Bridge to Heart Transplant With Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: Trends and Outcomes in the 2018 Allocation Policy Era.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002352
Ander Dorken-Gallastegi, Yeahwa Hong, Nicholas R Hess, Luke A Ziegler, Mohamed Abdullah, Nidhi Iyanna, Raj Ramanan, Gavin W Hickey, Mary E Keebler, David J Kaczorowski
{"title":"Bridge to Heart Transplant With Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: Trends and Outcomes in the 2018 Allocation Policy Era.","authors":"Ander Dorken-Gallastegi, Yeahwa Hong, Nicholas R Hess, Luke A Ziegler, Mohamed Abdullah, Nidhi Iyanna, Raj Ramanan, Gavin W Hickey, Mary E Keebler, David J Kaczorowski","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) 2018 heart allocation policy prioritizes patients receiving temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) given the high waitlist mortality rate of this group. This study evaluates national trends and waitlist outcomes for patients receiving tMCS under the UNOS 2018 allocation policy. Adult patients waitlisted for isolated heart transplantation were included using the UNOS database. The prevalence of tMCS, 90 day waitlist mortality, 90 day incidence of transplantation, and posttransplant 1 year mortality were analyzed. A total of 27,343 patients were waitlisted during the study period (pre-policy change: 13,004 vs . post-policy change: 14,339). The prevalence of tMCS increased from 7.4% (n: 956) to 22.4% (n: 3,186) after the policy change ( p < 0.001). The use of Impella increased proportionally among tMCS modalities. Patients on tMCS had lower adjusted odds of waitlist mortality ( p < 0.001), higher adjusted incidence of transplantation ( p < 0.001), and similar posttransplant mortality ( p = 0.10) under the 2018 policy. Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support had the highest odds of 90 day waitlist mortality ( p < 0.05) but also the highest incidence of transplantation in the post-policy change cohort ( p < 0.05). In conclusion, the use of tMCS as bridge to heart transplantation increased threefolds and is associated with lower waitlist mortality and higher incidence of transplantation following the UNOS 2018 allocation policy change.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"571-578"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) 2018 heart allocation policy prioritizes patients receiving temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) given the high waitlist mortality rate of this group. This study evaluates national trends and waitlist outcomes for patients receiving tMCS under the UNOS 2018 allocation policy. Adult patients waitlisted for isolated heart transplantation were included using the UNOS database. The prevalence of tMCS, 90 day waitlist mortality, 90 day incidence of transplantation, and posttransplant 1 year mortality were analyzed. A total of 27,343 patients were waitlisted during the study period (pre-policy change: 13,004 vs . post-policy change: 14,339). The prevalence of tMCS increased from 7.4% (n: 956) to 22.4% (n: 3,186) after the policy change ( p < 0.001). The use of Impella increased proportionally among tMCS modalities. Patients on tMCS had lower adjusted odds of waitlist mortality ( p < 0.001), higher adjusted incidence of transplantation ( p < 0.001), and similar posttransplant mortality ( p = 0.10) under the 2018 policy. Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support had the highest odds of 90 day waitlist mortality ( p < 0.05) but also the highest incidence of transplantation in the post-policy change cohort ( p < 0.05). In conclusion, the use of tMCS as bridge to heart transplantation increased threefolds and is associated with lower waitlist mortality and higher incidence of transplantation following the UNOS 2018 allocation policy change.

临时机械循环支持心脏移植的桥梁:2018年分配政策时代的趋势和结果。
联合器官共享网络(UNOS) 2018年心脏分配政策优先考虑接受临时机械循环支持(tMCS)的患者,因为这一群体的等待死亡率很高。本研究评估了UNOS 2018年分配政策下接受tMCS的患者的全国趋势和等待名单结果。等待孤立心脏移植的成年患者被纳入UNOS数据库。分析tMCS患病率、90天等待死亡率、90天移植发病率和移植后1年死亡率。在研究期间,共有27,343名患者被列入候补名单(政策改变前:13,004对政策改变后:14,339)。政策改变后,tMCS患病率从7.4% (n: 956)上升到22.4% (n: 3186) (p < 0.001)。在tMCS模式中,Impella的使用按比例增加。在2018年的政策下,tMCS患者的等待名单死亡率调整几率较低(p < 0.001),移植发病率调整几率较高(p < 0.001),移植后死亡率相似(p = 0.10)。接受体外膜氧合(ECMO)支持的患者90天等待死亡率最高(p < 0.05),但在政策改变后队列中移植发生率也最高(p < 0.05)。总之,在2018年分配政策改变后,使用tMCS作为心脏移植的桥梁增加了三倍,并且与较低的等待名单死亡率和较高的移植发生率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信