A bibliometric review of predictive modelling for cervical cancer risk.

Frontiers in research metrics and analytics Pub Date : 2024-11-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frma.2024.1493944
Francis Ngema, Bonginkosi Mdhluli, Pako Mmileng, Precious Shungube, Mokgoropo Makgaba, Twinomurinzi Hossana
{"title":"A bibliometric review of predictive modelling for cervical cancer risk.","authors":"Francis Ngema, Bonginkosi Mdhluli, Pako Mmileng, Precious Shungube, Mokgoropo Makgaba, Twinomurinzi Hossana","doi":"10.3389/frma.2024.1493944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cervical cancer represents a significant public health challenge, particularly affecting women's health globally. This study aims to advance the understanding of cervical cancer risk prediction research through a bibliometric analysis. The study identified 800 records from Scopus and Web of Science databases, which were reduced to 142 unique records after removing duplicates. Out of 100 abstracts assessed, 42 were excluded based on specific criteria, resulting in 58 studies included in the bibliometric review. Multiple scoping methods such as thematic analysis, citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, natural language processing, Latent Dirichlet Allocation and other visualisation techniques were used to analyse related publications between 2013 and 2024. The key findings revealed the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in cervical cancer risk prediction, integrating expertise from mathematical disciplines, biomedical health, healthcare practitioners, public health, and policy. This approach significantly enhanced the accuracy and efficiency of cervical cancer detection and predictive modelling by adopting advanced machine learning algorithms, such as random forests and support vector machines. The main challenges were the lack of external validation on independent datasets and the need to address model interpretability to ensure healthcare providers understand and trust the predictive models. The study revealed the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in cervical cancer risk prediction. It made recommendations for future research to focus on increasing the external validation of models, improving model interpretability, and promoting global research collaborations to enhance the comprehensiveness and applicability of cervical cancer risk prediction models.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":"9 ","pages":"1493944"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1493944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cervical cancer represents a significant public health challenge, particularly affecting women's health globally. This study aims to advance the understanding of cervical cancer risk prediction research through a bibliometric analysis. The study identified 800 records from Scopus and Web of Science databases, which were reduced to 142 unique records after removing duplicates. Out of 100 abstracts assessed, 42 were excluded based on specific criteria, resulting in 58 studies included in the bibliometric review. Multiple scoping methods such as thematic analysis, citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, natural language processing, Latent Dirichlet Allocation and other visualisation techniques were used to analyse related publications between 2013 and 2024. The key findings revealed the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in cervical cancer risk prediction, integrating expertise from mathematical disciplines, biomedical health, healthcare practitioners, public health, and policy. This approach significantly enhanced the accuracy and efficiency of cervical cancer detection and predictive modelling by adopting advanced machine learning algorithms, such as random forests and support vector machines. The main challenges were the lack of external validation on independent datasets and the need to address model interpretability to ensure healthcare providers understand and trust the predictive models. The study revealed the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in cervical cancer risk prediction. It made recommendations for future research to focus on increasing the external validation of models, improving model interpretability, and promoting global research collaborations to enhance the comprehensiveness and applicability of cervical cancer risk prediction models.

宫颈癌风险预测模型的文献计量学综述。
子宫颈癌是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,尤其影响到全球妇女的健康。本研究旨在通过文献计量分析加深对宫颈癌风险预测研究的认识。该研究从Scopus和Web of Science数据库中确定了800条记录,在删除重复记录后,这些记录减少到142条。在评估的100篇摘要中,根据特定标准排除了42篇,结果有58篇研究被纳入文献计量学综述。采用主题分析、引文分析、书目耦合、自然语言处理、潜狄利克雷分配等可视化技术对2013 - 2024年的相关出版物进行了分析。主要发现揭示了跨学科合作在宫颈癌风险预测中的重要性,整合了数学学科、生物医学卫生、医疗保健从业人员、公共卫生和政策方面的专业知识。该方法通过采用随机森林和支持向量机等先进的机器学习算法,显著提高了宫颈癌检测和预测建模的准确性和效率。主要挑战是缺乏对独立数据集的外部验证,以及需要解决模型可解释性问题,以确保医疗保健提供者理解和信任预测模型。该研究揭示了跨学科合作在宫颈癌风险预测中的重要性。建议今后的研究应侧重于增加模型的外部验证,提高模型的可解释性,促进全球研究合作,以提高宫颈癌风险预测模型的全面性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信