Serum adipocytokines and inflammatory cytokines in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: clinical utility and development of a risk prediction model.
{"title":"Serum adipocytokines and inflammatory cytokines in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: clinical utility and development of a risk prediction model.","authors":"Kezhuo Liu, Huihui Wang","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2024.2438714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study analyzed the clinical utility of serum adipocytokines and inflammatory cytokines in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and developed a quantitative nomogram prediction model.</p><p><strong>Research design & methods: </strong>General data were collected. Fasting venous blood was taken and levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), serum adipocytokines, and inflammatory cytokines were assessed. The main risk factors for GDM were analyzed by implementing univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The weights of the main risk factors were assigned, and the nomogram prediction model for GDM was developed by R software. The efficacy of the nomogram model for GDM prediction was measured and analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation group possessed a higher proportion of family history of diabetes, raised FPG, LEP, Visfatin, hs-CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α contents, and lower ADP contents (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis displayed that LEP, ADP, and IL-6 were the main risk factors for GDM (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Calibration curve was basically consistent with the original curve, suggesting good accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Serum adipocytokines and inflammatory cytokines were the main risk factors for GDM. Developing a nomogram model can facilitate early diagnosis of GDM by physicians, allowing for timely interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2024.2438714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study analyzed the clinical utility of serum adipocytokines and inflammatory cytokines in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and developed a quantitative nomogram prediction model.
Research design & methods: General data were collected. Fasting venous blood was taken and levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), serum adipocytokines, and inflammatory cytokines were assessed. The main risk factors for GDM were analyzed by implementing univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The weights of the main risk factors were assigned, and the nomogram prediction model for GDM was developed by R software. The efficacy of the nomogram model for GDM prediction was measured and analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve.
Results: The observation group possessed a higher proportion of family history of diabetes, raised FPG, LEP, Visfatin, hs-CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α contents, and lower ADP contents (all p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis displayed that LEP, ADP, and IL-6 were the main risk factors for GDM (p < 0.05). Calibration curve was basically consistent with the original curve, suggesting good accuracy.
Conclusion: Serum adipocytokines and inflammatory cytokines were the main risk factors for GDM. Developing a nomogram model can facilitate early diagnosis of GDM by physicians, allowing for timely interventions.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology.
Articles focus on the following key areas:
• Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines
• Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents
• New diagnostic approaches
• Screening and patient stratification
• Pharmacoeconomic studies
• New therapeutic indications for existing therapies
• Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction
• Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval
• Novel treatment strategies
• Epidemiological studies
• Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines
Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.