Saeed Asiri, Naif S Alzahrani, Hanan F Alharbi, Mohammad Yahya Ayoub
{"title":"Nurses' Knowledge Regarding Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis.","authors":"Saeed Asiri, Naif S Alzahrani, Hanan F Alharbi, Mohammad Yahya Ayoub","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S485306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD), is a skin injury brought on by protracted exposure to urine or feces in the gluteal, sacral, or perianal regions. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate nurses' level of knowledge, attitudes, social pressure, and intention to prevent IAD and to explore the factors that explain nurses' intention to prevent incontinence-associated dermatitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among staff nurses from two designated hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of the Incontinence-associated Dermatitis Questionnaire with 22 items (KAP-IAD-Q) on a five-agreement rating scale (1=<i>not agreeable</i> to <i>5=highly agreeable</i>) was used. Also, the intention to use deep vein thrombosis (DVT) preventive measures was rated on a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from 1=<i>strongly disagree</i> to 7=<i>strongly agree</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants showed that they had a sufficient knowledge (<i>M</i>= 48.2 ± 9.9) and, a positive attitude toward IAD prevention average score of 6.6 (<i>SD</i> ± 9.9) related to IAD etiology and risk factors. The perceived behavior to prevent IAD average was 5.1 (<i>SD</i> ± 3.9), showing that nurses had confidence and control in preventing IAD. The intention average score was 5.3 (<i>SD</i> ± 3.1), which indicates that nurses had the intention to prevent IAD. Furthermore, knowledge, attitude, social pressure, and perceived behavior to prevent IAD had a positive strong association with intention to prevent IAD (<i>r</i>= 0.547, <i>p</i> < 0.01; <i>r</i>= 0.564, <i>p</i> < 0.01; <i>r</i>= 0.579, <i>p</i> < 0.01; and <i>r</i> = 0.709, <i>p</i> < 0.01) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the critical role of knowledge, attitudes, social pressure, and perceived behavior in shaping nurses' intentions to prevent IAD. The findings demonstrate that nurses generally have a positive attitude and strong intention to prevent IAD, influenced by their level of education, hospital type, and clinical experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"17 ","pages":"2917-2928"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S485306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD), is a skin injury brought on by protracted exposure to urine or feces in the gluteal, sacral, or perianal regions. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate nurses' level of knowledge, attitudes, social pressure, and intention to prevent IAD and to explore the factors that explain nurses' intention to prevent incontinence-associated dermatitis.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among staff nurses from two designated hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of the Incontinence-associated Dermatitis Questionnaire with 22 items (KAP-IAD-Q) on a five-agreement rating scale (1=not agreeable to 5=highly agreeable) was used. Also, the intention to use deep vein thrombosis (DVT) preventive measures was rated on a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree.
Results: The participants showed that they had a sufficient knowledge (M= 48.2 ± 9.9) and, a positive attitude toward IAD prevention average score of 6.6 (SD ± 9.9) related to IAD etiology and risk factors. The perceived behavior to prevent IAD average was 5.1 (SD ± 3.9), showing that nurses had confidence and control in preventing IAD. The intention average score was 5.3 (SD ± 3.1), which indicates that nurses had the intention to prevent IAD. Furthermore, knowledge, attitude, social pressure, and perceived behavior to prevent IAD had a positive strong association with intention to prevent IAD (r= 0.547, p < 0.01; r= 0.564, p < 0.01; r= 0.579, p < 0.01; and r = 0.709, p < 0.01) respectively.
Conclusion: The study highlights the critical role of knowledge, attitudes, social pressure, and perceived behavior in shaping nurses' intentions to prevent IAD. The findings demonstrate that nurses generally have a positive attitude and strong intention to prevent IAD, influenced by their level of education, hospital type, and clinical experience.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.