Investigation of Minipigs as the Optimal Non-rodent Pre-clinical Species: Exploring Plasma Protein Binding of Marketed Cardiovascular Drugs Across Species

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Subodh Mondal, Ritika Uppal, Satish CS
{"title":"Investigation of Minipigs as the Optimal Non-rodent Pre-clinical Species: Exploring Plasma Protein Binding of Marketed Cardiovascular Drugs Across Species","authors":"Subodh Mondal,&nbsp;Ritika Uppal,&nbsp;Satish CS","doi":"10.1208/s12249-024-03005-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pre-clinical studies in animals are an essential part of drug development for new chemical entities. Before clinical trials in humans, submission of safety data from one rodent and one non-rodent species is compulsory as per regulatory guidelines. Even though minipigs and monkeys are physiologically closer to humans, dogs are usually employed as the non-rodent pre-clinical species. In this study, the <i>in vitro</i> plasma protein binding of eleven marketed cardiovascular drugs was studied in dog, minipig, monkey and human to determine the preferred species. To conduct plasma protein binding studies, the most reliable equilibrium dialysis method was adopted. Ten out of eleven tested cardiovascular drugs showed statistically similar plasma protein binding in minipig and human plasma which was different from dog and monkey plasma. The results from the studies showed greater similarity between minipigs and humans suggesting that the minipig species maybe a better pre-clinical non-rodent model during drug development of cardiovascular drugs instead of the conventional dog species. Additionally, use of the more accessible minipig species may help in saving time, and resources during pre-clinical studies and may also be more predictive during the safety studies in humans during later stage clinical trials.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":6925,"journal":{"name":"AAPS PharmSciTech","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1208/s12249-024-03005-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS PharmSciTech","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1208/s12249-024-03005-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pre-clinical studies in animals are an essential part of drug development for new chemical entities. Before clinical trials in humans, submission of safety data from one rodent and one non-rodent species is compulsory as per regulatory guidelines. Even though minipigs and monkeys are physiologically closer to humans, dogs are usually employed as the non-rodent pre-clinical species. In this study, the in vitro plasma protein binding of eleven marketed cardiovascular drugs was studied in dog, minipig, monkey and human to determine the preferred species. To conduct plasma protein binding studies, the most reliable equilibrium dialysis method was adopted. Ten out of eleven tested cardiovascular drugs showed statistically similar plasma protein binding in minipig and human plasma which was different from dog and monkey plasma. The results from the studies showed greater similarity between minipigs and humans suggesting that the minipig species maybe a better pre-clinical non-rodent model during drug development of cardiovascular drugs instead of the conventional dog species. Additionally, use of the more accessible minipig species may help in saving time, and resources during pre-clinical studies and may also be more predictive during the safety studies in humans during later stage clinical trials.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AAPS PharmSciTech
AAPS PharmSciTech 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
264
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: AAPS PharmSciTech is a peer-reviewed, online-only journal committed to serving those pharmaceutical scientists and engineers interested in the research, development, and evaluation of pharmaceutical dosage forms and delivery systems, including drugs derived from biotechnology and the manufacturing science pertaining to the commercialization of such dosage forms. Because of its electronic nature, AAPS PharmSciTech aspires to utilize evolving electronic technology to enable faster and diverse mechanisms of information delivery to its readership. Submission of uninvited expert reviews and research articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信