Evaluating sustainable water management strategies using TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS methods

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Fang Han, Rami N. Alkhawaji, M. Mehdi Shafieezadeh
{"title":"Evaluating sustainable water management strategies using TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS methods","authors":"Fang Han,&nbsp;Rami N. Alkhawaji,&nbsp;M. Mehdi Shafieezadeh","doi":"10.1007/s13201-024-02336-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluates sustainable water management strategies using TOPSIS and Fuzzy TOPSIS (FTOPSIS) to address global water scarcity by comparing rainwater harvesting, water recycling, and desalination across five criteria: water efficiency, cost-effectiveness, environmental impact, social equity, and technological feasibility. The results show Rainwater Harvesting as the most balanced option with a relative closeness value of <span>\\({C}_{i}^{+}\\)</span>=0.640, excelling in social equity and environmental sustainability. Water Recycling ranks closely behind (<span>\\({C}_{i}^{+}\\)</span>=0.608), highlighting its adaptability and technological feasibility, while Desalination, though highly efficient, is hindered by lower cost-effectiveness (<span>\\({C}_{i}^{+}\\)</span>=0.578). By integrating TOPSIS and FTOPSIS, the study addresses uncertainties and subjective criteria, providing a robust multi-dimensional assessment framework for resource management. This methodology aids decision-makers in identifying strategies that align with sustainable development goals and adapt to regional priorities. Future work can expand this framework to include stakeholder engagement and policy factors, enhancing water management strategies for resilient, long-term solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8374,"journal":{"name":"Applied Water Science","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-024-02336-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Water Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-024-02336-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates sustainable water management strategies using TOPSIS and Fuzzy TOPSIS (FTOPSIS) to address global water scarcity by comparing rainwater harvesting, water recycling, and desalination across five criteria: water efficiency, cost-effectiveness, environmental impact, social equity, and technological feasibility. The results show Rainwater Harvesting as the most balanced option with a relative closeness value of \({C}_{i}^{+}\)=0.640, excelling in social equity and environmental sustainability. Water Recycling ranks closely behind (\({C}_{i}^{+}\)=0.608), highlighting its adaptability and technological feasibility, while Desalination, though highly efficient, is hindered by lower cost-effectiveness (\({C}_{i}^{+}\)=0.578). By integrating TOPSIS and FTOPSIS, the study addresses uncertainties and subjective criteria, providing a robust multi-dimensional assessment framework for resource management. This methodology aids decision-makers in identifying strategies that align with sustainable development goals and adapt to regional priorities. Future work can expand this framework to include stakeholder engagement and policy factors, enhancing water management strategies for resilient, long-term solutions.

利用TOPSIS和模糊TOPSIS方法评价可持续水资源管理策略
本研究利用TOPSIS和模糊TOPSIS (FTOPSIS)对可持续水资源管理策略进行评估,通过比较雨水收集、水循环和海水淡化五个标准(水效率、成本效益、环境影响、社会公平和技术可行性)来解决全球水资源短缺问题。结果表明,集雨方案是最平衡的方案,其相对接近值\({C}_{i}^{+}\) =0.640,在社会公平和环境可持续性方面表现优异。水循环紧随其后(\({C}_{i}^{+}\) =0.608),突出了其适应性和技术可行性,而海水淡化虽然效率很高,但成本效益较低(\({C}_{i}^{+}\) =0.578)。通过整合TOPSIS和FTOPSIS,该研究解决了不确定性和主观标准,为资源管理提供了一个强大的多维评估框架。这种方法有助于决策者确定符合可持续发展目标和适应区域优先事项的战略。未来的工作可以扩大这一框架,纳入利益相关者的参与和政策因素,加强水管理战略,以寻求有弹性的长期解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Water Science
Applied Water Science WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信