Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) and Anxiety in Adolescence: Preference for CMC, Social Media Burden, and Attention Bias to Threat

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Jennifer Lynn de Rutte, Tracy A. Dennis-Tiwary, Amy K. Roy
{"title":"Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) and Anxiety in Adolescence: Preference for CMC, Social Media Burden, and Attention Bias to Threat","authors":"Jennifer Lynn de Rutte,&nbsp;Tracy A. Dennis-Tiwary,&nbsp;Amy K. Roy","doi":"10.1007/s42761-024-00253-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite societal and empirical interest in the impact of computer-mediated communication (CMC) on anxiety in adolescents, little is known about the associations between specific aspects of CMC use and anxiety severity and the role of individual vulnerability factors. In this study, we examined the links between two contexts of CMC, preference for CMC over face-to-face interactions and perceived social media social media burden, along with an anxiety-related cognitive vulnerability factor and attention bias to threat. Participants were mildly to severely anxious 12- to 14-year-olds (<i>N</i> = 78, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 12.89, 55% female). They self-reported on CMC preferences and social media burden and on anxiety symptoms in two domains (generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and social anxiety) and completed an eye-tracking assessment of attention bias. We tested the hypothesis that preferring CMC over face-to-face communications and perceiving greater social media burden would predict more severe anxiety symptoms, particularly among those with greater attention bias to threat. As predicted, greater feelings of social media burden predicted more severe anxiety symptom severity (GAD only) but only among those with greater attention bias to threat. The potential role of attention bias in associations between CMC and adolescent anxiety and the specificity of effects on GAD symptom severity is discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"5 4","pages":"377 - 388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-024-00253-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite societal and empirical interest in the impact of computer-mediated communication (CMC) on anxiety in adolescents, little is known about the associations between specific aspects of CMC use and anxiety severity and the role of individual vulnerability factors. In this study, we examined the links between two contexts of CMC, preference for CMC over face-to-face interactions and perceived social media social media burden, along with an anxiety-related cognitive vulnerability factor and attention bias to threat. Participants were mildly to severely anxious 12- to 14-year-olds (N = 78, Mage = 12.89, 55% female). They self-reported on CMC preferences and social media burden and on anxiety symptoms in two domains (generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and social anxiety) and completed an eye-tracking assessment of attention bias. We tested the hypothesis that preferring CMC over face-to-face communications and perceiving greater social media burden would predict more severe anxiety symptoms, particularly among those with greater attention bias to threat. As predicted, greater feelings of social media burden predicted more severe anxiety symptom severity (GAD only) but only among those with greater attention bias to threat. The potential role of attention bias in associations between CMC and adolescent anxiety and the specificity of effects on GAD symptom severity is discussed.

计算机媒介传播与青少年焦虑:计算机媒介传播偏好、社交媒体负担和威胁注意偏向
尽管社会和实证对计算机媒介沟通(CMC)对青少年焦虑的影响感兴趣,但对CMC使用的特定方面与焦虑严重程度以及个体脆弱性因素的作用之间的关联知之甚少。在本研究中,我们考察了社交媒体的两种情境,即社交媒体对面对面互动的偏好和感知的社交媒体负担,以及与焦虑相关的认知脆弱性因素和对威胁的注意偏见之间的联系。参与者为轻度至重度焦虑的12至14岁儿童(N = 78, Mage = 12.89, 55%为女性)。他们自我报告了CMC偏好和社交媒体负担以及两个领域(广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)和社交焦虑)的焦虑症状,并完成了注意力偏差的眼动追踪评估。我们测试了这样的假设,即更喜欢CMC而不是面对面的交流,并感知到更大的社交媒体负担,可以预测更严重的焦虑症状,特别是在那些对威胁有更大注意力偏见的人中。正如预测的那样,更大的社交媒体负担感预示着更严重的焦虑症状严重程度(仅限广泛性焦虑症),但仅限于那些对威胁有更大注意力偏见的人。在CMC和青少年焦虑之间的关联中,注意偏差的潜在作用以及对广泛性焦虑症症状严重程度的特异性影响被讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信