Farmers' risk attitude, agricultural technology adoption and impacts in Eastern India.

IF 5.4 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Agriculture and Food Security Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1186/s40066-024-00497-x
Vikram Patil, Prakashan Chellattan Veettil
{"title":"Farmers' risk attitude, agricultural technology adoption and impacts in Eastern India.","authors":"Vikram Patil, Prakashan Chellattan Veettil","doi":"10.1186/s40066-024-00497-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Agricultural production is inherently risky, as farmers are exposed to multiple stresses. The adoption of improved agricultural practices could become a key coping strategy to sustain production in such a risky environment. As several technologies are being developed and disseminated along this line, it is important to examine the factors influencing farmers' adoption of these strategies and their impact on productivity. Using survey data of rice growing farmers from eastern states of India, we tested how farmers' risk attitudes influence their decisions to adopt improved agricultural practices and whether the adoption has any influence on rice productivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Risk-seeking farmers are more likely to adopt mechanization, whereas risk-averse farmers are more likely to adopt stress-tolerant rice varieties (STRVs), which represent a low-/no-capital-cost improved technology. Adoption of these improved technologies has resulted in productivity gains. Yet, their overall adoption is (s)low in India and other developing countries, presenting a broader challenge of suboptimal productivity and requiring deeper policy engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adoption of STRVs and mechanization has been found to have positive impact on rice productivity. These two agricultural technologies, as our results reveal, are adopted by two distinct categories of farmers depending on their risk attitude. However, both technologies could play a complementary role increasing and stabilizing rice production of farmers, and that is where scope for policy lies to bridge this gap. Targeted policy measures such as subsidizing the purchase of machineries for establishment of custom hiring centers, implementing effective extension mechanisms, and integrating STRVs in the seed systems to enhance physical and economic access to these technologies, could significantly increase their adoption and consequently improve productivity and income of farmers.</p>","PeriodicalId":55858,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Food Security","volume":"13 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Food Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-024-00497-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Agricultural production is inherently risky, as farmers are exposed to multiple stresses. The adoption of improved agricultural practices could become a key coping strategy to sustain production in such a risky environment. As several technologies are being developed and disseminated along this line, it is important to examine the factors influencing farmers' adoption of these strategies and their impact on productivity. Using survey data of rice growing farmers from eastern states of India, we tested how farmers' risk attitudes influence their decisions to adopt improved agricultural practices and whether the adoption has any influence on rice productivity.

Results: Risk-seeking farmers are more likely to adopt mechanization, whereas risk-averse farmers are more likely to adopt stress-tolerant rice varieties (STRVs), which represent a low-/no-capital-cost improved technology. Adoption of these improved technologies has resulted in productivity gains. Yet, their overall adoption is (s)low in India and other developing countries, presenting a broader challenge of suboptimal productivity and requiring deeper policy engagement.

Conclusions: Adoption of STRVs and mechanization has been found to have positive impact on rice productivity. These two agricultural technologies, as our results reveal, are adopted by two distinct categories of farmers depending on their risk attitude. However, both technologies could play a complementary role increasing and stabilizing rice production of farmers, and that is where scope for policy lies to bridge this gap. Targeted policy measures such as subsidizing the purchase of machineries for establishment of custom hiring centers, implementing effective extension mechanisms, and integrating STRVs in the seed systems to enhance physical and economic access to these technologies, could significantly increase their adoption and consequently improve productivity and income of farmers.

印度东部农民风险态度、农业技术采用及其影响
背景:农业生产具有内在的风险,因为农民面临多重压力。采用改良的农业做法可能成为在这种危险环境中维持生产的关键应对战略。由于沿着这条路线正在开发和传播若干技术,因此必须审查影响农民采用这些战略的因素及其对生产力的影响。利用对印度东部各邦种植水稻农民的调查数据,我们测试了农民的风险态度如何影响他们采用改良农业做法的决定,以及这种做法是否对水稻产量有任何影响。结果:寻求风险的农民更有可能采用机械化,而规避风险的农民更有可能采用抗逆性水稻品种(strv),这是一种低/无资本成本的改良技术。采用这些改进的技术已经带来了生产力的提高。然而,它们在印度和其他发展中国家的总体采用率很低,这带来了生产率不理想的更广泛挑战,需要更深入的政策参与。结论:采用strv和机械化对水稻产量有积极影响。正如我们的研究结果所揭示的那样,这两种农业技术被两类不同的农民所采用,这取决于他们的风险态度。然而,这两种技术可以在增加和稳定农民的水稻产量方面发挥互补作用,这也是政策弥补这一差距的空间所在。有针对性的政策措施,如补贴购买用于建立定制雇用中心的机器,实施有效的推广机制,以及将strv纳入种子系统以增加对这些技术的物质和经济获取,可以显著增加它们的采用,从而提高农民的生产力和收入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture and Food Security
Agriculture and Food Security Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Agriculture & Food Security is a peer-reviewed open access journal that addresses the challenge of global food security. It publishes articles within the field of food security research, with a particular focus on research that may inform more sustainable agriculture and food systems that better address local, regional, national and/or global food and nutritional insecurity. The journal considers cutting-edge contributions across the breadth of relevant academic disciplines, including agricultural, ecological, environmental, nutritional, and socio-economic sciences, public health and policy. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to: -Agricultural and environmental sciences, including genetics and systems ecology- Animal husbandry, fisheries science and plant science- Global change, biodiversity, climatology and abiotic stresses- Food technology and balancing agricultural outputs across food, feed, fibre and fuel- Economics, information sciences and decision theory- Strategies for the implementation of new policies and practices- Public health in relation to the condition of food and nutritional security. The pioneering advances in research reported in Agriculture & Food Security have far reaching implications both for the developing world and for sustainability in the developed world. The published articles are accessible not only to researchers, but are also of special interest to the wider community of farmers, development and public health workers, policy makers and the general public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信