Risk of Surgical Overtreatment in cN1 Breast Cancer Patients who Become ypN0 After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: SLNB Versus TAD.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16625-7
Alison Laws, Saskia Leonard, Julie Vincuilla, Tonia Parker, Olga Kantor, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Anna Weiss, Tari A King
{"title":"Risk of Surgical Overtreatment in cN1 Breast Cancer Patients who Become ypN0 After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: SLNB Versus TAD.","authors":"Alison Laws, Saskia Leonard, Julie Vincuilla, Tonia Parker, Olga Kantor, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Anna Weiss, Tari A King","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16625-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two surgical approaches have emerged for axillary staging in cN1 breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC): sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and targeted axillary dissection (TAD). Direct comparisons of technical and oncological outcomes with SLNB versus TAD are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We routinely performed SLNB from 2017 to 2018 for cN1 breast cancer patients who converted to cN0 after NAC, then adopted TAD from 2019 to 2022. To minimize the false-negative rate (FNR), we required retrieval of ≥3 sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) (2017-2018) or retrieval of the clipped node (CN) and ≥2 SLN (2019-2022). In ypN0 cases meeting these criteria, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was omitted. We compared the rate of per-protocol required ALND due to technical failure of SLNB versus TAD and reported axillary recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 191 cN1 ypN0 patients, 77 underwent SLNB and 114 underwent TAD. The overall rate of required ALND due to technical failure was 14.7% and did not differ between SLNB versus TAD (16.9% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.38). The most common technical failure with SLNB was retrieving <3 SLN (10.4%); for TAD, it was not retrieving the CN (7.1%). Median follow-up was 3.9 years for SLNB patients and 1.7 years for TAD patients; there were 1 (1.3%) and 0 (0.0%) axillary recurrences, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sentinel lymph node biopsy and TAD for cN1 patients after NAC showed equivalent technical failure rates and low axillary recurrence rates. When applying strict criteria to minimize FNR of axillary staging surgery, approximately 15% of ypN0 patients may be overtreated with ALND.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2023-2028"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16625-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Two surgical approaches have emerged for axillary staging in cN1 breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC): sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and targeted axillary dissection (TAD). Direct comparisons of technical and oncological outcomes with SLNB versus TAD are lacking.

Methods: We routinely performed SLNB from 2017 to 2018 for cN1 breast cancer patients who converted to cN0 after NAC, then adopted TAD from 2019 to 2022. To minimize the false-negative rate (FNR), we required retrieval of ≥3 sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) (2017-2018) or retrieval of the clipped node (CN) and ≥2 SLN (2019-2022). In ypN0 cases meeting these criteria, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was omitted. We compared the rate of per-protocol required ALND due to technical failure of SLNB versus TAD and reported axillary recurrence rates.

Results: Among 191 cN1 ypN0 patients, 77 underwent SLNB and 114 underwent TAD. The overall rate of required ALND due to technical failure was 14.7% and did not differ between SLNB versus TAD (16.9% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.38). The most common technical failure with SLNB was retrieving <3 SLN (10.4%); for TAD, it was not retrieving the CN (7.1%). Median follow-up was 3.9 years for SLNB patients and 1.7 years for TAD patients; there were 1 (1.3%) and 0 (0.0%) axillary recurrences, respectively.

Conclusions: Sentinel lymph node biopsy and TAD for cN1 patients after NAC showed equivalent technical failure rates and low axillary recurrence rates. When applying strict criteria to minimize FNR of axillary staging surgery, approximately 15% of ypN0 patients may be overtreated with ALND.

新辅助化疗后变为ypN0的cN1乳腺癌患者手术过度治疗的风险:SLNB vs TAD
背景:新辅助化疗(NAC)后cN1乳腺癌患者腋窝分期出现了两种手术方法:前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)和靶向腋窝清扫(TAD)。SLNB与TAD的技术和肿瘤学结果缺乏直接比较。方法:我们于2017 - 2018年对NAC后转为cN0的cN1乳腺癌患者常规行SLNB,并于2019 - 2022年采用TAD。为了尽量减少假阴性率(FNR),我们要求检索≥3个前哨淋巴结(SLN)(2017-2018)或检索夹住的淋巴结(CN)和≥2个SLN(2019-2022)。在符合这些标准的ypN0病例中,省略了腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)。我们比较了SLNB与TAD技术失败导致的按方案要求的ALND发生率,并报告了腋窝复发率。结果:191例cn1ypn0患者中,77例行SLNB, 114例行TAD。由于技术故障所需ALND的总比率为14.7%,SLNB与TAD之间没有差异(16.9%对13.2%,p = 0.38)。结论:NAC后cN1患者前哨淋巴结活检和TAD的技术失败率相当,腋窝复发率低。当采用严格的标准来减少腋窝分期手术的FNR时,大约15%的ypN0患者可能会过度治疗ALND。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信