Quantifying Cervical Rotation Smoothness: Exploring Various Jerk Metrics and Test-Retest Reliability of Jerk, Range of Motion, and Head Repositioning Accuracy.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112448
Morten Bilde Simonsen, Tróndur Fríði Tróndarson, Diego Martínez-Echevarría, Thorvaldur Skúli Pálsson, Steffan Wittrup McPhee Christensen
{"title":"Quantifying Cervical Rotation Smoothness: Exploring Various Jerk Metrics and Test-Retest Reliability of Jerk, Range of Motion, and Head Repositioning Accuracy.","authors":"Morten Bilde Simonsen, Tróndur Fríði Tróndarson, Diego Martínez-Echevarría, Thorvaldur Skúli Pálsson, Steffan Wittrup McPhee Christensen","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of smoothness, range of motion (ROM), and head repositioning accuracy (HRA) has gained attention in identifying sensorimotor impairments. Uncertainty persists on the approach for acquiring reliable measures, including choice of smoothness metric, normalization factors, and the required number of measurements for reliable results. This study aimed to address this uncertainty. Thirty healthy participants were included in this single-session randomized cross-over study. The experiment consisted of two parts. One focused on the test-retest assessment of head ROM into right rotation to the end of range from a neutral position using a self-selected movement speed and the HRA when returning to the start-position. In the other part, participants repeated the previous tasks and performed head rotations at slower and faster speeds than their self-selected pace and to the beat of a metronome. All tasks were repeated ten times. For the test-retest, the inter-class-correlation (ICC) values for ROM were between 0.84-0.91, 0.20-0.31 for HRA, and 0.65-0.90 for jerk for 1-10 repetitions. Normalizing jerk through v<sub>mean</sub> and v<sub>peak</sub> had similar variability and appeared equally valid for our data. However, normalizing by v<sub>max</sub> ensures desirable properties in the smoothness metric. Lower variability was observed when standardizing movements using a metronome. Based on test-retest findings, three repetitions are recommended, as ICC values show marginal improvement beyond 2-3 repetitions, providing limited additional value.</p>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"178 ","pages":"112448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of smoothness, range of motion (ROM), and head repositioning accuracy (HRA) has gained attention in identifying sensorimotor impairments. Uncertainty persists on the approach for acquiring reliable measures, including choice of smoothness metric, normalization factors, and the required number of measurements for reliable results. This study aimed to address this uncertainty. Thirty healthy participants were included in this single-session randomized cross-over study. The experiment consisted of two parts. One focused on the test-retest assessment of head ROM into right rotation to the end of range from a neutral position using a self-selected movement speed and the HRA when returning to the start-position. In the other part, participants repeated the previous tasks and performed head rotations at slower and faster speeds than their self-selected pace and to the beat of a metronome. All tasks were repeated ten times. For the test-retest, the inter-class-correlation (ICC) values for ROM were between 0.84-0.91, 0.20-0.31 for HRA, and 0.65-0.90 for jerk for 1-10 repetitions. Normalizing jerk through vmean and vpeak had similar variability and appeared equally valid for our data. However, normalizing by vmax ensures desirable properties in the smoothness metric. Lower variability was observed when standardizing movements using a metronome. Based on test-retest findings, three repetitions are recommended, as ICC values show marginal improvement beyond 2-3 repetitions, providing limited additional value.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信