Aubrey M Demchuk, Ingrid M Esteves, Bruce L McNaughton
{"title":"Non-maternal nest building behaviours in mice predict bilateral dorsal hippocampal lesion extent.","authors":"Aubrey M Demchuk, Ingrid M Esteves, Bruce L McNaughton","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lesions and pharmacological inactivation of the hippocampus have long been important tools for assessing the critical role of the hippocampus in learning and memory. Such studies often require a substantial investment of time and resources and, so, a tool for estimating lesion extent and screening animals prior to histological verification would be of considerable utility. Mice with bilateral hippocampal lesions have previously been observed to be deficient at nest building. Therefore, non-maternal nest construction was assessed as a predictor of the extent of hippocampal lesions. Mice with complete bilateral dorsal hippocampal lesions (comprising >50 % of the total volume of both hippocampi) exhibited severe deficits in nest building, failing to shred and/or gather nesting materials. In contrast, incomplete dorsal hippocampal lesions were not sufficient to cause impairments. Overall, among both male and female mice, nest construction score was highly positively correlated with the total volume of intact dorsal hippocampus. Importantly, reduced nesting behaviours could not be explained by gross motor deficits, which were evaluated by running performance on a non-motorized treadmill. Altogether, spontaneous nest building behaviour was confirmed to be a simple, cost-effective, and reliable predictor of bilateral dorsal hippocampal lesion extent in an otherwise healthy mouse strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"115366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lesions and pharmacological inactivation of the hippocampus have long been important tools for assessing the critical role of the hippocampus in learning and memory. Such studies often require a substantial investment of time and resources and, so, a tool for estimating lesion extent and screening animals prior to histological verification would be of considerable utility. Mice with bilateral hippocampal lesions have previously been observed to be deficient at nest building. Therefore, non-maternal nest construction was assessed as a predictor of the extent of hippocampal lesions. Mice with complete bilateral dorsal hippocampal lesions (comprising >50 % of the total volume of both hippocampi) exhibited severe deficits in nest building, failing to shred and/or gather nesting materials. In contrast, incomplete dorsal hippocampal lesions were not sufficient to cause impairments. Overall, among both male and female mice, nest construction score was highly positively correlated with the total volume of intact dorsal hippocampus. Importantly, reduced nesting behaviours could not be explained by gross motor deficits, which were evaluated by running performance on a non-motorized treadmill. Altogether, spontaneous nest building behaviour was confirmed to be a simple, cost-effective, and reliable predictor of bilateral dorsal hippocampal lesion extent in an otherwise healthy mouse strain.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.