标准。SLFN时最大RF的中位尺寸为5 mm (IQR 2-8),累积RF结石的中位尺寸为8 mm (IQR 5-14)。在初始PCNL患者中,接受SLFN治疗的RFs患者的最终无结石率为60.7% (n = 122)。累积RF结石的中位大小和最大RF后SLFN的中位大小分别为6.5 mm (IQR 4-12)和5 mm (IQR 3-8)。在MVA中,双侧术前结石和SLFN时更大的RF结石负担是SLFN后影像学检测碎片的独立预测因素。结论:在PCNL后接受SLFN治疗RFs的患者中,60%的患者无结石。PCNL前双侧结石患者和SLFN时RF结石负担较大的患者更有可能存在持续性碎片,尽管在最初的PCNL和随后的SLFN期间都尝试了积极的结石清除。这些碎片导致不良结石事件的风险尚不清楚,可能因为它们难以接近而更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信