Editor's Choice – Results of SurVeil Versus IN.PACT Admiral Paclitaxel Coated Balloons in Femoropopliteal Arteries: 24 Month Outcomes of the Randomised TRANSCEND Study
Marianne Brodmann , William A. Gray , Peter A. Schneider , Katharina Kurzmann-Guetl , Leyla Schweiger , Thomas Zeller , Marcus Thieme , Sashi Kilaru , William B. Bachinsky , Robert L. Feldman , Andrew Holden , Ramon L. Varcoe , Alexandra J. Lansky , Kenneth Rosenfield , TRANSCEND Study Investigators
{"title":"Editor's Choice – Results of SurVeil Versus IN.PACT Admiral Paclitaxel Coated Balloons in Femoropopliteal Arteries: 24 Month Outcomes of the Randomised TRANSCEND Study","authors":"Marianne Brodmann , William A. Gray , Peter A. Schneider , Katharina Kurzmann-Guetl , Leyla Schweiger , Thomas Zeller , Marcus Thieme , Sashi Kilaru , William B. Bachinsky , Robert L. Feldman , Andrew Holden , Ramon L. Varcoe , Alexandra J. Lansky , Kenneth Rosenfield , TRANSCEND Study Investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.11.351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of the TRANSCEND study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the next generation SurVeil PCB with the IN.PACT Admiral PCB in patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease. SurVeil is a lower dose PCB (2.0 μg/mm<sup>2</sup> <em>vs.</em> 3.5 μg/mm<sup>2</sup> for IN.PACT Admiral) with a uniform microcrystalline coating intending to enhance durability and maximise drug delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>TRANSCEND is a prospective, single blind, randomised controlled, multicentre, non-inferiority clinical study. Patients with femoropopliteal artery disease in Rutherford stages 2 – 4 were randomised 1:1 to the SurVeil or the IN.PACT Admiral PCB. A sample size of 446 patients was calculated to prove non-inferiority of the SurVeil compared with the IN.PACT Admiral PCB for primary safety and efficacy endpoints at twelve months. Primary safety was defined as a composite of freedom from device and procedure related death through 30 days, and freedom from major target limb amputation and clinically driven (CD) target vessel revascularisation at twelve months. Primary efficacy was defined as primary patency at twelve months as a composite of freedom from binary re-stenosis and freedom from CD target lesion revascularisation. Secondary outcomes were reported up to twenty four months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 446 subjects were randomised, 222 to the SurVeil and 224 to the IN.PACT Admiral PCB. Primary safety was 91.8% for the SurVeil <em>vs.</em> 89.8% for the IN.PACT Admiral PCB (<em>p</em><sub>non-inferiority</sub> < .001), and primary efficacy was 82.2% <em>vs.</em> 85.9% (<em>p</em><sub>non-inferiority</sub> = .003). Primary patency through twenty four months was 65.4% with the SurVeil and 66.9% with the IN.PACT Admiral PCB (<em>p</em><sub>non-inferiority</sub> = .005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The next generation low dose SurVeil PCB demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy up to twenty four months and was non-inferior to the IN.PACT Admiral PCB. (ClinicalTrials registration ID: NCT03241459).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":"69 3","pages":"Pages 452-462"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107858842401308X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The aim of the TRANSCEND study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the next generation SurVeil PCB with the IN.PACT Admiral PCB in patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease. SurVeil is a lower dose PCB (2.0 μg/mm2vs. 3.5 μg/mm2 for IN.PACT Admiral) with a uniform microcrystalline coating intending to enhance durability and maximise drug delivery.
Methods
TRANSCEND is a prospective, single blind, randomised controlled, multicentre, non-inferiority clinical study. Patients with femoropopliteal artery disease in Rutherford stages 2 – 4 were randomised 1:1 to the SurVeil or the IN.PACT Admiral PCB. A sample size of 446 patients was calculated to prove non-inferiority of the SurVeil compared with the IN.PACT Admiral PCB for primary safety and efficacy endpoints at twelve months. Primary safety was defined as a composite of freedom from device and procedure related death through 30 days, and freedom from major target limb amputation and clinically driven (CD) target vessel revascularisation at twelve months. Primary efficacy was defined as primary patency at twelve months as a composite of freedom from binary re-stenosis and freedom from CD target lesion revascularisation. Secondary outcomes were reported up to twenty four months.
Results
A total of 446 subjects were randomised, 222 to the SurVeil and 224 to the IN.PACT Admiral PCB. Primary safety was 91.8% for the SurVeil vs. 89.8% for the IN.PACT Admiral PCB (pnon-inferiority < .001), and primary efficacy was 82.2% vs. 85.9% (pnon-inferiority = .003). Primary patency through twenty four months was 65.4% with the SurVeil and 66.9% with the IN.PACT Admiral PCB (pnon-inferiority = .005).
Conclusion
The next generation low dose SurVeil PCB demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy up to twenty four months and was non-inferior to the IN.PACT Admiral PCB. (ClinicalTrials registration ID: NCT03241459).
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles.
Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.