{"title":"Case Report: Salvation of a congested SCIP flap with a modified \"chemical leech\" technique.","authors":"Yong Zhao, Xianquan Yang, Shaobo Zhu, Aixi Yu","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1436599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap is a widely accepted workhorse flap for covering defects. Although the success rate of SCIP flaps is currently high, flap failure occurs occasionally due to venous congestion. Venous re-anastomosis is the ideal rescue method but is sometimes limited by poor venule condition. The \"chemical leech\" technique could relieve venous congestion without venous re-anastomosis. However, owing to insufficient offloading, this technique is less effective in free flaps than in fasciocutaneous flaps, especially large-volume flaps. In this case report, we modified the \"chemical leech\" technique by adding a venous catheter. Congested blood was drained in a 2-way manner, both through a venous catheter and the skin incisions. On the first day, congested blood was mainly drained through the catheter. Intermittent heparin irrigation was required to maintain the blood flow. On days 2 and 3, as the microcirculation improved, the flow regulator was turned down to reduce blood loss. Blood loss through the catheter decreased dramatically from day 4 onward. This was probably due to thrombosis in and around the catheter. Another pathway through the skin still worked until the establishment of microcirculation, which occurred on day 8. Compared to previous \"chemical leech\" therapy, the modified \"chemical leech\" therapy was more reliable and could help drain the congested blood on venule level in addition to capillary level, making the blood drainage more efficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1436599"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1436599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap is a widely accepted workhorse flap for covering defects. Although the success rate of SCIP flaps is currently high, flap failure occurs occasionally due to venous congestion. Venous re-anastomosis is the ideal rescue method but is sometimes limited by poor venule condition. The "chemical leech" technique could relieve venous congestion without venous re-anastomosis. However, owing to insufficient offloading, this technique is less effective in free flaps than in fasciocutaneous flaps, especially large-volume flaps. In this case report, we modified the "chemical leech" technique by adding a venous catheter. Congested blood was drained in a 2-way manner, both through a venous catheter and the skin incisions. On the first day, congested blood was mainly drained through the catheter. Intermittent heparin irrigation was required to maintain the blood flow. On days 2 and 3, as the microcirculation improved, the flow regulator was turned down to reduce blood loss. Blood loss through the catheter decreased dramatically from day 4 onward. This was probably due to thrombosis in and around the catheter. Another pathway through the skin still worked until the establishment of microcirculation, which occurred on day 8. Compared to previous "chemical leech" therapy, the modified "chemical leech" therapy was more reliable and could help drain the congested blood on venule level in addition to capillary level, making the blood drainage more efficient.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.