Sex Differences in Antidepressant Acceptability According to Filled Prescription Sequences in a Nationwide Cohort Study.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Charles Ouazana Vedrines, Nicolas Hoertel, Thomas Lesuffleur, Pierre Denis, Mark Olfson, Carlos Blanco, Frédéric Limosin, Antoine Rachas, Philippe Tuppin, Cédric Lemogne
{"title":"Sex Differences in Antidepressant Acceptability According to Filled Prescription Sequences in a Nationwide Cohort Study.","authors":"Charles Ouazana Vedrines, Nicolas Hoertel, Thomas Lesuffleur, Pierre Denis, Mark Olfson, Carlos Blanco, Frédéric Limosin, Antoine Rachas, Philippe Tuppin, Cédric Lemogne","doi":"10.4088/JCP.23m15128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders is higher in women than in men. In contrast, there is still no clear consensus on the existence of sex-related differences in the effectiveness of antidepressant treatments for these disorders. This real-world study used filled prescription sequences to compare antidepressant medications between women and men at a medication level according to their acceptability (ie, combination of efficacy and tolerability).</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> In a nationwide cohort from the French national health data system (Système National des Données de Santé [SNDS]), 1.2 million people were identified as new antidepressant users for any condition in 2011. The outcome was clinical acceptability as measured by the continuation/change ratio over the 6- month period following the introduction of the first-line treatment. Continuation was defined as at least 2 refills of the same treatment. Change was defined as at least one filled prescription of another antidepressant, an antipsychotic medication, or a mood stabilizer. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were computed through multivariable binary logistic regressions.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Overall, after the first prescription of an antidepressant, the continuation/ change ratio was slightly higher for women than men (aOR [95% CI], 1.06 [1.05-1.08]), with escitalopram ranking first in both. Sex-by-medication interactions were significant for paroxetine (0.91 [0.88-0.95]) and fluoxetine (1.19 [1.12-1.26]) only. Specifically, fluoxetine was significantly more acceptable in female than in male participants (0.73 [0.70-0.75] vs 0.63 [0.60-0.67]), whereas paroxetine was more acceptable in male than in female participants (0.75 [0.72-0.78] vs 0.68 [0.66-0.70]).</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> These real-world data may help practitioners and policymakers prioritize choice of antidepressant medications in women and men.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"85 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.23m15128","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders is higher in women than in men. In contrast, there is still no clear consensus on the existence of sex-related differences in the effectiveness of antidepressant treatments for these disorders. This real-world study used filled prescription sequences to compare antidepressant medications between women and men at a medication level according to their acceptability (ie, combination of efficacy and tolerability).

Methods: In a nationwide cohort from the French national health data system (Système National des Données de Santé [SNDS]), 1.2 million people were identified as new antidepressant users for any condition in 2011. The outcome was clinical acceptability as measured by the continuation/change ratio over the 6- month period following the introduction of the first-line treatment. Continuation was defined as at least 2 refills of the same treatment. Change was defined as at least one filled prescription of another antidepressant, an antipsychotic medication, or a mood stabilizer. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were computed through multivariable binary logistic regressions.

Results: Overall, after the first prescription of an antidepressant, the continuation/ change ratio was slightly higher for women than men (aOR [95% CI], 1.06 [1.05-1.08]), with escitalopram ranking first in both. Sex-by-medication interactions were significant for paroxetine (0.91 [0.88-0.95]) and fluoxetine (1.19 [1.12-1.26]) only. Specifically, fluoxetine was significantly more acceptable in female than in male participants (0.73 [0.70-0.75] vs 0.63 [0.60-0.67]), whereas paroxetine was more acceptable in male than in female participants (0.75 [0.72-0.78] vs 0.68 [0.66-0.70]).

Conclusion: These real-world data may help practitioners and policymakers prioritize choice of antidepressant medications in women and men.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信